Care to explain to the class where it talks about right to peace in the constitution?

There is already precedent from Cohen v California which was a landmark case holding that the first amendment prevented the conviction of Robert Cohen for the crime of disturbing the peace by wearing a jacket displaying “Fuck the Draft”.

The law must be narrowly tailored to achieve an important government interest that is unrelated to the suppression of speech.

You’re saying if someone hurts my feelings and it disturbs my peace, I should be able to call the police and have that person fined?

Care to explain to the class where it talks about right to peace in the constitution?

There is already precedent from Cohen v California which was a landmark case holding that the first amendment prevented the conviction of Robert Cohen for the crime of disturbing the peace by wearing a jacket displaying “Fuck the draft”.

The law must be narrowly tailored to achieve an important government interest that is unrelated to the suppression of speech.

You’re saying if someone hurts my feelings and it disturbs my peace, I should be able to call the police and have that person fined?

Care to explain to the class where it talks about right to peace in the constitution?

Care to explain to the class that freedom of speech, freedom of assembly can be squashed

There is already precedent from Cohen v California which was a landmark case holding that the first amendment prevented the conviction of Robert Cohen for the crime of disturbing the peace by wearing a jacket displaying “Fuck the draft”.

The law must be narrowly tailored to achieve an important government interest that is unrelated to the suppression of speech.

You’re saying if someone hurts my feelings and it disturbs my peace, I should be able to call the police and have that person fined?