1. You could first hear my arguments before down-voting me, but that's your personal style.

2. From the url nothing shows that this e-mail is really from a wikileaks Podest file.

3. Wikileaks does not comment their leaks on the leaked pages. See page 1 just the first segment on top, different colour and differen size of the typed text.

4. If this e-mail is really from wikileaks and from the Podesta e-mails it shows nothing, but SOMEBODY (whoever [email protected] is) wrote Podest an e-mail. That is all and proves nothing that his informations to Podesta have any value. Perhaps it was an maniac who wrote to Podesta.

5. The text is a very wild mixture of English sentences with German words inbetween. Who writes like that, never seen such bs before.

6. See bottom of page 2 and then top of page 3: The last sentence of page 2 and the first sentence of page 3 is cut of.

7. Overall it looks like somebody has taken his own text and overlayed a really existing wikileaks page.

8. Now you can down-vote my comment, if these arguments are not valid for you.

Edit: And last: Who writes e-mails without saying "Hello John, ..." or any final greetings and a name?

God bless you, fren.

1. You could first hear my arguments before down-voting me, but that's your personal style.

2. From the url nothing shows that this e-mail is really from a wikileaks Podest file.

3. Wikileaks does not comment their leaks on the leaked pages. See page 1 just the first segment on top, different colour and differen size of the typed text.

4. If this e-mail is really from wikileaks and from the Podesta e-mails it shows nothing, but SOMEBODY (whoever [email protected] is) wrote Podest an e-mail. That is all and proves nothing that his informations to Podesta have any value. Perhaps it was an maniac who wrote to Podesta.

5. The text is a very wild mixture of English sentences with German words inbetween. Who writes like that, never seen such bs before.

6. See bottom of page 2 and then top of page 3: The last sentence of page 2 and the first sentence of page 3 is cut of.

7. Overall it looks like somebody has taken his own text and overlayed a really existing wikileaks page.

8. Now you can down-vote my comment, if these arguments are not valid for you.

Edit: And last**: Who writes e-mails without saying "Hello John, ..." or any final greetings and a name?

God bless you, fren.

1. You could first hear my arguments before down-voting me, but that's your personal style.

2. From the url nothing shows that this e-mail is really from a wikileaks Podest file.

3. Wikileaks does not comment their leaks on the leaked pages. See page 1 just the first segment on top, different colour and differen size of the typed text.

4. If this e-mail is really from wikileaks and from the Podesta e-mails it shows nothing, but SOMEBODY (whoever [email protected] is) wrote Podest an e-mail. That is all and proves nothing that his informations to Podesta have any value. Perhaps it was an maniac who wrote to Podesta.

5. The text is a very wild mixture of English sentences with German words inbetween. Who writes like that, never seen such bs before.

6. See bottom of page 2 and then top of page 3: The last sentence of page 2 and the first sentence of page 3 is cut of.

7. Overall it looks like somebody has taken his own text and overlayed a really existing wikileaks page.

8. Now you can down-vote my comment, if these arguments are not valid for you.

God bless you, fren.