What do you mean? Russia has achieved its objective (land corridor to Crimea) and is just bleeding the Ukraine and Nato dry of soldiers and weapons (de-Nazification).

If Russia were to have taken all of Ukraine already it would have provoked retaliation from other countries because normies would have freaked out at Russias overreach, instead they acheived securing the most Russian areas with the most natural gas potential along with securing the strategic land corridor to Crimea (what they were really after strategic-wise, protecting the Russians in Ukraine is just a good cover) while playing quite the expert optics game to counter globohomo narratives. Remember that this would be WWIII if globohomo has its way, but Russia is purposely slow walking this to ensure that this does not happen by making normies see a glaring contradiction if they look.

Their effort was not bigger and more destructive in order to reduce civilian casualties due to them, and I would say they have succeeded and did exactly what they need to do: they showed they could get right up on Kiev and take it if they want. They strategically pulled out of the areas around Kiev and Kharkiv to strengthen the real objective: Donbass, Zaporozhye, and Kherson.

Ukraine never pushed them back, the only times Ukraine really pushes Russia back is after an influx of foreign "Ukrainian" fighters who are allowed to advance into a trap that results in their obliteration. Russia is fighting for the hearts and minds of the eastern Ukranians and is winning in terms of optics in those areas, regardless of what the propagandists are attempting to brainwash the rest of the world into believing.

Ukraine could surrender tomorrow and Russia would have achieved its objective. It is only being drug out by Ukraine and Nato and in doing so Russia will have an opportunity to take Odessa and push across the Dneipr River, not that they necessarily need nor want to, but it will be the result of Ukraine still not surrendering and Russia injecting about 300k more soldiers into the effort in the next month or so.

What do you mean? Russia has achieved its objective (land corridor to Crimea) and is just bleeding the Ukraine and Nato dry of soldiers and weapons (de-Nazification).

If Russia were to have taken all of Ukraine already it would have provoked retaliation from other countries because normies would have freaked out at Russias overreach, instead they acheived securing the most Russian areas with the most natural gas potential along with securing the strategic land corridor to Crimea (what they were really after strategic-wise, protecting the Russians in Ukraine is just a good cover) while playing quite the expert optics game to counter globohomo narratives.

Their effort was not bigger and more destructive in order to reduce civilian casualties due to them, and I would say they have succeeded and did exactly what they need to do: they showed they could get right up on Kiev and take it if they want. They strategically pulled out of the areas around Kiev and Kharkiv to strengthen the real objective: Donbass, Zaporozhye, and Kherson.

Ukraine never pushed them back, the only times Ukraine really pushes Russia back is after an influx of foreign "Ukrainian" fighters who are allowed to advance into a trap that results in their obliteration. Russia is fighting for the hearts and minds of the eastern Ukranians and is winning in terms of optics in those areas, regardless of what the propagandists are attempting to brainwash the rest of the world into believing.

Ukraine could surrender tomorrow and Russia would have achieved its objective. It is only being drug out by Ukraine and Nato and in doing so Russia will have an opportunity to take Odessa and push across the Dneipr River, not that they necessarily need nor want to, but it will be the result of Ukraine still not surrendering and Russia injecting about 300k more soldiers into the effort in the next month or so.

What do you mean? Russia has achieved its objective (land corridor to Crimea) and is just bleeding the Ukraine and Nato dry of soldiers and weapons (de-Nazification).

If Russia were to have taken all of Ukraine already it would have provoked retaliation from other countries because normies would have freaked out at Russias overreach, instead they acheived securing the most Russian areas with the most natural gas potential along with securing the strategic land corridor to Crimea (what they were really after strategic-wise, protecting the Russians in Ukraine is just a good cover) while playing quite the optics game to counter globohomo narratives.

Their effort was not bigger and more destructive in order to reduce civilian casualties due to them, and I would say they have succeeded and did exactly what they need to do: they showed they could get right up on Kiev and take it if they want. They strategically pulled out of the areas around Kiev and Kharkiv to strengthen the real objective: Donbass, Zaporozhye, and Kherson.

Ukraine never pushed them back, the only times Ukraine really pushes Russia back is after an influx of foreign "Ukrainian" fighters who are allowed to advance into a trap that results in their obliteration. Russia is fighting for the hearts and minds of the eastern Ukranians and is winning in terms of optics in those areas, regardless of what the propagandists are attempting to brainwash the rest of the world into believing.

Ukraine could surrender tomorrow and Russia would have achieved its objective. It is only being drug out by Ukraine and Nato and in doing so Russia will have an opportunity to take Odessa and push across the Dneipr River, not that they necessarily need nor want to, but it will be the result of Ukraine still not surrendering and Russia injecting about 300k more soldiers into the effort in the next month or so.

What do you mean? Russia has achieved its objective (land corridor to Crimea) and is just bleeding the Ukraine and Nato dry of soldiers and weapons (de-Nazification).

If Russia were to have taken all of Ukraine already it would have provoked retaliation from other countries, instead they acheived securing the most Russian areas with the most natural gas potential along with securing the strategic land corridor to Crimea (what they were really after strategic-wise, protecting the Russians in Ukraine is just a good cover).

Their effort was not bigger and more destructive in order to reduce civilian casualties due to them, and I would say they have succeeded and did exactly what they need to do: they showed they could get right up on Kiev and take it if they want. They strategically pulled out of the areas around Kiev and Kharkiv to strengthen the real objective: Donbass, Zaporozhye, and Kherson.

Ukraine never pushed them back, the only times Ukraine really pushes Russia back is after an influx of foreign "Ukrainian" fighters who are allowed to advance into a trap that results in their obliteration. Russia is fighting for the hearts and minds of the eastern Ukranians and is winning in terms of optics in those areas, regardless of what the propagandists are attempting to brainwash the rest of the world into believing.

Ukraine could surrender tomorrow and Russia would have achieved its objective. It is only being drug out by Ukraine and Nato and in doing so Russia will have an opportunity to take Odessa and push across the Dneipr River, not that they necessarily need nor want to, but it will be the result of Ukraine still not surrendering and Russia injecting about 300k more soldiers into the effort in the next month or so.

What do you mean? Russia has achieved its objective (land corridor to Crimea) and is just bleeding the Ukraine and Nato dry of soldiers and weapons (de-Nazification).

If Russia were to have taken all of Ukraine already it would have provoked retaliation from other countries, instead they acheived securing the most Russian areas with the most natural gas potential along with securing the strategic land corridor to Crimea (what they were really after strategic-wise, protecting the Russians in Ukraine is just a good cover).

Their effort was not bigger and more destructive in order to reduce civilian casualties due to them, and I would say they have succeeded and did exactly what they need to do: they showed they could get right up on Kiev and take it if they want. They strategically pulled out of the areas around Kiev and Kharkiv to strengthen the real objective: Donbass, Zaporozhye, and Kherson. Ukraine never pushed them back, the only times Ukraine really pushes Russia back is after an influx of foreign "Ukrainian" fighters who are allowed to advance into a trap that results in their obliteration. Russia is fighting for the hearts and minds of the eastern Ukranians and is winning in terms of optics in those areas, regardless of what the propagandists are attempting to brainwash the rest of the world into believing.

Ukraine could surrender tomorrow and Russia would have achieved its objective. It is only being drug out by Ukraine and Nato and in doing so Russia will have an opportunity to take Odessa and push across the Dneipr River, not that they necessarily need nor want to, but it will be the result of Ukraine still not surrendering and Russia injecting about 300k more soldiers into the effort in the next month or so.

What do you mean? Russia has achieved its objective (land corridor to Crimea) and is just bleeding the Ukraine and Nato dry of soldiers and weapons (de-Nazification).

If Russia were to have taken all of Ukraine already it would have provoked retaliation from other countries, instead they acheived securing the most Russian areas with the most natural gas potential along with securing the strategic land corridor to Crimea (what they were really after strategic-wise, protecting the Russians in Ukraine is just a good cover).

Their effort was not bigger and more destructive in order to reduce civilian casualties due to them, and I would say they have succeeded and did exactly what they need to do: they showed they could get right up on Kiev and take it if they want, but then they strategically pulled out to strengthen the real objective. Ukraine never pushed them back, the only times Ukraine really pushes Russia back is after an influx of foreign "Ukrainian" fighters who are allowed to advance into a trap that results in their obliteration.

Ukraine could surrender tomorrow and Russia would have achieved its objective. It is only being drug out by Ukraine and Nato and in doing so Russia will have an opportunity to take Odessa and push across the Dneipr River, not that they necessarily need nor want to, but it will be the result of Ukraine still not surrendering and Russia injecting about 300k more soldiers into the effort in the next month or so.

What do you mean? Russia has achieved its objective (land corridor to Crimea) and is just bleeding the Ukraine and Nato dry of soldiers and weapons (de-Nazification).

If Russia were to have taken all of Ukraine already it would have provoked retaliation from other countries, instead they acheived securing the most Russian areas with the most natural gas potential along with securing the strategic land corridor to Crimea (what they were really after strategic-wise, protecting the Russians in Ukraine is just a good cover).

Ukraine could surrender tomorrow and Russia would have achieved its objective. It is only being drug out by Ukraine and Nato and in doing so Russia will have an opportunity to take Odessa and push across the Dneipr River, not that they necessarily need nor want to, but it will be the result of Ukraine still not surrendering and Russia injecting about 300k more soldiers into the effort in the next month or so.