Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Tonight's Part 2 on Tucker was disappointing.

I had hoped he would show the magnetic doors video, where the officer motions to release the lock. The absolute only reason to open those doors would be to allow the protesters to enter. To me, this is the most powerful video Tucker could have shown.

And how about the video of the patriotic protesters trying to pull antifa away from the windows and pull them off of officers?

I like the one, too, where the woman complains that the guy wearing the earpiece pushed her in.

And of great importance are the bills democrats in Congress tried to pass that would prevent the Constitutional procedure (of allowing states to be contested and debated) from ever happening again. It is obvious they had the motive to disrupt the proceding right after AZ was contested, even though the protesters were still at the Rally. They are obviously the ones who opposed this Constitutional option.

This one in July failed:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/4573

So, they snuck it in the omnibus bill:

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/congress-approves-new-election-certification-rules-in-response-to-jan-6

I had also hoped Tucker would address the obvious point that there were two groups of people there:

  1. The protesters were there to show their numbers in support of the Senators' decisions to contest the stolen states.
  2. The second group was there to disrupt the procedure.

The two groups had opposite motives. The question is, which group got what they wanted because of the riot? Not the Trump supporters...It was those violent rioters who looked and acted nothing like us.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Tonight's Part 2 on Tucker was disappointing.

I hoped he would show the magnetic doors video, where the officer motions to release the lock.

And how about the video of the patriotic protesters trying to pull antifa away from the windows and pull them off of officers?

I like the one, too, where the woman complains that the guy wearing the earpiece pushed her in.

And of great importance are the bills democrats in Congress tried to pass that would prevent the Constitutional procedure (of allowing states to be contested and debated) from ever happening again. It is obvious they had the motive to disrupt the proceding right after AZ was contested, even though the protesters were still at the Rally. They are obviously the ones who opposed this Constitutional option.

This one in July failed:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/4573

So, they snuck it in the omnibus bill:

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/congress-approves-new-election-certification-rules-in-response-to-jan-6

I had also hoped Tucker would address the obvious point that there were two groups of people there:

  1. The protesters were there to show their numbers in support of the Senators' decisions to contest the stolen states.
  2. The second group was there to disrupt the procedure.

The two groups had opposite motives. The question is, which group got what they wanted because of the riot? Not the Trump supporters...It was those violent rioters who looked and acted nothing like us.

1 year ago
1 score