Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

You are likely correct. They may have come after them, but no reason to make it easy for them. Better to challenge jurisdiction, imo. When dealing with an unconstitutional Nazi organization, you can't really stop them from doing whatever they decide to do, but by voluntarily going into their jurisdiction, it is considered "consent to be prosecuted for any 'crimes' committed in that jurisdiction", imo, even if the 'crimes' are fabricated.


Best to never sign anything or ever give any verbal consent to anything when dealing with Feds since in most cases your signature or verbal consent are the only thing that gives them any jurisdiction, ever. This applies especially to those being held in jail, but uncharged.


Per due process violation of 5th Amendment, they should all be countersuing DOJ lawyers and Merrick Garland individually in Federal District Court civilly for "color of law violation" 42 USC 1983 and then immediately after file criminal charges for violations of 18 USC 241/242 AND 18 USC 2384 (prison time for each count). Then follow that up with Crimes Against Humanity violation charges and demand execution of all Defendants (DOJ lawyers and AG). Time to stop fucking around and time to start "legally" executing people, imo.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

You are likely correct. They may have come after them, but no reason to make it easy for them. Better to challenge jurisdiction, imo. When dealing with an unconstitutional Nazi organization, you can't really stop them from doing whatever they decide to do, but by voluntarily going into their jurisdiction, it is considered "consent to be prosecuted for any 'crimes' committed in that jurisdiction", imo, even if the 'crimes' are fabricated.


Best to never sign anything or ever give any verbal consent to anything when dealing with Feds since in most cases your signature or verbal consent are the only thing that gives them any jurisdiction, ever. This applies especially to those being held in jail, but uncharged.


Per due process violation of 5th Amendment, they should all be countersuing DOJ lawyers and Merrick Garland individually in Federal District Court civilly for "color of law violation" 42 USC 1983 and then immediately after file criminal charges for violations of 18 USC 241/242 AND 18 USC 2384 (prison time for each count). Then follow that up with Crimes Against Humanity violation charges and demand execution of all Defendants (DOJ lawyers and AG).

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

You are likely correct. They may have come after them, but no reason to make it easy for them. Better to challenge jurisdiction, imo. When dealing with an unconstitutional Nazi organization, you can't really stop them from doing whatever they decide to do, but by voluntarily going into their jurisdiction, it is considered "consent to be prosecuted for any 'crimes' committed in that jurisdiction", imo, even if the 'crimes' are fabricated.


Best to never sign anything or ever give any verbal consent to anything when dealing with Feds since in most cases your signature or verbal consent are the only thing that gives them any jurisdiction, ever. This applies especially to those being held in jail, but uncharged.


Per due process violation of 5th Amendment, they should all be countersuing DOJ lawyers and Merrick Garland individually in Federal District Court civilly for "color of law violation" and then immediately after file criminal charges for violations of 18 USC 241/242 AND 18 USC 2384. Then follow that up with Crimes Against Humanity violation charges and demand execution of all Defendants (DOJ lawyers and AG).

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

You are likely correct. They may have come after them, but no reason to make it easy for them. Better to challenge jurisdiction, imo. When dealing with an unconstitutional Nazi organization, you can't really stop them from doing whatever they decide to do, but by voluntarily going into their jurisdiction, it is considered "consent to be prosecuted for any 'crimes' committed in that jurisdiction", imo, even if the 'crimes' are fabricated.


Best to never sign anything or ever give any verbal consent to anything when dealing with Feds since in most cases your signature or verbal consent are the only thing that gives them any jurisdiction, ever. This applies especially to those being held in jail, but uncharged.


Per due process violation of 5th Amendment, they should all be countersuing DOJ lawyers and Merrick Garland individually in Federal District Court civilly for "color of law violation" and then immediately after file criminal charges for violations of 18 USC 241/242 AND 18 USC 2384. Then follow that up with Crimes Against Humanity and demand execution of the defendants.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

You are likely correct. They may have come after them, but no reason to make it easy for them. Better to challenge jurisdiction, imo. When dealing with an unconstitutional Nazi organization, you can't really stop them from doing whatever they decide to do, but by voluntarily going into their jurisdiction, it is considered "consent to be prosecuted for any 'crimes' committed in that jurisdiction", imo, even if the 'crimes' are fabricated.


Best to never sign anything or ever give any verbal consent to anything when dealing with Feds since in most cases your signature or verbal consent are the only thing that gives them any jurisdiction, ever.

1 year ago
1 score