Since these buildings were cited having asbestos and ordered to be removed, it is plausible asbestos contamination may have caused cancers. However, asbestos causes an unique type of cancer called mesothelioma and lung cancer. It is determinable diagnosis of causation. The asbestos in those buildings turns out to be one of the major motives of the crime.
Regarding the nuke theory "debunked" statement. Debunked by who? The Fake News fact checkers? It's a fact that radioactive particulates was widely detected, but is still denied by these so called "fact checkers" and the government. The Department of Energy (DOE) collected water samples from the basement of Building 6 eleven days after 9/11 that showed tritium levels 55 times greater than background. How does this suddenly occur? For each building, some 1200 ft. of material went missing. Watch this short video and the ridiculous statement that steel beams were turned to dust. Compare a sky scraper that has collapsed as a result of an earthquake or other natural disaster and you will see that large portions remain intact after the fall.
Nano-thermite has been oversold as the answer to how those buildings imploded into dust. To begin with, nano-thermite doesn't work this way. Since it is a principle of materials science that an explosive can destroy a material only if it has a detonation velocity equal to or greater than the speed of sound in that material, where the speed of sound in concrete is 3,200 m/s and in steel 6,100 m/s, while the highest detonation velocity that has been attributed to nanothermite is 895 m/s, it should be obvious: You can’t get there from there!
Furthermore, the explosives that demolished the Twin Towers were so powerful that North Tower debris was ejected up at a 45° angle and out over 600 feet into the Winter Garden. This feat alone puts an end to the notion that the buildings were “dustified” where they stood or that an incendiary like nano-thermite was responsible for the destruction of two 500,000 ton 110 story skyscrapers or that the buildings collapsed due to fire. No way, no how. Impossible!
Engineers estimate that 1/3 of the buildings were completely vaporized. And as Judy Wood likes to point out no toilets were found in the rubble. She has been greatly attacked by the official narrative spokespeople. Yet, the many incredible scenes and oddities of this tragedy are left unexplained and denied to ever have occurred. Let's look at some of them. 90% of the debris from the Twin Towers destruction landed outside the building’s footprints. What type of explosives could cause this sort of damage? The only thing known to man that can explain this is nuclear bombs. And there was a surviving witness who was in the WTC several stories down in the sub-level that experienced the explosions under him several minutes before the jets flew in the building. This witness saw the elevator door open and the victim there he described as having skin melted off his body.
Then there are over a thousand melted cars and trucks as far as 7 blocks away from WTC along the East River. Some of these photos show burning cars and paper everywhere that strangely doesn't burn. There is no way on God's green earth that these cars and trucks were due to the collapse of the WTC buildings. I"f you look at the map, these vehicles were shielded by many blocks of buildings unaffected by the WTC collapse.
Since these buildings were cited having asbestos and ordered to be removed, it is plausible asbestos contamination may have caused cancers. However, asbestos causes an unique type of cancer called mesothelioma and lung cancer. It is determinable diagnosis of causation. The asbestos in those buildings turns out to be one of the major motives of the crime.
Regarding the nuke theory "debunked" statement. Debunked by who? The Fake News fact checkers? It's a fact that radioactive particulates was widely detected, but is still denied by these so called "fact checkers" and the government. The Department of Energy (DOE) collected water samples from the basement of Building 6 eleven days after 9/11 that showed tritium levels 55 times greater than background. How does this suddenly occur? For each building, some 1200 ft. of material went missing. Watch this short video and the ridiculous statement that steel beams were turned to dust. Compare a sky scraper that has collapsed as a result of an earthquake or other natural disaster and you will see that large portions remain intact after the fall.
Nano-thermite has been oversold as the answer to how those buildings imploded into dust. To begin with, nano-thermite doesn't work this way. Since it is a principle of materials science that an explosive can destroy a material only if it has a detonation velocity equal to or greater than the speed of sound in that material, where the speed of sound in concrete is 3,200 m/s and in steel 6,100 m/s, while the highest detonation velocity that has been attributed to nanothermite is 895 m/s, it should be obvious: You can’t get there from there!
Furthermore, the explosives that demolished the Twin Towers were so powerful that North Tower debris was ejected up at a 45° angle and out over 600 feet into the Winter Garden. This feat alone puts an end to the notion that the buildings were “dustified” where they stood or that an incendiary like nano-thermite was responsible for the destruction of two 500,000 ton 110 story skyscrapers or that the buildings collapsed due to fire. No way, no how. Impossible!
Engineers estimate that 1/3 of the buildings were completely vaporized. And as Judy Wood likes to point out no toilets were found in the rubble. She has been greatly attacked by the official narrative spokespeople. Yet, the many incredible scenes and oddities of this tragedy are left unexplained and denied to ever have occurred. Let's look at some of them. 90% of the debris from the Twin Towers destruction landed outside the building’s footprints. What type of explosives could cause this sort of damage? The only thing known to man that can explain this is nuclear bombs. And there was a surviving witness who was in the WTC several stories down in the sub-level that experienced the explosions under him several minutes before the jets flew in the building. This witness saw the elevator door open and the victim there he described as having skin melted off his body.
Then there are over a thousand melted cars and trucks as far as 7 blocks away from WTC along the East River. Some of these photos show burning cars and paper everywhere that strangely doesn't burn. There is no way on God's green earth that these cars and trucks were due to the collapse of the WTC buildings. I"f you look at the map, these vehicles were shielded by many blocks of buildings unaffected by the WTC collapse.
Since these buildings were cited having asbestos and ordered to be removed, it is plausible asbestos contamination may have caused cancers. However, asbestos causes an unique type of cancer called mesothelioma and lung cancer. It is determinable diagnosis of causation. The asbestos in those buildings turns out to be one of the major motives of the crime.
Regarding the nuke theory "debunked" statement. Debunked by who? The Fake News fact checkers? It's a fact that radioactive particulates was widely detected, but is still denied by these so called "fact checkers" and the government. The Department of Energy (DOE) collected water samples from the basement of Building 6 eleven days after 9/11 that showed tritium levels 55 times greater than background. How does this suddenly occur? For each building, some 1200 ft. of material went missing. Watch this short video and the ridiculous statement that steel beams were turned to dust. Compare a sky scraper that has collapsed as a result of an earthquake or other natural disaster and you will see that large portions remain intact after the fall.
Nano-thermite has been oversold as the answer to how those buildings imploded into dust. To begin with, nano-thermite doesn't work this way. Since it is a principle of materials science that an explosive can destroy a material only if it has a detonation velocity equal to or greater than the speed of sound in that material, where the speed of sound in concrete is 3,200 m/s and in steel 6,100 m/s, while the highest detonation velocity that has been attributed to nanothermite is 895 m/s, it should be obvious: You can’t get there from there!
Furthermore, the explosives that demolished the Twin Towers were so powerful that North Tower debris was ejected up at a 45° angle and out over 600 feet into the Winter Garden. This feat alone puts an end to the notion that the buildings were “dustified” where they stood or that an incendiary like nano-thermite was responsible for the destruction of two 500,000 ton 110 story skyscrapers or that the buildings collapsed due to fire. No way, no how. Impossible!
Engineers estimate that 1/3 of the buildings were completely vaporized. And as Judy Wood likes to point out no toilets were found in the rubble. She has been greatly attacked by the official narrative spokes people. Yet, the many incredible scenes and oddities of this tragedy are left unexplained and denied to ever have occurred. Let's look at some of them. 90% of the debris from the Twin Towers destruction landed outside the building’s footprints. What type of explosives could cause this sort of damage? The only thing known to man that can explain this is nuclear bombs. And there was a surviving witness who was in the WTC several stories down in the sub-level that experienced the explosions under him several minutes before the jets flew in the building. This witness saw the elevator door open and the victim there he described as having skin melted off his body.
Then there are over a thousand melted cars and trucks as far as 7 blocks away from WTC along the East River. Some of these photos show burning cars and paper everywhere that strangely doesn't burn. There is no way on God's green earth that these cars and trucks were due to the collapse of the WTC buildings. I"f you look at the map, these vehicles were shielded by many blocks of buildings unaffected by the WTC collapse.
Since these buildings were cited having asbestos and ordered to be removed, it is plausible asbestos contamination may have caused cancers. However, asbestos causes an unique type of cancer called mesothelioma and lung cancer. It is determinable diagnosis of causation. The asbestos in those buildings turns out to be one of the major motives of the crime.
Regarding the nuke theory "debunked" statement. Debunked by who? The Fake News fact checkers? It's a fact that radioactive particulates was widely detected, but is still denied by these so called "fact checkers" and the government. The Department of Energy (DOE) collected water samples from the basement of Building 6 eleven days after 9/11 that showed tritium levels 55 times greater than background. How does this suddenly occur? For each building, some 1200 ft. of material went missing. Watch this short video and the ridiculous statement that steel beams were turned to dust. Compare a sky scraper that has collapsed as a result of an earthquake or other natural disaster and you will see that large portions remain intact after the fall.
Nano-thermite has been oversold as the answer to how those buildings imploded into dust. To begin with, nano-thermite doesn't work this way. Since it is a principle of materials science that an explosive can destroy a material only if it has a detonation velocity equal to or greater than the speed of sound in that material, where the speed of sound in concrete is 3,200 m/s and in steel 6,100 m/s, while the highest detonation velocity that has been attributed to nanothermite is 895 m/s, it should be obvious: You can’t get there from there!
Furthermore, the explosives that demolished the Twin Towers were so powerful that North Tower debris was ejected up at a 45° angle and out over 600 feet into the Winter Garden. This feat alone puts an end to the notion that the buildings were “dustified” where they stood or that an incendiary like nano-thermite was responsible for the destruction of two 500,000 ton 110 story skyscrapers or that the buildings collapsed due to fire. No way, no how. Impossible!
Engineers estimate that 1/3 of the buildings were completely vaporized. And as Judy Wood likes to point out no toilets were found in the rubble. 90% of the debris from the Twin Towers destruction landed outside the building’s footprints. What type of explosives could cause this sort of damage? The only thing known to man that can explain this is nuclear bombs. And there was a surviving witness who was in the WTC several stories down in the sub-level that experienced the explosions under him several minutes before the jets flew in the building. This witness saw the elevator door open and the victim there he described as having skin melted off ho body.
Then there are over a thousand melted cars and trucks as far as 7 blocks away from WTC along the East River. Some of these photos show burning cars and paper everywhere that strangely doesn't burn. There is no way on God's green earth that these cars and trucks were due to the collapse of the WTC buildings. I"f you look at the map, these vehicles were shielded by many blocks of buildings unaffected by the WTC collapse.
Since these buildings were cited having asbestos and ordered to be removed, it is plausible asbestos contamination may have caused cancers. However, asbestos causes an unique type of cancer called mesothelioma and lung cancer. It is determinable diagnosis of causation. The asbestos in those buildings turns out to be one of the major motives of the crime.
Regarding the nuke theory "debunked" statement. Debunked by who? The Fake News fact checkers? It's a fact that radioactive particulates was widely detected, but is still denied by these so called "fact checkers" and the government. The Department of Energy (DOE) collected water samples from the basement of Building 6 eleven days after 9/11 that showed tritium levels 55 times greater than background. How does this suddenly occur? For each building, some 1200 ft. of material went missing. Watch this short video and the ridiculous statement that steel beams were turned to dust. Compare a sky scraper that has collapsed as a result of an earthquake or other natural disaster and you will see that large portions remain intact after the fall.
Nano-thermite has been oversold as the answer to how those buildings imploded into dust. To begin with, nano-thermite doesn't work this. Since it is a principle of materials science that an explosive can destroy a material only if it has a detonation velocity equal to or greater than the speed of sound in that material, where the speed of sound in concrete is 3,200 m/s and in steel 6,100 m/s, while the highest detonation velocity that has been attributed to nanothermite is 895 m/s, it should be obvious: You can’t get there from there!
Furthermore, the explosives that demolished the Twin Towers were so powerful that North Tower debris was ejected up at a 45° angle and out over 600 feet into the Winter Garden. This feat alone puts an end to the notion that the buildings were “dustified” where they stood or that an incendiary like nano-thermite was responsible for the destruction of two 500,000 ton 110 story skyscrapers or that the buildings collapsed due to fire. No way, no how. Impossible!
Engineers estimate that 1/3 of the buildings were completely vaporized. And as Judy Wood likes to point out no toilets were found in the rubble. 90% of the debris from the Twin Towers destruction landed outside the building’s footprints. What type of explosives could cause this sort of damage? The only thing known to man that can explain this is nuclear bombs. And there was a surviving witness who was in the WTC several stories down in the sub-level that experienced the explosions under him several minutes before the jets flew in the building. This witness saw the elevator door open and the victim there he described as having skin melted off ho body.
Then there are over a thousand melted cars and trucks as far as 7 blocks away from WTC along the East River. Some of these photos show burning cars and paper everywhere that strangely doesn't burn. There is no way on God's green earth that these cars and trucks were due to the collapse of the WTC buildings. I"f you look at the map, these vehicles were shielded by many blocks of buildings unaffected by the WTC collapse.
Debunked by who? The Fake News fact checkers? It's a fact that radioactive particulates was widely detected, but is still denied by these so called "fact checkers" and the government. The Department of Energy (DOE) collected water samples from the basement of Building 6 eleven days after 9/11 that showed tritium levels 55 times greater than background. How does this prove a nuke? For each building, some 1200 ft. of material went missing. Watch this short video and the ridiculous statement that steel beams were turned to dust. Compare a sky scraper that has collapsed as a result of an earthquake or other natural disaster and you will see that large portions remain intact after the fall.
Nano-thermite has been oversold as the answer to how those buildings imploded into dust. To begin with, nano-thermite doesn't work this. Since it is a principle of materials science that an explosive can destroy a material only if it has a detonation velocity equal to or greater than the speed of sound in that material, where the speed of sound in concrete is 3,200 m/s and in steel 6,100 m/s, while the highest detonation velocity that has been attributed to nanothermite is 895 m/s, it should be obvious: You can’t get there from there!
Furthermore, the explosives that demolished the Twin Towers were so powerful that North Tower debris was ejected up at a 45° angle and out over 600 feet into the Winter Garden. This feat alone puts an end to the notion that the buildings were “dustified” where they stood or that an incendiary like nano-thermite was responsible for the destruction of two 500,000 ton 110 story skyscrapers or that the buildings collapsed due to fire. No way, no how. Impossible!
Engineers estimate that 1/3 of the buildings were completely vaporized. And as Judy Wood likes to point out no toilets were found in the rubble. 90% of the debris from the Twin Towers destruction landed outside the building’s footprints. What type of explosives could cause this sort of damage? The only thing known to man that can explain this is nuclear bombs. And there was a surviving witness who was in the WTC several stories down in the sub-level that experienced the explosions under him several minutes before the jets flew in the building. This witness saw the elevator door open and the victim there he described as having skin melted off ho body.
Then there are over a thousand melted cars and trucks as far as 7 blocks away from WTC along the East River. Some of these photos show burning cars and paper everywhere that strangely doesn't burn. There is no way on God's green earth that these cars and trucks were due to the collapse of the WTC buildings. I"f you look at the map, these vehicles were shielded by many blocks of buildings unaffected by the WTC collapse.