Thanks for posting this, friend. My post was an attempt to explain something and be helpful without having to do a lot of back research. The caveats I offer were because beyond the basics I haven't looked recently into the Q clock phenomenon. I am open to fraternal correction. I posted in passing so the disdain may have come off as heavy handed.

I couldn't remember how the Q clock started so thanks for reminding me.

The only disdain I have for the Q clock theory and Q research decodes is when people stretch meaning too far to find a connection or do weird numerology (like serialbrain2 did - I think that was the name).

So for future proves past and for legitimizing Q I think the Q clock is great. For datefagging or for trying to predict the future I think the Q clock now isn't as relevant outside of that initial establishment of "Can we trust Q? -> Holy Moly Q is legit". It is tool with uses but for some of us who were watching early on (I was within that first month or so) it helps us have few doubts about original Q. Current Q (June posts around Roe vs Wade) needs to be established again using Q deltas with Trump messages.

Since the game is information/disinformation and moves/countermoves I have my skepticism on the Q team using a model like the Q clock as a rigid and easily predictable tool. Sometimes it works when posts are for the anons or for stirring up deep state but other times posts are not for us and may never be explained.

So I do believe in the Q clock model but personally with the amount of years gone by I don't need it to legitimize Q. Newer anons might.

Now we are in a different phase. Since there aren't recent Q drops and a lot of unfulfilled Q posts (that lead to us datefagging on) as I think about it, based on what you wrote, I can see a good use for the model in proper datefagging (Hey, guys this future date is possible and interesting versus the it is this day guaranteed form of datefagging). Proper datefagging or deltas can be helpful for newer anons or for those who do deep digging.

As for me things are so real in the news and in geopolitics that we see happenings all the time. Maybe the best thing Q did for me is help me see beyond the lens of the media propaganda. Not that we don't need new Q posts now (I would love to feel the experience and hype of a fresh Q post again) but we are awake and trained by Q. We see the patterns and through the lies. Just as we feel and see happenings escalating so too does the deep state feel the heat. I don't know when things will happen but damn isn't it satisfying watching the deep state fail in their propaganda. Maybe that is where I am getting my new Q post dopamine hits from now.

Thanks for posting this, friend. My post was an attempt to explain something and be helpful without having to do a lot of back research. The caveats I offer were because beyond the basics I haven't looked recently into the Q clock phenomenon. I am open to fraternal correction. I posted in passing so the disdain may have come off as heavy handed.

I couldn't remember how the Q clock started so thanks for reminding me.

The only disdain I have for the Q clock theory and Q research decodes is when people stretch meaning too far to find a connection or do weird numerology (like serialbrain2 did - I think that was the name).

So for future proves past and for legitimizing Q I think the Q clock is great. For datefagging or for trying to predict the future I think the Q clock now isn't as relevant outside of that initial establishment of "Can we trust Q? -> Holy Moly Q is legit". It is tool with uses but for some of us who were watching early on (I was within that first month or so) it helps us have few doubts about original Q. Current Q (June posts around Roe vs Wade) needs to be established again using Q deltas with Trump messages.

Since the game is information/disinformation and moves/countermoves I have my skepticism on the Q team using a model like the Q clock as a rigid and easily predictable tool. Sometimes it works when posts are for the anons or for stirring up deep state but other times posts are not for us and may never be explained.

So I do believe in the Q clock model but personally with the amount of years gone by I don't need it to legitimize Q. Newer anons might.

Now we are in a different phase. Since there aren't recent Q drops and a lot of unfulfilled Q posts (that lead to us datefagging on) as I think about it, based on what you wrote, I can see a good use for the model in proper datefagging (Hey, guys this future date is possible and interesting versus the it is this day guaranteed form of datefagging). Proper datefagging or deltas can be helpful for newer anons or for those who do deep digging.

As for me things are so real in the news and in geopolitics that we see happenings all the time. Maybe the best thing Q did for me is help me see beyond the lens of the media propaganda. Not that we don't need new Q posts now (I would love to feel the experience and hype of a fresh Q post again) but we are awake and trained by Q. We see the patterns and through the lies. Just as we feel and see happenings escalating so too does the deep state feel the heat. I don't know when things will happen but damn isn't it satisfying watching the deep state fail in their propaganda. Maybe that is were I am getting my new Q post dopamine hits from now.