(1) Make sure you understand the concept of "dual-purpose funding." This means that Fauci can OFFICIALLY fund something (say, learning if hampsters like cheese), and once that money is gifted to the lab/university/foreign country, the money can be used for ANYTHING ELSE instead (say, learning if humans will follow mask orders). Dual-purpose funding means that ANY offical use of government grants can be used for ANYTHING other than what it was officially used for. Therefore, "gain of function reaseach" might be for anything -- literally, anything.

(2) Nobody has EVER demonstrated that a "virus" can be transmitted from a sick person (who it is claimed "has the virus") to another person, and make them sick. This was attempted with Spanish Flu, measles, and other so-called viruses. There was even a 10-year study of married couples, where one partner was supposedly HIV+ and the other HIV-, and over 10 years, with many thousands of sexual acts, NOT ONE person who was HIV- ever became HIV+. Even if a "virus" did exist as a real thing, there is NO EVIDENCE that it is transmissible. This goes for ALL "viruses."

(3) Nobody has EVER been able to isolate and purify a "virus," meaning no person has ever taken a bodily fluid from any human or animal, and extracted a PURE virus from it, with nothing else at all in the sample. More than 100 government agencies and university labs all over the world have confirmed in writing that (a) they do not have such a sample of a "virus," (b) they do not know where any other lab in the world has such a sample, and (c) they do not know of any paper published anywhere that demonstrates that this has EVER been done.

Therefore, what IS "gain of function" research?

Clearly, it means to gain some sort of function. Seems to me to be some sort of bioweapons research. This could be in the form of creating sprays to be sprayed on specific populations, or it could be the creation of drugs that would be directly injected into targeted individuals. Or, it could be something else.

What we can say with confidence is this: It is NOT about an actual virus, because a virus is nothing more than dead cellular debris that shows up in the photographs of an electron microscope as a result of the process used that claims to study a virus. It is not something that could ever be used as a bioweapon to spread "naturally" from one person breathing it out to another person breathing it in.

There is also another possibility, which is that "gain of function research" could be nothing more than a money laundering scheme. These people -- ESPECIALLY Tony Fauci -- are so STUPID that they MIGHT believe that even though they have never been able to prove anything regarding viruses, they believe they can, and so they spend billions to try, and in the process it is "ok" for them if they get rich while trying.

One question that has never been asked, but should be, is this: What "gain of function" result has ever been accomplished from all that money being spent? Even if not from a "virus," what has been any result of any gain of function from all of this money that has been spent on this research?

I have come across several people in my research that universally say Tony Fauci is a true idiot.

Regardless, Fauci is a fraud, and con man, and a criminal who should be prosecuted for his crimes. Either he is too stupid to know what he has been funding, or too evil.

(1) Make sure you understand the concept of "dual-purpose funding." This means that Fauci can OFFICIALLY fund something (say, learning if hampsters like cheese), and once that money is gifted to the lab/university/foreign country, the money can be used for ANYTHING ELSE instead (say, learning if humans will follow mask orders). Dual-purpose funding means that ANY offical use of government grants can be used for ANYTHING other than what it was officially used for. Therefore, "gain of function reaseach" might be for anything -- literally, anything.

(2) Nobody has EVER demonstrated that a "virus" can be transmitted from a sick person (who it is claimed "has the virus") to another person, and make them sick. This was attempted with Spanish Flu, measles, and other so-called viruses. There was even a 10-year study of married couples, where one partner was supposedly HIV+ and the other HIV-, and over 10 years, with many thousands of sexual acts, NOT ONE person who was HIV- ever became HIV+. Even if a "virus" did exist as a real thing, there is NO EVIDENCE that it is transmissible. This goes for ALL "viruses."

(3) Nobody has EVER been able to isolate and purify a "virus," meaning no person has ever taken a bodily fluid from any human or animal, and extracted a PURE virus from it, with nothing else at all in the sample. More than 100 government agencies and university labs all over the world have confirmed in writing that (a) they do not have such a sample of a "virus," (b) they do not know where any other lab in the world has such a sample, and (c) they do not know of any paper published anywhere that demonstrates that this has EVER been done.

Therefore, what IS "gain of function" research?

Clearly, it means to gain some sort of function. Seems to me to be some sort of bioweapons research. This could be in the form of creating sprays to be sprayed on specific populations, or it could be the creation of drugs that would be directly injected into targeted individuals. Or, it could be something else.

What we can say with confidence is this: It is NOT about an actual virus, because a virus is nothing more than dead cellular debris that shows up in the photographs of an electron microscope as a result of the process used that claims to study a virus. It is not something that could ever be used as a bioweapon to spread "naturally" from one person breathing it out to another person breathing it in.

There is also another possibility, which is that "gain of function research" could be nothing more than a money laundering scheme. These people -- ESPECIALLY Tony Fauci -- are so STUPID that they MIGHT believe that even though they have never been able to prove anything regarding viruses, they believe they can, and so they spend billions to try, and in the process it is "ok" for them if they get rich while trying.

I have come across several people in my research that universally say Tony Fauci is a true idiot.

Either way, he is a fraud, and con man, and a criminal who should be prosecuted for his crimes.

(1) Make sure you understand the concept of "dual-purpose funding." This means that Fauci can OFFICIALLY fund something (say, learning if hampsters like cheese), and once that money is gifted to the lab/university/foreign country, the money can be used for ANYTHING ELSE instead (say, learning if humans will follow mask orders). Dual-purpose funding means that ANY offical use of government grants can be used for ANYTHING other than what it was officially used for. Therefore, "gain of function reaseach" might be for anything -- literally, anything.

(2) Nobody has EVER demonstrated that a "virus" can be transmitted from a sick person (who it is claimed "has the virus") to another person, and make them sick. This was attempted with Spanish Flu, measles, and other so-called viruses. There was even a 10-year study of married couples, where one partner was supposedly HIV+ and the other HIV-, and over 10 years, with many thousands of sexual acts, NOT ONE person who was HIV- ever became HIV+. Even if a "virus" did exist as a real thing, there is NO EVIDENCE that it is transmissible. This goes for ALL "viruses."

(3) Nobody has EVER been able to isolate and purify a "virus," meaning no person has ever taken a bodily fluid from any human or animal, and extracted a PURE virus from it, with nothing else at all in the sample. More than 100 government agencies and university labs all over the world have confirmed in writing that (a) they do not have such a sample of a "virus," (b) they do not know where any other lab in the world has such a sample, and (c) they do not know of any paper published anywhere that demonstrates that this has EVER been done.

Therefore, what IS "gain of function" research?

Clearly, it means to gain some sort of function. Seems to me to be some sort of bioweapons research. This could be in the form of creating sprays to be sprayed on specific populations, or it could be the creation of drugs that would be directly injected into targeted individuals. Or, it could be something else.

What we can say with confidence is this: It is NOT about an actual virus, because a virus is nothing more than dead cellular debris that shows up in the photographs of an electron microscope as a result of the process used that claims to study a virus. It is not something that could ever be used as a bioweapon to spread "naturally" from one person breathing it out to another person breathing it in.

This is also another possibility, which is that "gain of function research" could be nothing more than a money laundering scheme. These people -- ESPECIALLY Tony Fauci -- are so STUPID that they MIGHT believe that even though they have never been able to prove anything regarding viruses, they believe they can, and so they spend billions to try, and in the process it is "ok" for them if they get rich while trying.

I have come across several people in my research that universally say Tony Fauci is a true idiot.

Either way, he is a fraud, and con man, and a criminal who should be prosecuted for his crimes.

(1) Make sure you understand the concept of "dual-purpose funding." This means that Fauci can OFFICIALLY fund something (say, learning if hampsters like cheese), and once that money is gifted to the lab/university/foreign country, the money can be used for ANYTHING ELSE instead (say, learning if humans will follow mask orders). Dual-purpose funding means that ANY offical use of government grants can be used for ANYTHING other than what it was officially used for. Therefore, "gain of function reaseach" might be for anything -- litereally, anything.

(2) Nobody has EVER demonstrated that a "virus" can be transmitted from a sick person (who it is claimed "has the virus") to another person, and make them sick. This was attempted with Spanish Flu, measles, and other so-called viruses. There was even a 10-year study of married couples, where one partner was supposedly HIV+ and the other HIV-, and over 10 years, with many thousands of sexual acts, NOT ONE person who was HIV- ever became HIV+. Even if a "virus" did exist as a real thing, there is NO EVIDENCE that it is transmissible. This goes for ALL "viruses."

(3) Nobody has EVER been able to isolate and purify a "virus," meaning no person has ever taken a bodily fluid from any human or animal, and extracted a PURE virus from it, with nothing else at all in the sample. More than 100 government agencies and university labs all over the world have confirmed in writing that (a) they do not have such a sample of a "virus," (b) they do not know where any other lab in the world has such a sample, and (c) they do not know of any paper published anywhere that demonstrates that this has EVER been done.

Therefore, what IS "gain of function" research?

Clearly, it means to gain some sort of function. Seems to me to be some sort of bioweapons research. This could be in the form of creating sprays to be sprayed on specific populations, or it could be the creation of drugs that would be directly injected into targeted individuals. Or, it could be something else.

What we can say with confidence is this: It is NOT about an actual virus, because a virus is nothing more than dead cellular debris that shows up in the photographs of an electron microscope as a result of the process used that claims to study a virus. It is not something that could ever be used as a bioweapon to spread "naturally" from one person breathing it out to another person breathing it in.

This is also another possibility, which is that "gain of function research" could be nothing more than a money laundering scheme. These people -- ESPECIALLY Tony Fauci -- are so STUPID that they MIGHT believe that even though they have never been able to prove anything regarding viruses, they believe they can, and so they spend billions to try, and in the process it is "ok" for them if they get rich while trying.

I have come across several people in my research that universally say Tony Fauci is a true idiot.

Either way, he is a fraud, and con man, and a criminal who should be prosecuted for his crimes.