Isn't that already a law, the 1st something or other?

edit: I was wrong. The way deep state twists meaning & semantics allows them to feel like they should be able to do this when it is clearly against the spirit of the law.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. "

https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/#:~:text=Congress%20shall%20make%20no%20law,for%20a%20redress%20of%20grievances.

edit 2:

A deeper dive into the 1st Amendment- https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/amendment-1/

Isn't that already a law, the 1st something or other?

edit: I was wrong. The way deep state twists meaning & semantics allows them to feel like they should be able to do this when it is clearly against the spirit of the law.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. "

https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/#:~:text=Congress%20shall%20make%20no%20law,for%20a%20redress%20of%20grievances.

Isn't that already a law, the 1st something or other?