https://rumble.com/v1tza4q-juan-o-savin-shocking-big-news-update-nov-12.2022-trump-news.html
So for the link above I would argue that that is not "another Juan" at all, the guy speaking in the video does not claim to be Juan and starts off by saying "Welcome to Patriot Underground" which is another channel and they do not claim to be Juan, as far as I know. This "Trump News Channel" is just one of the many on Rumble that repost videos and put misleading titles on them. Definitely muddies the water in the info war but not hard to see that that is what is going on. When it comes to the two Juans theories I thought that there was an original 107 from like 2017 to 2019 or 2020 and that is the one people point to as Vincent Fusca or whatever his name is, I believe he was even at a Trump state of the union, and then the current Juan, the supposed Wayne Willot one, is the current one who has even alluded to the other Juan in videos.
Regardless, when I found out about 107 earlier this year I tried to dig on him and the only things I could find were MSM hit pieces claiming he is Wayne Willot and he made his fame investigating Clinton scandals in Arkansas such as the rumored Mena trafficking operations (drugs and kids). This alone made me go "huh" and tipped the scale towards WH for me while realizing it could be a BH piece to corroborate such an extrapolation. The lack of supporting information otherwise further deepens the mystery. In interviews Juan has brought this up in roundabout ways that confirm his work in Arkansas investigating the Clintons. All I know is I am one of the apparent few who is interested enough in what he talks about to give a listen and discern for myself. Everyone is so quick to make out that he says xyz is going to happen but in my experience that could not be further from the truth.
To me it seems like he lays out the battlefield and theorizes on what could come next based on his experience and supposed connections and nothing further. He did datefag about Trump being reinstalled but that is plausible to me that it was disinfo to throw off / worry the BHs. Nowadays it seems he offers as much concrete info as the immediate detractors offer here but, in my opinion, he is still worth a listen while not being held up on a pedestal, just like all the contrarians here have some salient points to consider but not take as fact without seeking for yourself.
https://rumble.com/v1tza4q-juan-o-savin-shocking-big-news-update-nov-12.2022-trump-news.html
So for the link above I would argue that that is not "another Juan" at all, the guy speaking in the video does not claim to be Juan and I believe he has his own channel because his is familiar to me and that this "Trump News Channel" is just one of the many on Rumble that repost videos and put misleading titles on them. Definitely muddies the water in the info war but not hard to see that that is what is going on. When it comes to the two Juans theories I thought that there was an original 107 from like 2017 to 2019 or 2020 and that is the one people point to as Vincent Fusca or whatever his name is, I believe he was even at a Trump state of the union, and then the current Juan, the supposed Wayne Willot one, is the current one who has even alluded to the other Juan in videos.
Regardless, when I found out about 107 earlier this year I tried to dig on him and the only things I could find were MSM hit pieces claiming he is Wayne Willot and he made his fame investigating Clinton scandals in Arkansas such as the rumored Mena trafficking operations (drugs and kids). This alone made me go "huh" and tipped the scale towards WH for me while realizing it could be a BH piece to corroborate such an extrapolation. The lack of supporting information otherwise further deepens the mystery. In interviews Juan has brought this up in roundabout ways that confirm his work in Arkansas investigating the Clintons. All I know is I am one of the apparent few who is interested enough in what he talks about to give a listen and discern for myself. Everyone is so quick to make out that he says xyz is going to happen but in my experience that could not be further from the truth.
To me it seems like he lays out the battlefield and theorizes on what could come next based on his experience and supposed connections and nothing further. He did datefag about Trump being reinstalled but that is plausible to me that it was disinfo to throw off / worry the BHs. Nowadays it seems he offers as much concrete info as the immediate detractors offer here but, in my opinion, he is still worth a listen while not being held up on a pedestal, just like all the contrarians here have some salient points to consider but not take as fact without seeking for yourself.
https://rumble.com/v1tza4q-juan-o-savin-shocking-big-news-update-nov-12.2022-trump-news.html
So for the link above I would argue that that is not "another Juan" at all, the guy speaking in the video does not claim to be Juan and I believe he has his own channel because his is familiar to me and that this "Trump News Channel" is just one of the many on Rumble that repost videos and put misleading titles on them. Definitely muddies the water in the info war but not hard to see that that is what is going on. When it comes to the two Juans theories I thought that there was an original 107 from like 2017 to 2019 or 2020 and that is the one people point to as Vincent Fusca or whatever his name is, I believe he was even at a Trump state of the union, and then the current Juan, the supposed Wayne Willot one, is the current one who has even alluded to the other Juan in videos.
Regardless, when I found out about 107 earlier this year I tried to dig on him and the only things I could find were MSM hit pieces claiming he is Wayne Willot and he made his fame investigating Clinton scandals in Arkansas such as the rumored Mena trafficking operations (drugs and kids). This alone made me go "huh" and tipped the scale towards WH for me while realizing it could be a BH piece to corroborate such an extrapolation. The lack of supporting information otherwise further deepens the mystery. In interviews Juan has brought this up in roundabout ways that confirm his work in Arkansas investigating the Clintons. All I know is I am one of the apparent few who is interested enough in what he talks about to give a listen and discern for myself. Everyone is so quick to make out that he says xyz is going to happen but in my experience that could not be further from the truth.
To me it seems like he lays out the battlefield and theorizes on what could come next based on his experience and supposed connections and nothing further. He did datefag about Trump being reinstalled but that is plausible to me that it was disinfo to throw off / worry the BHs. Nowadays it seems he offers as much concrete info as the immediate detractors offer here but is still worth a listen but not to be held up on a pedestal, just like all the contrarians here, in my opinion.
https://rumble.com/v1tza4q-juan-o-savin-shocking-big-news-update-nov-12.2022-trump-news.html
So for the link above I would argue that that is not "another Juan" at all, the guy speaking in the video does not claim to be Juan at all and I believe he has his own channel and that this "Trump News Channel" is just one of the many on Rumble that repost videos and put misleading titles on them. Definitely muddies the water in the info war but not hard to see that that is what is going on. When it comes to the two Juans theories I thought that there was an original 107 from like 2017 to 2019 or 2020 and that is the one people point to as Vincent Fusca or whatever his name is, I believe he was even at a Trump state of the union, and then the current Juan, the supposed Wayne Willot one, is the current one who has even alluded to the other Juan in videos.
Regardless, when I found out about 107 earlier this year I tried to dig on him and the only things I could find were MSM hit pieces claiming he is Wayne Willot and he made his fame investigating Clinton scandals in Arkansas such as the rumored Mena trafficking operations (drugs and kids). This alone made me go "huh" and tipped the scale towards WH for me while realizing it could be a BH piece to corroborate such an extrapolation. The lack of supporting information otherwise further deepens the mystery. In interviews Juan has brought this up in roundabout ways that confirm his work in Arkansas investigating the Clintons. All I know is I am one of the apparent few who is interested enough in what he talks about to give a listen and discern for myself. Everyone is so quick to make out that he says xyz is going to happen but in my experience that could not be further from the truth.
To me it seems like he lays out the battlefield and theorizes on what could come next based on his experience and supposed connections and nothing further. He offers as much concrete info as the immediate detractors offer here at the end of the day. Worth a listen but not to be held up on a pedestal in my opinion.