um, okay?
By the way, what are you doing? Do you have a video channel where we can go to hear about all this? Where is your newsletter mobilizing people to work on these issues you think are more important than anything else?
Have you considered at all what Flynn IS doing, instead of being obsessed or hyper-focused on what he is NOT doing?
Then, have you considered comparing yourself to Flynn and asking, if others applied the same standard and attitude I have towards Flynn but towards me, how many people would consider me 'suspicious'? How many people would trust me?
As it is, I'm a LOT more inspired by Flynn and what he is doing than I am by your - what seems to be really quite petty or narrow or arrogant - attitude on display here.
What clinched it for me with Flynn was when he clearly came out and stood behind something that I discovered for myself in a process of a number of years working in my country: That self-governance requires, demands, engagement by the population, and that simply voting is not enough. That ALL the fundamental government-related problems in our Western nations are derived from the key fact that people are NOT being engaged and doing the hard yards in order to run THEIR governments, not just to keep them accountable, but to ensure taht they function properly. By being engaged. By saying "I'll be responsible for this".
I have found no one else yet who has emphasized this point to the same extent that Flynn has, which to me, as I said, was something that I came to grasp via a number of years tackling issues in my country. Until I bumped into Flynn, I found no one who expressed this, what is to me, the most essential and critical point in our societies today, vis-a-vis government.
Aside from this point, everything else, everything, is just fluff. Distraction.
Your focus on hyper-emotionalized data points, like spirit cooking, like other things you've mentioned, says to me that you are not really aware of what's driving you here, and why you are so emotionally attached to these things. A negative attachment, yes, but it's still clearly there.
You seem upset because Flynn isn't validating your own attachment to these things. Maybe he's just a whole lot more focused on actually ending the causes of these things than you are.
So, like I said, where is YOUR video channel? Where is your telegram channel? Your facebook page and your tens of thousands of followers? Where are the organizations that you've established and created and the service done to your country to end the crimes and the cabal?
What are you actually doing to bring about an end to these things? The causes? And why do you think you're so much better than Flynn, such that you feel justified in being suspicious, criticizing or judging his work based on your own .... what, standard?
Maybe, just maybe, judging Flynn, being suspicious of him, critical of him because he's not reaching your perfect standards (standards you are setting up and then criticising him because he fails them), maybe that's really just coverage for the inadequacies you feel because you are not doing more, and are not doing anything at all near the level that Flynn is doing things at.
You seem to have such a very negative focus, although its true that text messages on a internet board probably don't really light up the whole picture, so maybe my impressions are just .... impressions. I guess you can consider this feedback. If nothing I've written resonates or makes you think, then I guess just put it aside.
Well, I've shot my mouth off, I guess. But that's what your responses make me think about. But then, I guess, I believe in Flynn. You don't. Your choice. We all make our choices and then have to live with the consequences, right?
Thanks for sharing.
um, okay?
By the way, what are you doing? Do you have a video channel where we can go to hear about all this? Where is your newsletter mobilizing people to work on these issues you think are more important than anything else?
Have you considered at all what Flynn IS doing, instead of being obsessed or hyper-focused on what he is NOT doing?
Then, have you considered comparing yourself to Flynn and asking, if others applied the same standard and attitude I have towards Flynn but towards me, how many people would consider me 'suspicious'? How many people would trust me?
As it is, I'm a LOT more inspired by Flynn and what he is doing than I am by your - what seems to be really quite petty or narrow or arrogant - attitude on display here.
What clinched it for me with Flynn was when he clearly came out and stood behind something that I discovered for myself in a process of a number of years working in my country: That self-governance requires, demands, engagement by the population, and that simply voting is not enough. That ALL the fundamental government-related problems in our Western nations are derived from the key fact that people are NOT being engaged and doing the hard yards in order to run THEIR governments, not just to keep them accountable, but to ensure taht they function properly. By being engaged. By saying "I'll be responsible for this".
I have found no one else yet who has emphasized this point to the same extent that Flynn has, which to me, as I said, was something that I came to grasp via a number of years tackling issues in my country. Until I bumped into Flynn, I found no one who expressed this, what is to me, the most essential and critical point in our societies today, vis-a-vis government.
Aside from this point, everything else, everything, is just fluff. Distraction.
Your focus on hyper-emotionalized data points, like spirit cooking, like other things you've mentioned, says to me that you are not really aware of what's driving you here, and why you are so emotionally attached to these things. A negative attachment, yes, but it's still clearly there.
You seem upset because Flynn isn't validating your own attachment to these things. Maybe he's just a whole lot more focused on actually ending the causes of these things than you are.
So, like I said, where is YOUR video channel? Where is your telegram channel? Your facebook page and your tens of thousands of followers? Where are the organizations that you've established and created and the service done to your country to end the crimes and the cabal?
What are you actually doing to bring about an end to these things? The causes? And why do you think you're so much better than Flynn, such that you feel justified in being suspicious, criticizing or judging his work based on your own .... what, standard?
Maybe, just maybe, judging Flynn, being suspicious of him, critical of him because he's not reaching your perfect standards (standards you are setting up and then criticising him because he fails them), maybe that's really just coverage for the inadequacies you feel because you are not doing more, and are not doing anything at all near the level that Flynn is doing things at.
It's really such a very negative focus, sees to me. And that makes me ask... why?
Well, I've shot my mouth off, I guess. But that's what your responses make me think about. But then, I guess, I believe in Flynn. You don't. Your choice. We all make our choices and then have to live with the consequences, right?
Thanks for sharing.
um, okay?
By the way, what are you doing? Do you have a video channel where we can go to hear about all this? Where is your newsletter mobilizing people to work on these issues you think are more important than anything else?
Have you considered at all what Flynn IS doing, instead of being obsessed or hyper-focused on what he is NOT doing?
Then, have you considered comparing yourself to Flynn and asking, if others applied the same standard and attitude I have towards Flynn but towards me, how many people would consider me 'suspicious'? How many people would trust me?
As it is, I'm a LOT more inspired by Flynn and what he is doing than I am by your - what seems to be really quite petty or narrow or arrogant - attitude on display here.
What clinched it for me with Flynn was when he clearly came out and stood behind something that I discovered for myself in a process of a number of years working in my country: That self-governance requires, demands, engagement by the population, and that simply voting is not enough. That ALL the fundamental government-related problems in our Western nations are derived from the key fact that people are NOT being engaged and doing the hard yards in order to run THEIR governments, not just to keep them accountable, but to ensure taht they function properly. By being engaged. By saying "I'll be responsible for this".
I have found no one else yet who has emphasized this point to the same extent that Flynn has, which to me, as I said, was something that I came to grasp via a number of years tackling issues in my country. Until I bumped into Flynn, I found no one who expressed this, what is to me, the most essential and critical point in our societies today, vis-a-vis government.
Aside from this point, everything else, everything, is just fluff. Distraction.
Your focus on hyper-emotionalized data points, like spirit cooking, like other things you've mentioned, says to me that you are not really aware of what's driving you here, and why you are so emotionally attached to these things. A negative attachment, yes, but it's still clearly there.
You seem upset because Flynn isn't validating your own attachment to these things. Maybe he's just a whole lot more focused on actually ending the causes of these things than you are.
So, like I said, where is YOUR video channel? Where is your telegram channel? Your facebook page and your tens of thousands of followers? Where are the organizations that you've established and created and the service done to your country to end the crimes and the cabal?
What are you actually doing to bring about an end to these things? The causes? And why do you think you're so much better than Flynn, such that you feel justified in being suspicious, criticizing or judging his work based on your own .... what, standard?
Maybe, just maybe, judging Flynn, being suspicious of him, critical of him because he's not reaching your perfect standards (standards you are setting up and then criticising him because he fails them), maybe that's really just coverage for the inadequacies you feel because you are not doing more, and are not doing anything at all near the level that Flynn is doing things at.
It's really such a very negative focus, sees to me. And that makes me ask... why?
um, okay?
By the way, what are you doing? Do you have a video channel where we can go to hear about all this? Where is your newsletter mobilizing people to work on these issues you think are more important than anything else?
Have you considered at all what Flynn IS doing, instead of what he is not doing?
Then, have you considered comparing yourself to Flynn, and asking, if others applied the same standard and attitude I have but towards me, how many people would consider me 'suspicious'?
As it is, I'm a LOT more inspired by Flynn and what he is doing than I am by your - what seems to be really quite petty or narrow or arrogant - attitude on display here.
What clinched it for me with Flynn was when he clearly came out and stood behind something that I discovered for myself in a process of a number of years working in my country: That self-governance requires, demands, engagement by the population, and that simply voting is not enough. That the fundamental government-related problems in our Western nations are derived from the key factor that people are NOT being engaged and doing the hard yards in order to run government and, not just keep it accountable, but to ensure it functions properly. By being engaged.
I have found no one else yet who has emphasized this point to the same extent that Flynn has, which to me, as I said, was something that I came to grasp via a number of years tackling issues in my country. Aside from this point, everything else, everything, is just fluff. Distraction.
Your focus on hyper-emotionalized data points, like spirit cooking, like other things you've mentioned, says to me that you are not really aware of what's driving you here, and why you are so emotionally attached to these things. A negative attachment, yes, but it's still clearly there.
You seem upset because Flynn isn't validating your own attachment to these things. Maybe he's just a whole lot more focused on actually ending the causes of these things than you are.
So, like I said, where is YOUR video channel? Where is your telegram channel? Your facebook page and your tens of thousands of followers? Where are the organizations that you've established and created and the service done to your country to end the crimes and the cabal?
What are you actually doing to bring about an end to these things? The causes? And why do you think you're so much better than Flynn, such that you feel justified in being suspicious, criticizing or judging his work based on your own .... what, standard?
Maybe, just maybe, judging Flynn, being suspicious of him, critical of him because he's not reaching your perfect standards (standards you are setting up and then criticising him because he fails them), maybe that's really just coverage for the inadequacies you feel because you are not doing more, and are not doing anything at all near the level that Flynn is doing things at.
It's really such a very negative focus, sees to me. And that makes me ask... why?