I believe the answer to the last question about U.S.A. being within the United States is that the United States is a corporation created when the constitution was ratified, whereas U.S.A. is a corporation created by Congress after the Civil War.

The "D.C. as a corporate overlay" concept is questionable. Looking at the articles of incorporation in 1871 for D.C. (which I can't find atm, but it's in my notes somewhere) you can see that the President of the U.S. is the CEO of that municipal corporation, the senate/congress are the governing body of it, and the federal court system is also the court system which has jurisdiction over D.C. municipal corp affairs. In other words, it is possible that laws passed by them that are perfectly legal in D.C. are illegal in the US proper, and other than in a court of law (which are all fundamentally compromised because our entire current legal system was created by the Rockefellers) there would be no way to tell the difference (I think). However, even if that is true (for which i can't find further evidence other than the initial conflict of interest) that would just be a legal loophole and misses the larger fuckery.

In other words, it's not impossible that there is a corporate overlay, but it's not really important, because the entire system is designed to commit fraud, from top to bottom, and it has been since the beginning, from the Constitution itself. That is why they threw away the first United States corporation, founded by the Articles of Incorporation. It didn't have enough fuckery in it, so they created the second US from the Constitution, that everyone believes is so great.

It's not great, it contains the ultimate fraud.

As for the companies themselves (US Corp Company, CSC, etc.) I don't mean to downplay the significance of these entities. I have no doubt whatsoever they are designed to commit fuckery by the Rockefellers et al. If you read my report on how the corporate world was created it will give you a better sense of what that means.

As of what I have out right now, the report is about 1/3rd done. I hope to have substantially more out soon.

I believe the answer to the last question about U.S.A. being within the United States is that the United States is a corporation created when the constitution was ratified, whereas U.S.A. is a corporation created by Congress after the Civil War.

The "D.C. as a corporate overlay" concept is questionable. Looking at the articles of incorporation in 1871 for D.C. (which I can't find atm, but it's in my notes somewhere) you can see that the President of the U.S. is the CEO of that municipal corporation, the senate/congress are the governing body of it, and the federal court system is also the court system who has jurisdiction over D.C. municipal corp. affairs. In other words, it is possible that laws passed by them that are perfectly legal in D.C. are illegal in the US proper, and other than in a court of law (which are all fundamentally compromised because our entire current legal system was created by the Rockefellers) there would be no way to tell the difference (I think). However, even if that is true (for which i can't find further evidence other than the initial conflict of interest) that would just be a legal loophole and misses the larger fuckery.

In other words, it's not impossible that there is a corporate overlay, but it's not really important, because the entire system is designed to commit fraud, from top to bottom, and it has been since the beginning, from the Constitution itself. That is why they threw away the first United States corporation, founded by the Articles of Incorporation. It didn't have enough fuckery in it, so they created the second US from the Constitution, that everyone believes is so great.

It's not great, it contains the ultimate fraud.

As for the companies themselves (US Corp Company, CSC, etc.) I don't mean to downplay the significance of these entities. I have no doubt whatsoever they are designed to commit fuckery by the Rockefellers et al. If you read my report on how the corporate world was created it will give you a better sense of what that means.

As of what I have out right now, the report is about 1/3rd done. I hope to have substantially more out soon.

I believe the answer to the last question about U.S.A. being within the United States is that the United States is a corporation created when the constitution was ratified, whereas U.S.A. is a corporation created by Congress after the Civil War.

The "D.C. as a corporate overlay" is questionable. Looking at the articles of incorporation in 1871 for D.C. (which I can't find atm, but it's in my notes somewhere) you can see that the President of the U.S. is the CEO of that municipal corporation, the senate/congress are the governing body of it, and the federal court system is also the court system who has jurisdiction over D.C. municipal corp. affairs. In other words, it is possible that laws passed by them that are perfectly legal in D.C. are illegal in the US proper, and other than in a court of law (which are all fundamentally compromised because our entire current legal system was created by the Rockefellers) there would be no way to tell the difference (I think). However, even if that is true (for which i can't find further evidence other than the initial conflict of interest) that would just be a legal loophole and misses the larger fuckery.

In other words, it's not impossible that there is a corporate overlay, but it's not really important, because the entire system is designed to commit fraud, from top to bottom, and it has been since the beginning, from the Constitution itself. That is why they threw away the first United States corporation, founded by the Articles of Incorporation. It didn't have enough fuckery in it, so they created the second US from the Constitution, that everyone believes is so great.

It's not great, it contains the ultimate fraud.

As for the companies themselves (US Corp Company, CSC, etc.) I don't mean to downplay the significance of these entities. I have no doubt whatsoever they are designed to commit fuckery by the Rockefellers et al. If you read my report on how the corporate world was created it will give you a better sense of what that means.

As of what I have out right now, the report is about 1/3rd done. I hope to have substantially more out soon.

I believe the answer to the last question about U.S.A. being within the United States is that the United States is a corporation created when the constitution was ratified, whereas U.S.A. is a corporation created by Congress after the Civil War.

The "D.C. as a corporate overlay" is questionable. Looking at the articles of incorporation in 1871 for D.C. (which I can't find atm, but it's in my notes somewhere) you can see that the President of the U.S. is the CEO of that municipal corporation, the senate/congress are the governing body of it, and the federal court system is also the court system who has jurisdiction over D.C. affairs. In other words, it is possible that laws passed by them that are perfectly legal in D.C. are illegal in the US proper, and other than in a court of law (which are all fundamentally compromised because our entire current legal system was created by the Rockefellers) there would be no way to tell the difference (I think). However, even if that is true (for which i can't find further evidence other than the initial conflict of interest) that would just be a legal loophole and misses the larger fuckery.

In other words, it's not impossible that there is a corporate overlay, but it's not really important, because the entire system is designed to commit fraud, from top to bottom, and it has been since the beginning, from the Constitution itself. That is why they threw away the first United States corporation, founded by the Articles of Incorporation. It didn't have enough fuckery in it, so they created the second US from the Constitution, that everyone believes is so great.

It's not great, it contains the ultimate fraud.

As for the companies themselves (US Corp Company, CSC, etc.) I don't mean to downplay the significance of these entities. I have no doubt whatsoever they are designed to commit fuckery by the Rockefellers et al. If you read my report on how the corporate world was created it will give you a better sense of what that means.

As of what I have out right now, the report is about 1/3rd done. I hope to have substantially more out soon.

I believe the answer to the last question about U.S.A. being within the United States is that the United States is a corporation created when the constitution was ratified, whereas U.S.A. is a corporation created by Congress after the Civil War.

The "D.C. as a corporate overlay" is questionable. Looking at the articles of incorporation in 1871 for D.C. (which I can't find atm, but it's in my notes somewhere) you can see that the President of the U.S. is the CEO of that municipal corporation, and the senate/congress are the governing body of it. In other words, it is possible that laws passed by them that are perfectly legal in D.C. are illegal in the US proper, and other than in a court of law (which are all fundamentally compromised because our entire current legal system was created by the Rockefellers) there would be no way to tell the difference (I think). However, even if that is true (for which i can't find further evidence other than the initial conflict of interest) that would just be a legal loophole and misses the larger fuckery.

In other words, it's not impossible that there is a corporate overlay, but it's not really important, because the entire system is designed to commit fraud, from top to bottom, and it has been since the beginning, from the Constitution itself. That is why they threw away the first United States corporation, founded by the Articles of Incorporation. It didn't have enough fuckery in it, so they created the second US from the Constitution, that everyone believes is so great.

It's not great, it contains the ultimate fraud.

As for the companies themselves (US Corp Company, CSC, etc.) I don't mean to downplay the significance of these entities. I have no doubt whatsoever they are designed to commit fuckery by the Rockefellers et al. If you read my report on how the corporate world was created it will give you a better sense of what that means.

As of what I have out right now, the report is about 1/3rd done. I hope to have substantially more out soon.

I believe the answer to the last question about U.S.A. being within the United States is that the United States is a corporation created when the constitution was ratified, whereas U.S.A. is a corporation created by Congress after the Civil War.

The "D.C. as a corporate overlay" is questionable. Looking at the articles of incorporation in 1871 for D.C. (which I can't find atm, but it's in my notes somewhere) you can see that the President of the U.S. is the CEO of that municipal corporation, and the senate/congress are the governing body of it. In other words, it is possible that laws passed by them that are perfectly legal in D.C. are illegal in the US proper, and other than in a court of law (which are all compromised) there would be no way to tell the difference (I think). However, even if that is true (for which i can't find further evidence other than the initial conflict of interest) that would just be a legal loophole and misses the larger fuckery.

In other words, it's not impossible that there is a corporate overlay, but it's not really important, because the entire system is designed to commit fraud, from top to bottom, and it has been since the beginning, from the Constitution itself. That is why they threw away the first United States corporation, founded by the Articles of Incorporation. It didn't have enough fuckery in it, so they created the second US from the Constitution, that everyone believes is so great.

It's not great, it contains the ultimate fraud.

As for the companies themselves (US Corp Company, CSC, etc.) I don't mean to downplay the significance of these entities. I have no doubt whatsoever they are designed to commit fuckery by the Rockefellers et al. If you read my report on how the corporate world was created it will give you a better sense of what that means.

As of what I have out right now, the report is about 1/3rd done. I hope to have substantially more out soon.