No I did not see that, I've been obsessed for over a month straight. Can you link me? That sounds really cool.
Isn't it funny how if you're primary goal is to heat a location, you could use a wood stove which is condsidered to be up to 80% efficient with modern ones or you could use resistive heaters like baseboard units, which are also considered to be ~100% efficient or you could use a heat pump and freeze one location while simultaneously heating another location and relocate >1.8 times the amount of energy it took to spin the pump.
Somehow people think that isn't free energy... even if the primary goal and intention was to heat a specific thing, a heat pump could be used to give energy to endorthermic chemical reactions.
People say, well the heat wasn't created, the energy came from somewhere else, but so did the energy in the wire for the electric heater, that's kind of a cop-out argument.
I think that free energy is a proven reality and has been since the first heat pump with a coefficient of perfomance over 1.0 has been made.
What's your thoughts on my way of looking at that?
No I did not see that, I've been obsessed for over a month straight. Can you link me? That sounds really cool.
Isn't it funny how if you're primary goal is to heat a location, you could use a wood stove which is condsidered to be up to 80% efficient with modern ones or you could use resistive heaters like baseboard units, which are also considered to be ~100% efficient or you could use a heat pump and freeze one location while simultaneously heating another location at and relocated >1.8 times the amount of energy it took to spin the pump.
Somehow people think that isn't free energy... even if the primary goal and intention was to heat a specific thing, a heat pump could be used to give energy to endorthermic chemical reactions.
People say, well the heat wasn't created, the energy came from somewhere else, but so did the energy in the wire for the electric heater, that's kind of a cop-out argument.
I think that free energy is a proven reality and has been since the first heat pump with a coefficient of perfomance over 1.0 has been made.
What's your thoughts on my way of looking at that?
No I did not see that, I've been obsessed for over a month straight. Can you link me? That sounds really cool.
Isn't it funny how if you're primary goal is to heat a location, you could use a wood stove which is condsidered to be up to 80% efficient with modern ones or you could use resistive heaters like baseboard units, which are also considered to be ~100% efficient or you could use a heat pump and freeze one location while simulataneously heating another location at and relocated >1.8 times the amount of energy it took to spin the pump.
Somehow people think that isn't free energy... even if the primary goal and intention was to heat a specific thing, a heat pump could be used to give energy to endorthermic chemical reactions.
People say, well the heat wasn't created, the energy came from somewhere else, but so did the energy in the wire for the electric heater, that's kind of a cop-out argument.
I think that free energy is a proven reality and has been since the first heat pump with a coefficient of perfomance over 1.0 has been made.
What's your thoughts on my way of looking at that?
No I did not see that, I've been obsessed for over a month straight. Can you link me? That sounds really cool.