The "milk was loaded with" does this mean they poisoned the cow? OR did they just poison the milk? It makes a difference.
First of all, anything with the words 'communist' China makes me think that the article has a bias. China has just brokered a peace deal in the Middle East - something Americans have actively tried to resist. So, their 'communism' looks like tolerance for other types of culture.
China also did not use Pfizer or Moderna as their go-to vax - instead they locked down and spent the time developing their own vax, and only recommend that 'at risk' people take it. Anyone healthy had to just get the bug which had mutated to Omicron, by then - so a common cold.
Second, SLAY news? Never heard of it.
Third, the paper, if anyone bothered to read it, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.19.517879v1.full.pdf talks about
-
'making the vaccine in milk" to derive bovine milk-derived exosomes - i.e. the vaccine is grown in milk. Then it is isolated. The milk is used as a culture. This does not mean that ALL milk will be poisoned. Eggs have been used in the past, or peanut paste, and even wheat, to make vaccines.
-
The mice were vaccinated using an oral vaccine - NOT milk. Many scientists have argued that is a better vector for immunizing against respiratory diseases, as opposed to INJECTING the damn stuff. So, I don't see a problem with the methodology.
Of course I don't agree with FORCED vaccination, but that is a different argument, and not what this paper is about.
The scare tactics could be yet another political attempt to get some sort of food-labelling legislation through, like they are doing in NZ, whereby 'therapeutics' such as avocado oil, cinnamon, or anything really, that is sold in the health food shop, have to a registration label the producers have to pay for.
Let's not all panic, please. By all means be enraged by politicians who try to force-vaccinate. But I don't think they are poisoning the food supply.
The "milk was loaded with" does this mean they poisoned the cow? OR did they just poison the milk? It makes a difference.
First of all, anything with the words 'communist' China makes me think that the article has a bias. China has just brokered a peace deal in the Middle East - something Americans have actively tried to resist. So, their 'communism' looks like tolerance for other types of culture.
China also did not use Pfizer or Moderna as their go-to vax - instead they locked down and spent the time developing their own vax, and only recommend that 'at risk' people take it. Anyone healthy had to just get the bug which had mutated to Omicron, by then - so a common cold.
Second, SLAY news? Never heard of it.
Third, the paper, if anyone bothered to read it, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.19.517879v1.full.pdf talks about 1) 'making the vaccine in milk" to derive bovine milk-derived exosomes - i.e. the vaccine is grown in milk. Then it is isolated. The milk is used as a culture. This does not mean that ALL milk will be poisoned. Eggs have been used in the past, or peanut paste, and even wheat, to make vaccines.
- The mice were vaccinated using an oral vaccine - NOT milk. Many scientists have argued that is a better vector for immunizing against respiratory diseases, as opposed to INJECTING the damn stuff. So, I don't see a problem with the methodology.
Of course I don't agree with FORCED vaccination, but that is a different argument, and not what this paper is about.
The scare tactics could be yet another political attempt to get some sort of food-labelling legislation through, like they are doing in NZ, whereby 'therapeutics' such as avocado oil, cinnamon, or anything really, that is sold in the health food shop, have to a registration label the producers have to pay for.
Let's not all panic, please. By all means be enraged by politicians who try to force-vaccinate. But I don't think they are poisoning the food supply.