Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

The Royals are also more inbred than an Ozarks clan of hillbillies.

Its the complete failure of Old European dynastic system. It was 100% absolute bloodline based around eldest son, rather than appointment by moot or vote of the dynasty. Its why they never rule for long, they get inbred trying to keep the bloodlines pure because that determines succession, and specifically they always had to prove purity of genetics aka "bloodline" to the founding Patriarch of their Royal Family as "fitness to rule" rather than demonstrated ability. So they just inbred rather than promoting in the dynasty based on service and merit like the Dynasty's from places like Egypt or China that lasted thousands of years did the past.

In moot or dynastic systems, new blood often entered the "royal family" in the form of promoted vassals who proved themselves to the Dynasty though loyal service. This influx of outside genes was a godsend to fighting off the ravages of incest and the deformities and literal retardation that was the results of inbreeding. Its one of the reasons why European nobility was rather ugly and known for many debilitating conditions which stood in very stark contrast to the quite genetically healthy, freely marrying subjects they ruled over.

Because Colonial European nations married their sons and daughters off to each other and never married-in people from the lower aristocracy out of terror of not having a "pure" bloodline, they became a continent-spanning genetic family of 2nd cousins. This lead to the failures of European monarchies one by one, leading to people rising up and creating republics to replace their inept rule. And now the Windsors are the last European Dynasty, and their future is dim indeed.

1 year ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

The Royals are also more inbred than an Ozarks clan of hillbillies.

Its the complete failure of Old European dynastic system. It was 100% absolute bloodline based around eldest son, rather than appointment by moot or vote of the dynasty. Its why they never rule for long, they get inbred trying to keep the bloodlines pure because that determines succession, and specifically they always had to prove purity of genetics aka "bloodline" to the founding Patriarch of their Royal Family as "fitness to rule" rather than demonstrated ability. So they just inbred rather than promoting in the dynasty based on service and merit like the Dynasty's from places like Egypt or China that lasted thousands of years did the past.

In moot or dynastic systems, new blood often entered the "royal family" in the form of promoted vassals who proved themselves to the Dynasty though loyal service. This influx of outside genes was a godsend to fighting off the ravages of incest and the deformities and literal retardation that was the results of inbreeding.

Because Colonial European nations married their sons and daughters off to each other and never married-in people from the lower aristocracy out of terror of not having a "pure" bloodline, they became a continent-spanning genetic family of 2nd cousins. This lead to the failures of European monarchies one by one, leading to people rising up and creating republics to replace their inept rule. And now the Windsors are the last European Dynasty, and their future is dim indeed.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The Royals are also more inbred than an Ozarks clan of hillbillies.

Its the complete failure of Old European dynastic system. It was 100% absolute bloodline based around eldest son, rather than appointment by moot or vote of the dynasty. Its why they never rule for long, they get inbred trying to keep the bloodlines pure because that determines succession, and specifically they always had to prove purity of genetics aka "bloodline" to the founding Patriarch of their Royal Family as "fitness to rule" rather than demonstrated ability. So they just inbred rather than promoting in the dynasty based on service and merit like the Dynasty's from places like Egypt or China that lasted thousands of years did the past.

In moot or dynastic systems, new blood often entered the "royal family" in the form of promoted vassals who proved themselves to the Dynasty though loyal service. This influx of outside genes was a godsend to fighting off the ravages of incest and the deformities and literal retardation that was the results of inbreeding.

Because Colonial European nations married their sons and daughters off to each other and never married-in people from the lower aristocracy out of terror of not having a "pure" bloodline, they became a continent-spanning genetic family of 2nd cousins.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The Royals are also more inbred than an Ozarks clan of hillbillies.

Its the complete failure of Old European dynastic system. It was 100% absolute bloodline based around eldest son, rather than appointment by moot or vote of the dynasty. Its why they never rule for long, they get inbred trying to keep the bloodlines pure because that determines succession, and specifically they always had to prove purity of blood to the founding Patriarch of their Royal Family as "fitness to rule" rather than demonstrated ability. So they just inbred rather than promoting in the dynasty based on service and merit like the Dynasty's from places like Egypt or China that lasted thousands of years did the past.

In moot or dynastic systems, new blood often entered the "royal family" in the form of promoted vassals who proved themselves to the Dynasty though loyal service. This influx of outside genes was a godsend to fighting off the ravages of incest and the deformities and literal retardation that was the results of inbreeding.

Because Colonial European nations married their sons and daughters off to each other and never married-in people from the lower aristocracy out of terror of not having a "pure" bloodline, they became a continent-spanning genetic family of 2nd cousins.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The Royals are also more inbred than an Ozarks clan of hillbillies.

Its the complete failure of Old European dynastic system. It was 100% absolute bloodline based around eldest son, rather than appointment by moot or vote of the dynasty. Its why they never rule for long, they get inbred trying to keep the bloodlines pure because that determines succession, rather than promoting in the dynasty based on service and merit like the Dynasty's from places like Egypt or China that lasted thousands of years did the past.

In moot or dynastic systems, new blood often entered the "royal family" in the form of promoted vassals who proved themselves to the Dynasty though loyal service. This influx of outside genes was a godsend to fighting off the ravages of incest and the deformities and literal retardation that was the results of inbreeding.

Because Colonial European nations married their sons and daughters off to each other and never married-in people from the lower aristocracy out of terror of not having a "pure" bloodline, they became a continent-spanning genetic family of 2nd cousins.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

The Royals are also more inbred than an Ozarks clan of hillbillies.

1 year ago
1 score