Always open to new information.

If possible, please provide sources (links to documentation, not FBI 302s or newspaper articles) for evidence Montgomery is a fraud and conman.

Original sources and their contexts are important in evaluating allegations of this nature.

In the meantime, seems counterproductive on Lindell's part to file a motion to get the States Secret gag order on Montgomery lifted. That would mean Montgomery would no longer be barred from testifying in court and consequently subject to charges of perjury. Lindell has stated he had the PCAP data evaluated three times over by some of the nation's top cyber security experts. It would seem it would be one thing for Montgomery to con Lindell (who is no cyber expert), but what about all the experts Lindell hired to validate PCAP data. Has Montgomery conned them as well?

Not to mention the exposure to potential charges of perjury as a number of these cyber experts have filed declarations in support of motions and cases in several states (three more scheduled to be filed next week TX, SC, AL and possibly LA) and to which the Montgomery data and testimony could be included as soon as the gag order is lifted.

Seems everybody pushing for transparency and a day in court to prove their case using Montgomery as an expert witness is a fraud and a conman and everybody pushing to keep Montgomery from testifying is not. Quite a conundrum, that.

Dominion and ES&S (plaintiffs) recently argued for a prohibition of any current or former employee being allowed to testify for the defense in their slander case against Mike Lindell and MyPillow (defendants). Seeing a pattern develop in these cases of blocking witnesses from testifying.

Hell... even the President of The United States told us that anyone doubting the integrity of the 2020 election was a threat to national security. Must be true because the President of The United States said it on TV.

Like the Halderman Report detailing all the technical vulnerabilities of electronic voting equipment being held hostage by Judge Totenberg (sealed for over a year) in Georgia at the behest of the DoJ, it seems the Government is trying very hard to keep Montgomery testifying in court for as long as possible.

If Montgomery is a fraud and conman, why would the government care if he perjured himself in open court and proved himself a fraud and conman?

Always open to new information.

If possible, please provide sources (links to documentation, not FBI 302s or newspaper articles) for evidence Montgomery is fraud and conman.

Original sources and their contexts are important in evaluating allegations of this nature.

In the meantime, seems counterproductive on Lindell's part to file a motion to get the States Secret gag order on Montgomery lifted. That would mean Montgomery would no longer be barred from testifying in court and consequently subject to charges of perjury. Lindell has stated he had the PCAP data evaluated three times over by some of the nation's top cyber security experts. It would seem it would be one thing for Montgomery to con Lindell (who is no cyber expert), but what about all the experts Lindell hired to validate PCAP data. Has Montgomery conned them as well?

Not to mention the exposure to potential charges of perjury as a number of these cyber experts have filed declarations in support of motions and cases in several states (three more scheduled to be filed next week TX, SC, AL and possibly LA) and to which the Montgomery data and testimony could be included as soon as the gag order is lifted.

Seems everybody pushing for transparency and a day in court to prove their case using Montgomery as an expert witness is a fraud and a conman and everybody pushing to keep Montgomery from testifying is not. Quite a conundrum, that.

Dominion and ES&S (plaintiffs) recently argued for a prohibition of any current or former employee being allowed to testify for the defense in their slander case against Mike Lindell and MyPillow (defendants). Seeing a pattern develop in these cases of blocking witnesses from testifying.

Hell... even the President of The United States told us that anyone doubting the integrity of the 2020 election was a threat to national security. Must be true because the President of The United States said it on TV.

Like the Halderman Report detailing all the technical vulnerabilities of electronic voting equipment being held hostage by Judge Totenberg (sealed for over a year) in Georgia at the behest of the DoJ, it seems the Government is trying very hard to keep Montgomery testifying in court for as long as possible.

If Montgomery is a fraud and conman, why would the government care if he perjured himself in open court and proved himself a fraud and a conman?

Always open to new information.

If possible, please provide sources (links to documentation, not FBI 302s or newspaper articles) for evidence Montgomery is fraud and conman.

Original sources and their contexts are important in evaluating allegations of this nature.

In the meantime, seems counterproductive on Lindell's part to file a motion to get the States Secret gag order on Montgomery lifted. That would mean Montgomery would no longer be barred from testifying in court and consequently subject to charges of perjury. Lindell has stated he had the PCAP data evaluated three times over by some of the nation's top cyber security experts. It would seem it would be one thing for Montgomery to con Lindell (who is no cyber expert), but what about all the experts Lindell hired to validate PCAP data. Has Montgomery conned them as well?

Not to mention the exposure to charges of perjury Lindell and all the cyber experts who have already filed statements in several other cases in several states (three more scheduled to be filed next week TX, SC, AL and possibly LA) that would follow if Montgomery testifies in court and is exposed as a fraud and a conman.

Seems everybody pushing for transparency and a day in court to prove their case using Montgomery as an expert witness is a fraud and a conman and everybody pushing to keep Montgomery from testifying is not. Quite a conundrum, that.

Dominion and ES&S (plaintiffs) recently argued for a prohibition of any current or former employee being allowed to testify for the defense in their slander case against Mike Lindell and MyPillow (defendants). Seeing a pattern develop in these cases of blocking witness from testifying.

Hell, even the President of The United States told us that anyone doubting the integrity of the 2020 election was a threat to national security. Must be true because the President of The United States even said it on TV.

Like the Halderman Report detailing all the technical vulnerabilities of electronic voting equipment being held hostage by Judge Totenberg (sealed for over a year) in Georgia at the behest of the DoJ, it seems the Government is trying very hard to keep Montgomery and other experts from testifying in court for as long as possible.

If Montgomery is a fraud and conman, why would the government care if he perjured himself in open court and prove himself a fraud and a conman?

Always open to new information.

If possible, please provide sources (links to documentation, not FBI 302s or newspaper articles) for evidence Montgomery is fraud and conman.

Original sources and their contexts are important in evaluating allegations of this nature.

In the meantime, seems counterproductive on Lindell's part to file a motion to get the States Secret gag order on Montgomery lifted. That would mean Montgomery would no longer be barred from testifying in court and consequently subject to charges of perjury. Lindell has stated he had the PCAP data evaluated three times over by some of the nation's top cyber security experts. It would seem it would be one thing for Montgomery to con Lindell (who is no cyber expert), but what about all the experts Lindell hired to validate PCAP data. Has Montgomery conned them as well?

Not to mention the exposure to charges of perjury Lindell and all the cyber experts who have already filed statements in several other cases in several states (three more scheduled to filed next week) that would follow if Montgomery testifies in court and is exposed as a fraud and a conman.

Seems everybody pushing for transparency and a day in court to prove their case is a fraud and a conman and everybody pushing to keep Montgomery from testifying is not. Quite a conundrum, that.

Hell, even the President of The United States told us that anyone doubting the integrity of the 2020 election was a threat to national security. Must be true because the President of The United States said it and, most importantly, said it on TV.

Like the Halderman report detailing all the technical vulnerabilities of electronic voting equipment being held hostage by Judge Totenberg in Georgia at the behest of the DoJ, it seems the Government is trying very hard to keep Montgomery and other experts from testifying in court for as long as possible.

If Montgomery is a fraud and conman, why would the government care if he perjured himself in open court and prove himself a fraud and a conman?