I hesitate with the long response, yet I believe it is very important. Here it is:

Government has no Godly business in regulating marriage, period. Yet, it is made so by volunteering to take a marriage license. If the government represents God's Laws, then the marriage license will follow the Divine Order intended from our Creator. If the government is polluted and does not represent God, then we will see abominations to God's Divine Order.

The marriage license is not, as many suppose, an innocuous “piece of paper”, but rather a voluntary, three party (The state is the “silent third party”; the party Grantor), civil, commercial contract. The purpose of which was to permit, as a privilege, the act of “inter-marriage” (See definition below in Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Ed.). The first such license was reputed to have been issued in Mississippi circa 1864.

This license becomes the “civil contract” over which a court has jurisdiction in a divorce. It is the only thing over which the court has a jurisdiction. The License, the “civil contract” becomes the basis in law for a divorce court, a court of equity jurisdiction, to “divorce” a couple. Divorce does not exist even in form, let alone in substance under the Common Law.   

A marriage without the voluntary state license is thus a marriage, of right, and not of governmental grant of privilege. Since divorce can be seen as a “Provision of the flesh and the lust thereof”, and since the license is the thing that empowers a divorce court to render a judgment of divorce (in form, but not in substance as they merely modify the provisions of that “civil contract”, the marriage license. The State still remains in the position of that “silent third party”, even after the divorce, unless there was no marriage license to begin with, or if the marriage license was appropriately and lawfully rescinded before or at the time of the divorce In that case, there is no civil contract, and therefore, no basis, no nexus of jurisdiction for the “divorce” court.    As supreme court decisions tell us clearly, a divorce court does not sever the marriage vows, the “ecclesiastical obligations of marriage” between two Christians. The divorce court fully recognizes that it has no jurisdiction, constitutional or statutory over those marriage vows.

They are as intact the day after the “divorce” as the day they were made:

(Excerpted from Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Ed.)

1.    License.    "The permission by competent authority to do an act, which without    such    permission,    would    be illegal, a trespass, or a tort."

"Permission to do something which without the license would not be allowable. Leave to do thing which licensor could prevent."

"Permission to do a particular thing, to exercise a certain privilege or to carry on a particular business or to pursue a certain occupation."

2.Marriage License.   " A license or permission granted by public authority to persons who intend to intermarry."

3. lntermarriage.    "See Miscegenation"

4.    Miscegenation.    "Mixture of races;    marriage between persons of different races as between a white person and a Negro".

The above was quoted verbatim.

We live in an evil world run by despicable psychopaths. Everything is being exposed. So one might ask what is a license? Here's a historical account of licensing in Culpeper, Virginia.

In March of 1775, several people witnessed a tragic event unfold at the middle of an American town square. All could see an ill-fated minister tied to a whipping post, his back laid bare, skin cut open and bloody with his ribs exposed. He was scourged mercilessly, similar to Jesus once experienced, with whips laced with metal.    However on this particular day, a young man happened to ride into this small town of Culpeper, Virginia and was shocked by what he saw.    This young man was quoted as saying: “When they stopped beating him, I could see the bones of his rib cage. I turned to someone and asked what the man had done to deserve such a beating as this.” The reply given him was that the minister being scourged was one of twelve people who refused to take a license. Three days later they scourged him to death.

This is the story of how a license often becomes an arbitrary control by government to make an absolute right, which is ordained by our Creator in Heaven, into a statutory privilege of carnal politicians.

My research concerning the marriage license should be examined with discerning minds. I recommend everyone to verify this text for themselves. All who seek the truth should understand the methods used here for authenticating works of antiquity. The scientific Tests of Historiography have been instrumental for me in unraveling the misinformation and propaganda, which emanates throughout our society. The truth is neither tender nor kind. It is the supreme destroyer of lives. Yet, it is a divine and revolutionary construct that returns the humble and strong to our Creator's grace.

I hesitate with the long response, yet I believe it is very important. Here it is:

Government has no Godly business in regulating marriage, period. Yet, it is made so by volunteering to take a marriage license. If the government represents God's Laws, then the marriage license will follow the Divine Order intended from our Creator. If the government is polluted and does not represent God, then we will see abominations to God's Divine Order.

The marriage license is not, as many suppose, an innocuous “piece of paper”, but rather a voluntary, three party (The state is the “silent third party”; the party Grantor), civil, commercial contract. The purpose of which was to permit, as a privilege, the act of “inter-marriage” (See definition below in Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Ed.). The first such license was reputed to have been issued in Mississippi circa 1864.

This license becomes the “civil contract” over which a court has jurisdiction in a divorce. It is the only thing over which the court has a jurisdiction. The License, the “civil contract” becomes the basis in law for a divorce court, a court of equity jurisdiction, to “divorce” a couple. Divorce does not exist even in form, let alone in substance under the Common Law.   

A marriage without the voluntary state license is thus a marriage, of right, and not of governmental grant of privilege. Since divorce can be seen as a “Provision of the flesh and the lust thereof”, and since the license is the thing that empowers a divorce court to render a judgment of divorce (in form, but not in substance as they merely modify the provisions of that “civil contract”, the marriage license. The State still remains in the position of that “silent third party”, even after the divorce, unless there was no marriage license to begin with, or if the marriage license was appropriately and lawfully rescinded before or at the time of the divorce In that case, there is no civil contract, and therefore, no basis, no nexus of jurisdiction for the “divorce” court.    As supreme court decisions tell us clearly, a divorce court does not sever the marriage vows, the “ecclesiastical obligations of marriage” between two Christians. The divorce court fully recognizes that it has no jurisdiction, constitutional or statutory over those marriage vows.

They are as intact the day after the “divorce” as the day they were made:

(Excerpted from Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Ed.)

1.    License.    "The permission by competent authority to do an act, which without    such    permission,    would    be illegal, a trespass, or a tort."

"Permission to do something which without the license would not be allowable. Leave to do thing which licensor could prevent."

"Permission to do a particular thing, to exercise a certain privilege or to carry on a particular business or to pursue a certain occupation."

2. Marriage License.   " A license or permission granted by public authority to persons who intend to intermarry."

3. lntermarriage.    "See Miscegenation"

4.    Miscegenation.    "Mixture of races;    marriage between persons of different races as between a white person and a Negro".

The above was quoted verbatim.

We live in an evil world run by despicable psychopaths. Everything is being exposed. So one might ask what is a license? Here's a historical account of licensing in Culpeper, Virginia.

In March of 1775, several people witnessed a tragic event unfold at the middle of an American town square. All could see an ill-fated minister tied to a whipping post, his back laid bare, skin cut open and bloody with his ribs exposed. He was scourged mercilessly, similar to Jesus once experienced, with whips laced with metal.    However on this particular day, a young man happened to ride into this small town of Culpeper, Virginia and was shocked by what he saw.    This young man was quoted as saying: “When they stopped beating him, I could see the bones of his rib cage. I turned to someone and asked what the man had done to deserve such a beating as this.” The reply given him was that the minister being scourged was one of twelve people who refused to take a license. Three days later they scourged him to death.

This is the story of how a license often becomes an arbitrary control by government to make an absolute right, which is ordained by our Creator in Heaven, into a statutory privilege of carnal politicians.

My research concerning the marriage license should be examined with discerning minds. I recommend everyone to verify the sources I list at the end of this text for themselves. All who seek the truth should understand the methods used here for authenticating works of antiquity. The scientific Tests of Historiography have been instrumental for me in unraveling the misinformation and propaganda, which emanates throughout our society. The truth is neither tender nor kind. It is the supreme destroyer of lives. Yet, it is a divine and revolutionary construct that returns the humble and strong to our Creator's grace.