Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I hear you. I had all the same questions - what about this and what about that. All good questions.

First, none of those so called viruses have EVER been isolated and purified. What they claim is isolation is bogus fraud. What we have come to understand about viruses in reality exists, for the most part, as some conceptual entity in silico - in a computer program. Every test ever performed that has taken a so called purified virus and tried to cause the disease state that the virus was supposed to have initiated, has failed to cause the disease. The data just is not there even though they claim that it is. In college I ran afoul of my professors for challenging the data and wanting to know where it was - because I could not find it. This is the basis for creating vaxxines?

I rejected vaxxines years ago when I got a good look at how the damn things were made. That was after I was made sick by influenza vaxxines. Why did they have to go through the process they did to grow a so called virus? The genetic contamination from human to animals is crazy. Plus there is the fact that they contain heavy metals and other contaminants - such as MSG, PEG, and glyphosate.

We have also been hijacked by public health researchers that look at data from public health studies that are based upon highly flawed models and study design. That data is then shown to all of us health care professionals, and the public, and is supposed to demonstrate how effective the vaxxine programs have been in eliminating infectious viral disease. Garbage in, and garbage out. I worked in research and know how to read damn stats. When you drill down on what they provide as proof, it is just the tip of a very big manipulated fraud perpetrated by Big Pharm and Rockefeller medicine. Remember, Goebbels said, tell a lie often enough, and long enough, and people will eventually believe it. When I called BS on their "expert" data, I was marginalized and keep at arm's length by the majority of my colleagues.

Many of the so called pandemics and modern emerging infectious disease can be linked to poor sanitation, weakened immune systems, toxins like pesticides, bacterial infection, and vaxxines. Many of our modern diseases, especially chronic disease, did not exist prior to the 20th century. I refuse to believe that some hidden virus is suddenly released upon the world because someone decided to disturb some vegetation in Africa. The influenza pandemic in 1918 was from an experimental vaxxine developed by the same department of defense demons poisoning us and our troops today. Polio was because of pesticides and the vaxxines. When you start to see what is deliberate deception in order to create a particular paradigm, you have to ask yourself why. What are they not telling us? If the science is solid, then why the deception? That is when you go down the rabbit hole. Look into the whole story of HIV. It was all fraud. The so called pictures, also fraud. They cannot prove those are viruses. Vesicles released from cellular detoxification look the same. They just claim those detoxification products from poisoned cells, that they created, are viruses. That is not science. All of Luc Montagnier's studies have never been reproduced. For this he won a Nobel Prize? Then Robert Gallo claims this image in the picture is the virus responsible for AIDS. There are no studies to prove this. It has all been a lie.

To the question of what appears to be transmission of infection. We are also getting some more research, although in dribbles, on the ability of a person's body to resonate with others. This question was being looked at early in the twentieth century, but Rockefeller medicine buried it - like they did so many other studies that were trying to do real science. The research only goes where the money says it goes. The idea makes sense as we are electrical beings that resonate with our surroundings. When a person is emotionally connected to, and in close contact with someone that is not well, there can be a change in a person's own resonance - meaning, that a person's symptoms are felt by another. Think about it - have we ever been able to explain empathy pain or symptoms. Why is it that young women in close contact somehow seem to sync their menses? What causes sympathy pregnancy in men? My uncle had sympathetic labor pain so bad he had to be hospitalized with my aunt. After she delivered, he was fine. There is just so much we do not know, and have not been allowed to explore. Science is never settled. That is mistake number one. When you understand the actual science behind all this, that can be verified by actual lab results, the way it was supposed to work, none of what we have been taught seems to be correct.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I hear you. I had all the same questions - what about this and what about that. All good questions.

First, none of those so called viruses have EVER been isolated and purified. What they claim is isolation is bogus fraud. What we have come to understand about viruses in reality exists, for the most part, as some conceptual entity in silico - in a computer program. Every test ever performed that has taken a so called purified virus and tried to cause the disease state that the virus was supposed to have initiated, has failed to cause the disease. The data just is not there even though they claim that it is. In college I ran afoul of my professors for challenging the data and wanting to know where it was - because I could not find it. This is the basis for creating vaxxines?

I rejected vaxxines years ago when I got a good look at how the damn things were made. That was after I was made sick by influenza vaxxines. Why did they have to go through the process they did to grow a so called virus? The genetic contamination from human to animals is crazy. Plus there is the fact that they contain heavy metals and other contaminants - such as MSG, PEG, and glyphosate.

We have also been hijacked by public health researchers that look at data from public health studies that are based upon highly flawed models and study design. That data is then shown to all of us health care professionals, and the public, and is supposed to demonstrate how effective the vaxxine programs have been in eliminating infectious viral disease. Garbage in, and garbage out. I worked in research and know how to read damn stats. When you drill down on what they provide as proof, it is just the tip of a very big manipulated fraud perpetrated by Big Pharm and Rockefeller medicine. Remember, Goebbels said, tell a lie often enough, and long enough, and people will eventually believe it. When I called BS on their "expert" data, I was marginalized and keep at arm's length by the majority of my colleagues.

Many of the so called pandemics and modern emerging infectious disease can be linked to poor sanitation, weakened immune systems, toxins like pesticides, bacterial infection, and vaxxines. Many of our modern diseases, especially chronic disease, did not exist prior to the 20th century. I refuse to believe that some hidden virus is suddenly released upon the world because someone decided to disturb some vegetation in Africa. The influenza pandemic in 1918 was from an experimental vaxxine developed by the same department of defense demons poisoning us and our troops today. Polio was because of pesticides and the vaxxines. When you start to see what is deliberate deception in order to create a particular paradigm, you have to ask yourself why. What are they not telling us? If the science is solid, then why the deception? That is when you go down the rabbit hole. Look into the whole story of HIV. It was all fraud. The so called pictures, also fraud. They cannot prove those are viruses. Vesicles released from cellular detoxification look the same. They just claim those detoxification products from poisoned cells, that they created, are viruses. That is not science. All of Luc Montagnier's studies have never been reproduced. For this he won a Nobel Prize? Then Robert Gallo claims this image in the picture is the virus responsible for AIDS. There is no studies to prove this. It has all been a lie.

To the question of what appears to be transmission of infection. We are also getting some more research, although in dribbles, on the ability of a person's body to resonate with others. This question was being looked at early in the twentieth century, but Rockefeller medicine buried it - like they did so many other studies that were trying to do real science. The research only goes where the money says it goes. The idea makes sense as we are electrical beings that resonate with our surroundings. When a person is emotionally connected to, and in close contact with someone that is not well, there can be a change in a person's own resonance - meaning, that a person's symptoms are felt by another. Think about it - have we ever been able to explain empathy pain or symptoms. Why is it that young women in close contact somehow seem to sync their menses? What causes sympathy pregnancy in men? My uncle had sympathetic labor pain so bad he had to be hospitalized with my aunt. After she delivered, he was fine. There is just so much we do not know, and have not been allowed to explore. Science is never settled. That is mistake number one. When you understand the actual science behind all this, that can be verified by actual lab results, the way it was supposed to work, none of what we have been taught seems to be correct.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I hear you. I had all the same questions - what about this and what about that. All good questions.

First, none of those so called viruses have EVER been isolated and purified. What they claim is isolation is bogus fraud. What we have come to understand about viruses in reality exists, for the most part, as some conceptual entity in silico - in a computer program. Every test ever performed that has taken a so called purified virus and tried to cause the disease state that the virus was supposed to have initiated, has failed to cause the disease. The data just is not there even though they claim that it is. In college I ran afoul of my professors for challenging the data and wanting to know where it was - because I could not find it. This is the basis for creating vaxxines?

I rejected vaxxines years ago when I got a good look at how the damn things were made. That was after I was made sick by influenza vaxxines. Why did they have to go through the process they did to grow a so called virus? The genetic contamination from human to animals is crazy. Plus there is the fact that they contain heavy metals and other contaminants - such as MSG, PEG, and glyphosate.

We have also been hijacked by public health researchers that look at data from public health studies that are based upon highly flawed models and study design. That data is then shown to all of us health care professionals, and the public, and is supposed to demonstrate how effective the vaxxine programs have been in eliminating infectious viral disease. Garbage in, and garbage out. I worked in research and know how to read damn stats. When you drill down on what they provide as proof, it is just the tip of a very big manipulated fraud perpetrated by Big Pharm and Rockefeller medicine. Remember, Goebbels said, tell a lie often enough, and long enough, and people will eventually believe it. When I called BS on their "expert" data, I was marginalized and keep at arm's length by the majority of my colleagues.

Many of the so called pandemics and modern emerging infectious disease can be linked to poor sanitation, weakened immune systems, toxins like pesticides, bacterial infection, and vaxxines. Many of our modern diseases, especially chronic disease, did not exist prior to the 20th century. I refuse to believe that some hidden virus is suddenly released upon the world because someone decided to disturb some vegetation in Africa. The influenza pandemic in 1918 was from an experimental vaxxine developed by the same department of defense demons poisoning us and our troops today. Polio was because of pesticides and the vaxxines. When you start to see what is deliberate deception in order to create a particular paradigm, you have to ask yourself why. What are they not telling us? If the science is solid, then why the deception? That is when you go down the rabbit hole. Look into the whole story of HIV. It was all fraud. The so called pictures, also fraud. They cannot prove those are viruses. Vesicles released from cellular detoxification look the same. They just claim those detoxification products from poisoned cells, that they created, are viruses. That is not science. All of Luc Montagnier's studies have never been reproduced. For this he won a Nobel Prize?

To the question of what appears to be transmission of infection. We are also getting some more research, although in dribbles, on the ability of a person's body to resonate with others. This question was being looked at early in the twentieth century, but Rockefeller medicine buried it - like they did so many other studies that were trying to do real science. The research only goes where the money says it goes. The idea makes sense as we are electrical beings that resonate with our surroundings. When a person is emotionally connected to, and in close contact with someone that is not well, there can be a change in a person's own resonance - meaning, that a person's symptoms are felt by another. Think about it - have we ever been able to explain empathy pain or symptoms. Why is it that young women in close contact somehow seem to sync their menses? What causes sympathy pregnancy in men? My uncle had sympathetic labor pain so bad he had to be hospitalized with my aunt. After she delivered, he was fine. There is just so much we do not know, and have not been allowed to explore. Science is never settled. That is mistake number one. When you understand the actual science behind all this, that can be verified by actual lab results, the way it was supposed to work, none of what we have been taught seems to be correct.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I hear you. I had all the same questions - what about this and what about that. All good questions.

First, none of those so called viruses have EVER been isolated and purified. What they claim is isolation is bogus fraud. What we have come to understand about viruses in reality exists, for the most part, as some conceptual entity in silico - in a computer program. Every test ever performed that has taken a so called purified virus and tried to cause the disease state that the virus was supposed to have initiated, has failed to cause the disease. The data just is not there even though they claim that it is. In college I ran afoul of my professors for challenging the data and wanting to know where it was - because I could not find it. This is the basis for creating vaxxines?

I rejected vaxxines years ago when I got a good look at how the damn things were made. That was after I was made sick by influenza vaxxines. Why did they have to go through the process they did to grow a so called virus? The genetic contamination from human to animals is crazy. Plus there is the fact that they contain heavy metals and other contaminants - such as MSG, PEG, and glyphosate.

We have also been hijacked by public health researchers that look at data from public health studies that are based upon highly flawed models and study design. That data is then shown to all of us health care professionals, and the public, and is supposed to demonstrate how effective the vaxxine programs have been in eliminating infectious viral disease. Garbage in, and garbage out. I worked in research and know how to read damn stats. When you drill down on what they provide as proof, it is just the tip of a very big manipulated fraud perpetrated by Big Pharm and Rockefeller medicine. Remember, Goebbels said, tell a lie often enough, and long enough, and people will eventually believe it. When I called BS on their "expert" data, I was marginalized and keep at arm's length by the majority of my colleagues.

Many of the so called pandemics and modern emerging infectious disease can be linked to poor sanitation, weakened immune systems, toxins like pesticides, bacterial infection, and vaxxines. Many of our modern diseases, especially chronic disease, did not exist prior to the 20th century. I refuse to believe that some hidden virus is suddenly released upon the world because someone decided to disturb some vegetation in Africa. The influenza pandemic in 1918 was from an experimental vaxxine developed by the same department of defense demons poisoning us and our troops today. Polio was because of pesticides and the vaxxines. When you start to see what is deliberate deception in order to create a particular paradigm, you have to ask yourself why. What are they not telling us? If the science is solid, then why the deception? That is when you go down the rabbit hole. Look into the whole story of HIV. It was all fraud. The so called pictures, also fraud. They cannot prove those are viruses. Vesicles released from cellular detoxification look the same. They just claim those detoxification products from poisoned cells, that they created, are viruses. That is not science.

To the question of what appears to be transmission of infection. We are also getting some more research, although in dribbles, on the ability of a person's body to resonate with others. This question was being looked at early in the twentieth century, but Rockefeller medicine buried it - like they did so many other studies that were trying to do real science. The research only goes where the money says it goes. The idea makes sense as we are electrical beings that resonate with our surroundings. When a person is emotionally connected to, and in close contact with someone that is not well, there can be a change in a person's own resonance - meaning, that a person's symptoms are felt by another. Think about it - have we ever been able to explain empathy pain or symptoms. Why is it that young women in close contact somehow seem to sync their menses? What causes sympathy pregnancy in men? My uncle had sympathetic labor pain so bad he had to be hospitalized with my aunt. After she delivered, he was fine. There is just so much we do not know, and have not been allowed to explore. Science is never settled. That is mistake number one. When you understand the actual science behind all this, that can be verified by actual lab results, the way it was supposed to work, none of what we have been taught seems to be correct.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I hear you. I had all the same questions - what about this and what about that. All good questions.

First, none of those so called viruses have EVER been isolated and purified. What they claim is isolation is bogus fraud. What we have come to understand about viruses in reality exists, for the most part, as some conceptual entity in silico - in a computer program. Every test ever performed that has taken a so called purified virus and tried to cause the disease state that the virus was supposed to have initiated, has failed to cause the disease. The data just is not there even though they claim that it is. In college I ran afoul of my professors for challenging the data and wanting to know where it was - because I could not find it. This is the basis for creating vaxxines?

I rejected vaxxines years ago when I got a good look at how the damn things were made. That was after I was made sick by influenza vaxxines. Why did they have to go through the process they did to grow a so called virus? The genetic contamination from human to animals is crazy. Plus there is the fact that they contain heavy metals and other contaminants - such as MSG, PEG, and glyphosate.

We have also been hijacked by public health researchers that look at data from public health studies that are based upon highly flawed models and study design. That data is then shown to all of us health care professionals, and the public, and is supposed to demonstrate how effective the vaxxine programs have been in eliminating infectious viral disease. Garbage in, and garbage out. I worked in research and know how to read damn stats. When you drill down on what they provide as proof, it is just the tip of a very big manipulated fraud perpetrated by Big Pharm and Rockefeller medicine. Remember, Goebbels said, tell a lie often enough, and long enough, and people will eventually believe it. When I called BS on their "expert" data, I was marginalized and keep at arm's length by the majority of my colleagues.

Many of the so called pandemics and modern emerging infectious disease can be linked to poor sanitation, weakened immune systems, toxins like pesticides, bacterial infection, and vaxxines. Many of our modern diseases, especially chronic disease, did not exist prior to the 20th century. I refuse to believe that some hidden virus is suddenly released upon the world because someone decided to disturb some vegetation in Africa. The influenza pandemic in 1918 was from an experimental vaxxine developed by the same department of defense demons poisoning us and our troops today. Polio was because of pesticides and the vaxxines. When you start to see what is deliberate deception in order to create a particular paradigm, you have to ask yourself why. What are they not telling us? If the science is solid, then why the deception? That is when you go down the rabbit hole. Look into the whole story of HIV. It was all fraud. The so called pictures, also fraud. They cannot prove those are viruses. Vesicles releases from cellular detoxification look the same. They just claim those detoxification products from poisoned cells, that they created, are viruses. That is not science.

To the question of what appears to be transmission of infection. We are also getting some more research, although in dribbles, on the ability of a person's body to resonate with others. This question was being looked at early in the twentieth century, but Rockefeller medicine buried it - like they did so many other studies that were trying to do real science. The research only goes where the money says it goes. The idea makes sense as we are electrical beings that resonate with our surroundings. When a person is emotionally connected to, and in close contact with someone that is not well, there can be a change in a person's own resonance - meaning, that a person's symptoms are felt by another. Think about it - have we ever been able to explain empathy pain or symptoms. Why is it that young women in close contact somehow seem to sync their menses? What causes sympathy pregnancy in men? My uncle had sympathetic labor pain so bad he had to be hospitalized with my aunt. After she delivered, he was fine. There is just so much we do not know, and have not been allowed to explore. Science is never settled. That is mistake number one. When you understand the actual science behind all this, that can be verified by actual lab results, the way it was supposed to work, none of what we have been taught seems to be correct.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I hear you. I had all the same questions - what about this and what about that. All good questions.

First, none of those so called viruses have EVER been isolated and purified. What they claim is isolation is bogus fraud. What we have come to understand about viruses in reality exists, for the most part, as some conceptual entity in silico - in a computer program. Every test ever performed that has taken a so called purified virus and tried to cause the disease state that the virus was supposed to have initiated, has failed to cause the disease. The data just is not there even though they claim that it is. In college I ran afoul of my professors for challenging the data and wanting to know where it was - because I could not find it. This is the basis for creating vaxxines?

I rejected vaxxines years ago when I got a good look at how the damn things were made. That was after I was made sick by influenza vaxxines. Why did they have to go through the process they did to grow a so called virus? The genetic contamination from human to animals is crazy. Plus there is the fact that they contain heavy metals and other contaminants - such as MSG, PEG, and glyphosate.

We have also been hijacked by public health researchers that look at data from public health studies that are based upon highly flawed models and study design. That data is then shown to all of us health care professionals, and the public, and is supposed to demonstrate how effective the vaxxine programs have been in eliminating infectious viral disease. Garbage in, and garbage out. I worked in research and know how to read damn stats. When you drill down on what they provide as proof, it is just the tip of a very big manipulated fraud perpetrated by Big Pharm and Rockefeller medicine. Remember, Goebbels said, tell a lie often enough, and long enough, and people will eventually believe it. When I called BS on their "expert" data, I was marginalized and keep at arm's length by the majority of my colleagues.

Many of the so called pandemics and modern emerging infectious disease can be linked to poor sanitation, weakened immune systems, toxins like pesticides, bacterial infection, and vaxxines. Many of our modern diseases, especially chronic disease, did not exist prior to the 20th century. I refuse to believe that some hidden virus is suddenly released upon the world because someone decided to disturb some vegetation in Africa. The influenza pandemic in 1918 was from an experimental vaxxine developed by the same department of defense demons poisoning us and our troops today. Polio was because of pesticides and the vaxxines. When you start to see what is deliberate deception in order to create a particular paradigm, you have to ask yourself why. What are they not telling us? If the science is solid, then why the deception? That is when you go down the rabbit hole. Look into the whole story of HIV. It was all fraud.

To the question of what appears to be transmission of infection. We are also getting some more research, although in dribbles, on the ability of a person's body to resonate with others. This question was being looked at early in the twentieth century, but Rockefeller medicine buried it - like they did so many other studies that were trying to do real science. The research only goes where the money says it goes. The idea makes sense as we are electrical beings that resonate with our surroundings. When a person is emotionally connected to, and in close contact with someone that is not well, there can be a change in a person's own resonance - meaning, that a person's symptoms are felt by another. Think about it - have we ever been able to explain empathy pain or symptoms. Why is it that young women in close contact somehow seem to sync their menses? What causes sympathy pregnancy in men? My uncle had sympathetic labor pain so bad he had to be hospitalized with my aunt. After she delivered, he was fine. There is just so much we do not know, and have not been allowed to explore. Science is never settled. That is mistake number one. When you understand the actual science behind all this, that can be verified by actual lab results, the way it was supposed to work, none of what we have been taught seems to be correct.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I hear you. I had all the same questions - what about this and what about that. All good questions.

First, none of those so called viruses have EVER been isolated and purified. What they claim is isolation is bogus fraud. What we have come to understand about viruses in reality exists, for the most part, as some conceptual entity in silico - in a computer program. Every test ever performed that has taken a so called purified virus and tried to cause the disease state that the virus was supposed to have initiated, has failed to cause the disease. The data just is not there even though they claim that it is. In college I ran afoul of my professors for challenging the data and wanting to know where it was - because I could not find it. This is the basis for creating vaxxines?

I rejected vaxxines years ago when I got a good look at how the damn things were made. That was after I was made sick by influenza vaxxines. Why did they have to go through the process they did to grow a so called virus? The genetic contamination from human to animals is crazy. Plus there is the fact that they contain heavy metals and other contaminants - such as MSG, PEG, and glyphosate.

We have also been hijacked by public health researchers that look at data from public health studies that are based upon highly flawed models and study design. That data is then shown to all of us health care professionals, and the public, and is supposed to demonstrate how effective the vaxxine programs have been in eliminating infectious viral disease. Garbage in, and garbage out. I worked in research and know how to read damn stats. When you drill down on what they provide as proof, it is just the tip of a very big manipulated fraud perpetrated by Big Pharm and Rockefeller medicine. Remember, Goebbels said, tell a lie often enough, and long enough, and people will eventually believe it. When I called BS on their "expert" data, I was marginalized and keep at arm's length by the majority of my colleagues.

Many of the so called pandemics and modern emerging infectious disease can be linked to poor sanitation, weakened immune systems, toxins like pesticides, bacterial infection, and vaxxines. Many of our modern diseases, especially chronic disease, did not exist prior to the 20th century. I refuse to believe that some hidden virus is suddenly released upon the world because someone decided to disturb some vegetation in Africa. The influenza pandemic in 1918 was from an experimental vaxxine developed by the same department of defense demons poisoning us and our troops today. Polio was because of pesticides and the vaxxines. When you start to see what is deliberate deception in order to create a particular paradigm, you have to ask yourself why. What are they not telling us? If the science is solid, then why the deception? That is when you go down the rabbit hole. Look into the whole story of HIV. It was all fraud.

To the question of what appears to be transmission of infection. We are also getting some more research, although in dribbles, on the ability of a person's body to resonate with others. This question was being looked at early in the twentieth century, but Rockefeller medicine buried it - like they did so many other studies that were trying to do real science. The research only goes where the money says it goes. The idea makes sense as we are electrical beings that resonate with our surroundings. When a person is emotionally connected to, and in close contact with someone that is not well, there can be a change in a person's own resonance - meaning, that a person's symptoms are felt by another. Think about it - have we ever been able to explain empathy pain or symptoms. What causes sympathy pregnancy in men? My uncle had sympathetic labor pain so bad he had to be hospitalized with my aunt. After she delivered, he was fine. There is just so much we do not know, and have not been allowed to explore. Science is never settled. That is mistake number one. When you understand the actual science behind all this, that can be verified by actual lab results, the way it was supposed to work, none of what we have been taught seems to be correct.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I hear you. I had all the same questions - what about this and what about that. All good questions.

First, none of those so called viruses have EVER been isolated and purified. What they claim is isolation is bogus fraud. What we have come to understand about viruses in reality exists, for the most part, as some conceptual entity in silico - in a computer program. Every test ever performed that has taken a so called purified virus and tried to cause the disease state that the virus was supposed to have initiated, has failed to cause the disease. The data just is not there even though they claim that it is. In college I ran afoul of my professors for challenging the data and wanting to know where it was - because I could not find it. This is the basis for creating vaxxines?

I rejected vaxxines years ago when I got a good look at how the damn things were made. That was after I was made sick by influenza vaxxines. Why did they have to go through the process they did to grow a so called virus? The genetic contamination from human to animals is crazy. Plus there is the fact that they contain heavy metals and other contaminants - such as MSG, PEG, and glyphosate.

We have also been hijacked by public health researchers that look at data from public health studies that are based upon highly flawed models and study design. That data is then shown to all of us health care professionals, and the public, and is supposed to demonstrate how effective the vaxxine programs have been in eliminating infectious viral disease. Garbage in, and garbage out. I worked in research and know how to read damn stats. When you drill down on what they provide as proof, it is just the tip of a very big manipulated fraud perpetrated by Big Pharm and Rockefeller medicine. Remember, Goebbels said, tell a lie often enough, and long enough, and people will eventually believe it. When I called BS on their "expert" data, I was marginalized and keep at arm's length by the majority of my colleagues.

Many of the so called pandemics and modern emerging infectious disease can be linked to poor sanitation, weakened immune systems, toxins like pesticides, bacterial infection, and vaxxines. Many of our modern diseases, especially chronic disease, did not exist prior to the 20th century. I refuse to believe that some hidden virus is suddenly released upon the world because someone decided to disturb some vegetation in Africa. The influenza pandemic in 1918 was from an experimental vaxxine developed by the same department of defense demons poisoning us and our troops today. When you start to see what is deliberate deception in order to create a particular paradigm, you have to ask yourself why. What are they not telling us? If the science is solid, then why the deception? That is when you go down the rabbit hole. Look into the whole story of HIV. It was all fraud.

To the question of what appears to be transmission of infection. We are also getting some more research, although in dribbles, on the ability of a person's body to resonate with others. This question was being looked at early in the twentieth century, but Rockefeller medicine buried it - like they did so many other studies that were trying to do real science. The research only goes where the money says it goes. The idea makes sense as we are electrical beings that resonate with our surroundings. When a person is emotionally connected to, and in close contact with someone that is not well, there can be a change in a person's own resonance - meaning, that a person's symptoms are felt by another. Think about it - have we ever been able to explain empathy pain or symptoms. What causes sympathy pregnancy in men? My uncle had sympathetic labor pain so bad he had to be hospitalized with my aunt. After she delivered, he was fine. There is just so much we do not know, and have not been allowed to explore. Science is never settled. That is mistake number one. When you understand the actual science behind all this, that can be verified by actual lab results, the way it was supposed to work, none of what we have been taught seems to be correct.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I hear you. I had all the same questions - what about this and what about that. All good questions.

First, none of those so called viruses have EVER been isolated and purified. What they claim is isolation is bogus fraud. What we have come to understand about viruses in reality exists, for the most part, as some conceptual entity in silico - in a computer program. Every test ever performed that has taken a so called purified virus and tried to cause the disease state that the virus was supposed to have initiated, has failed to cause the disease. The data just is not there even though they claim that it is. In college I ran afoul of my professors for challenging the data and wanting to know where it was - because I could not find it. This is the basis for creating vaxxines?

I rejected vaxxines years ago when I got a good look at how the damn things were made. That was after I was made sick by influenza vaxxines. Why did they have to go through the process they did to grow a so called virus? The genetic contamination from human to animals is crazy. Plus there is the fact that they contain heavy metals and other contaminants - such as MSG, PEG, and glyphosate.

We have also been hijacked by public health researchers that look at data from public health studies that are based upon highly flawed models and study design. That data is then shown to all of us health care professionals, and the public, and is supposed to demonstrate how effective the vaxxine programs have been in eliminating infectious viral disease. Garbage in, and garbage out. I worked in research and know how to read damn stats. When you drill down on what they provide as proof, it is just the tip of a very big manipulated fraud perpetrated by Big Pharm and Rockefeller medicine. Remember, Goebbels said, tell a lie often enough, and long enough, and people will eventually believe it. When I called BS on their "expert" data, I was marginalized and keep at arm's length by the majority of my colleagues.

Many of the so called pandemics and modern emerging infectious disease can be linked to poor sanitation, weakened immune systems, toxins like pesticides, bacterial infection, and vaxxines. Many of our modern diseases, especially chronic disease, did not exist prior to the 20th century. I refused to believe that some hidden virus is suddenly release upon the world because someone decided to disturb some vegetation in Africa. The influenza pandemic in 1918 was from an experimental vaxxine developed by the same department of defense demons poisoning us and our troops today. When you start to see what is deliberate deception in order to create a particular paradigm, you have to ask yourself why. What are they not telling us? If the science is solid, then why the deception? That is when you go down the rabbit hole. Look into the whole story of HIV. It was all fraud.

To the question of what appears to be transmission of infection. We are also getting some more research, although in dribbles, on the ability of a person's body to resonate with others. This question was being looked at early in the twentieth century, but Rockefeller medicine buried it - like they did so many other studies that were trying to do real science. The research only goes where the money says it goes. The idea makes sense as we are electrical beings that resonate with our surroundings. When a person is emotionally connected to, and in close contact with someone that is not well, there can be a change in a person's own resonance - meaning, that a person's symptoms are felt by another. Think about it - have we ever been able to explain empathy pain or symptoms. What causes sympathy pregnancy in men? My uncle had sympathetic labor pain so bad he had to be hospitalized with my aunt. After she delivered, he was fine. There is just so much we do not know, and have not been allowed to explore. Science is never settled. That is mistake number one. When you understand the actual science behind all this, that can be verified by actual lab results, the way it was supposed to work, none of what we have been taught seems to be correct.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I hear you. I had all the same questions - what about this and what about that. All good questions.

First, none of those so called viruses have EVER been isolated and purified. What they claim is isolation is bogus fraud. What we have come to understand about viruses in reality exists, for the most part, as some conceptual entity in silico - in a computer program. Every test ever performed that has taken a so called purified virus and tried to cause the disease state that the virus was supposed to have initiated, has failed to cause the disease. The data just is not there even though they claim that it is. In college I ran afoul of my professors for challenging the data and wanting to know where it was - because I could not find it. This is the basis for creating vaxxines?

I rejected vaxxines years ago when I got a good look at how the damn things were made. That was after I was made sick by influenza vaxxines. Why did they have to go through the process they did to grow a so called virus? The genetic contamination from human to animals is crazy. Plus there is the fact that they contain heavy metals and other contaminants - such as MSG, PEG, and glyphosate.

We have also been hijacked by public health researchers that look at data from public health studies that are based upon highly flawed models and study design. That data is then shown to all of us health care professionals, and the public, and is supposed to demonstrate how effective the vaxxine programs have been in eliminating infectious viral disease. Garbage in, and garbage out. I worked in research and know how to read damn stats. When you drill down on what they provide as proof, it is just the tip of a very big manipulated fraud perpetrated by Big Pharm and Rockefeller medicine. Remember, Goebbels said, tell a lie often enough, and long enough, and people will eventually believe it. When I called BS on their "expert" data, I was marginalized and keep at arm's length by the majority of my colleagues.

Many of the so called pandemics and modern emerging infectious disease can be linked to poor sanitation, weakened immune systems, toxins like pesticides, and bacterial infection - and vaxxines. Many of our modern diseases, especially chronic disease, did not exist prior to the 20th century. I refused to believe that some hidden virus is suddenly release upon the world because someone decided to disturb some vegetation in Africa. The influenza pandemic in 1918 was from an experimental vaxxine developed by the same department of defense demons poisoning us and our troops today. When you start to see what is deliberate deception in order to create a particular paradigm, you have to ask yourself why. What are they not telling us? If the science is solid, then why the deception? That is when you go down the rabbit hole. Look into the whole story of HIV. It was all fraud.

To the question of what appears to be transmission of infection. We are also getting some more research, although in dribbles, on the ability of a person's body to resonate with others. This question was being looked at early in the twentieth century, but Rockefeller medicine buried it - like they did so many other studies that were trying to do real science. The research only goes where the money says it goes. The idea makes sense as we are electrical beings that resonate with our surroundings. When a person is emotionally connected to, and in close contact with someone that is not well, there can be a change in a person's own resonance - meaning, that a person's symptoms are felt by another. Think about it - have we ever been able to explain empathy pain or symptoms. What causes sympathy pregnancy in men? My uncle had sympathetic labor pain so bad he had to be hospitalized with my aunt. After she delivered, he was fine. There is just so much we do not know, and have not been allowed to explore. Science is never settled. That is mistake number one. When you understand the actual science behind all this, that can be verified by actual lab results, the way it was supposed to work, none of what we have been taught seems to be correct.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I hear you. I had all the same questions - what about this and what about that. All good questions.

First, none of those so called viruses have EVER been isolated and purified. What they claim is isolation is bogus fraud. What we have come to understand about viruses in reality exists, for the most part, as some conceptual entity in silico - in a computer program. Every test ever performed that has taken a so called purified virus and tried to cause the disease state that the virus was supposed to have initiated, has failed to cause the disease. The data just is not there even though they claim that it is. In college I ran afoul of my professors for challenging the data and wanting to know where it was - because I could not find it. This is the basis for creating vaxxines?

I rejected vaxxines years ago when I got a good look at how the damn things were made. That was after I was made sick by influenza vaxxines. Why did they have to go through the process they did to grow a so called virus? The genetic contamination from human to animals is crazy. Plus there is the fact that they contain heavy metals and other contaminants - such as MSG, PEG, and glyphosate.

We have also been hijacked by public health researchers that look at data from public health studies that are based upon highly flawed models and study design. That data is then shown to all of us health care professionals, and the public, and is supposed to demonstrate how effective the vaxxine programs have been in eliminating infectious viral disease. Garbage in, and garbage out. I worked in research and know how to read damn stats. When you drill down on what they provide as proof, it is just the tip of a very big manipulated fraud perpetrated by Big Pharm and Rockefeller medicine. Remember, Goebbels said, tell a lie often enough, and long enough, and people will eventually believe it. When I called BS on their "expert" data, I was marginalized and keep at arm's length by the majority of my colleagues.

Many of the so called pandemics and modern emerging infectious disease can be linked to poor sanitation, weakened immune systems, toxins like pesticides, and bacterial infection. Many of our modern diseases, especially chronic disease, did not exist prior to the 20th century. I refused to believe that some hidden virus is suddenly release upon the world because someone decided to disturb some vegetation in Africa. The influenza pandemic in 1918 was from an experimental vaxxine developed by the same department of defense demons poisoning us and our troops today. When you start to see what is deliberate deception in order to create a particular paradigm, you have to ask yourself why. What are they not telling us? If the science is solid, then why the deception? That is when you go down the rabbit hole. Look into the whole story of HIV. It was all fraud.

To the question of what appears to be transmission of infection. We are also getting some more research, although in dribbles, on the ability of a person's body to resonate with others. This question was being looked at early in the twentieth century, but Rockefeller medicine buried it - like they did so many other studies that were trying to do real science. The research only goes where the money says it goes. The idea makes sense as we are electrical beings that resonate with our surroundings. When a person is emotionally connected to, and in close contact with someone that is not well, there can be a change in a person's own resonance - meaning, that a person's symptoms are felt by another. Think about it - have we ever been able to explain empathy pain or symptoms. What causes sympathy pregnancy in men? My uncle had sympathetic labor pain so bad he had to be hospitalized with my aunt. After she delivered, he was fine. There is just so much we do not know, and have not been allowed to explore. Science is never settled. That is mistake number one. When you understand the actual science behind all this, that can be verified by actual lab results, the way it was supposed to work, none of what we have been taught seems to be correct.

1 year ago
1 score