Like I posted above, it's a common tactic for websites such as that to regurgitate old posts to get clicks and ad revenue.

Money. That's why.

The post itself was written a year ago.

All they have to do is "update" it. Which could just mean re-opening the file it's saved under. And then it gets bumped up in newsfeeds and people click on it, thinking it is new and they earn money from that.

It's not uncommon.

When there's an actual update to news articles, the news source will usually make an edit at the bottom telling you what has been changed or added.

The lack of such a thing is why I believe it's just been regurgitated for clicks.

Like I posted above, it's a common tactic for websites such as that to regurgitate old posts to get clicks and ad revenue.

Money. That's why.

The post itself was written a year ago.

All they have to do is "update" it. Which could just mean re-opening the file it's saved under. And then it gets bumped up in newsfeeds and people click on it, thinking it is new and they earn money from that.

It's not uncommon.