Lineage is correct on it, account only has like 10 posts, probably no followers until today. Raw post number is also correctly in line with the others, if it was posted today it would be >1567611244772790272 (some random Ron DeSantis post from September 7th)

So in those senses it's legit.

That being said, Twitter probably has lots of holes that haven't been filled. As someone whose youth was spent finding flaws in peer to peer and client server communications, I'm skeptical it's a legit post, instead probably someone that either has access to the database or found a sploit in the protocol. People commenting through the months, or posts about the subject matter would easily destroy that narrative which don't exist. That's my steelman for the legitimacy argument, hax.

Lineage is correct on it, account only has like 10 posts, probably no followers until today.

So in those senses it's legit.

That being said, Twitter probably has lots of holes that haven't been filled. As someone whose youth was spent finding flaws in peer to peer and client server communications, I'm skeptical it's a legit post, instead probably someone that either has access to the database or found a sploit in the protocol. People commenting through the months, or posts about the subject matter would easily destroy that narrative which don't exist. That's my steelman for the legitimacy argument, hax.