Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I think that it is useful to separate people who harm children from people who do not. If being overly broad is your thing, you could just call everyone sinners, then you would be in the same category as the pedos. Once someone's sexual nature has been imprinted, there is no changing it. It was not innate from birth, but for all intents and purposes, it is innate as an adult. If you want to reduce harm to children, we need to focus our efforts on exactly the people who are harming them. Burning bridges like you seem to want to do is not going to help the most children.

In the last sentence of your first paragraph, you say that it is not innate, however, your last paragraph seems to be supporting a conclusion around innateness. Do you care to elaborate or make up your mind?

340 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I think that it is useful to separate people who harm children from people who do not. If being overly broad is your thing, you could just call everyone sinners, then you would be in the same category as the pedos. Once someone's sexual nature has been imprinted, there is no changing it. It was not innate from birth, but for all intents and purposes, it is innate as an adult. If you want to reduce harm to children, we need to focus our efforts on exactly the people who are harming them. Burning bridges like you seem to want to do is not going to help the most children.

340 days ago
1 score