This is a source that you trust as honest and authoritative enough to present at GAW? If you already know that this person is someone not respected on GAW, why would you choose them as a compelling source for reliable information? This again speaks to the level of evidence for these claims.

I watched the video and of course it's nothing new at all. There are two subjects. Chem trails and cloud seeding. They may have a couple things in common. But the conspiracy theory that people are referring to here is that if CHEM trails. As in chemicals surreptitiously showered onto Americans for coercive or otherwise corrective purposes.

But I think you know this.

This is a source that you trust as honest and authoritative enough to present at GAW? If you already know that this person is someone not respected on GAW, why would you choose them as a compelling source for reliable information? This again speaks to the level of evidence for these claims.