There is zero chance that planes alone, along with the resulting fires, could have brought down the Twin Towers.
I do think planes were used, but they are not what brought down the towers.
The idea that steel has a melting point or that it weakens is irrelevant. Yes, if you have a 10-foot section of steel, and you burn it in a fire, it will eventually get weak and eventually it will melt.
But that has nothing whatsoever to do with the Twin Towers.
The reason that skyscrapers are made of steel is primarily due to prevention of catastrophic failure in the event of fire. Steel is the best conductor of heat of all available materials. If one section catches fire, the heat of the steel in that area will be transferred throughout the structure, making any particular square foot of steel not very hot at all.
Certainly, office fires -- even with jet fuel igniting them -- could never have heated the steel up enough to weaken, much less melt.
The heat would have been transferred thoughout the massive 100+ story structure. And the fact that there were 47 core columns of steel in the middle PLUS numerous steel columns all around the towers means that there is absolutely no chance of catastrophic failure due to fire.
This is why no steel structure has ever collapsed due to fire -- before or since.
The buildings were wired for demolition. There were many stories coming out in the months after 9/11 where people were talking about how certain offices were shut down for "electrical upgrades" and employees were not allowed in for several days. This was a few weeks before the event.
The planes flew into precise locations (using homing devices) where explosives were placed, creating the big explosions. Meanwhile, the steel columns were cut via thermite, which is what was seen in the "melted steel." Yes, melted in isolated areas, as the thermite cut right through it and melted in those specific areas.
There was no "pancake collapse," as that is an impossibility, created by the perps to push into the media.
The planes were the distraction, they hit where there were explosives which gave plausibility to the cover story, and the steel columns were cut to bring down the buildings.
Controlled demolition -- the most sophisticated in history -- along with a bullshit cover story to deceive the masses.
It set the stage for the tyrannical Patriot Act and the fake War on Terrorism, to take over Iraq oil.
Bunch of scumbags did this, and they were not operating from any cave in Afghanistan.
Here is an interesting clip from a BBC documentary, "Al Qaeda Does Not Exist." The video has been scrubbed, but this clip pops up from time to time. It explains what Al Qaeda really was:
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xbzedd
A video called "Hunt the Boeing" was my personal wake-up call that the entire thing was faked:
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2nk2my
P.S. The architect who designed the Twin Towers was on video being interviewed prior to the event about the nature of the design of the towers. I think that video has disappeared. But I remember specifically that he said he designed it the way he did BECAUSE he wanted to make sure they would never fall in case of being hit by MULTIPLE jet airplanes. The Empire State Building had been struck by a plane in foggy conditions years before, and he took that into consideration. He said the "net/girder" system design would be like poking a pencil through a mosquito net, and that even multiple Boeing 707's (large jets at the time -- similar in size the the 757 and 767 that "hit" -- if they did) would have had NO EFFECT on the ability of those buildings to withstand the hits.
There is zero chance that planes alone, along with the resulting fires, could have brought down the Twin Towers.
I do think planes were used, but they are not what brought down the towers.
The idea that steel has a melting point or that it weakens is irrelevant. Yes, if you have a 10-foot section of steel, and you burn it in a fire, it will eventually get weak and eventually it will melt.
But that has nothing whatsoever to do with the Twin Towers.
The reason that skyscrapers are made of steel is primarily due to prevention of catastrophic failure in the event of fire. Steel is the best conductor of heat of all available materials. If one section catches fire, the heat of the steel in that area will be transferred throughout the structure, making any particular square foot of steel not very hot at all.
Certainly, office fires -- even with jet fuel igniting them -- could never have heated the steel up enough to weaken, much less melt.
The heat would have been transferred thoughout the massive 100+ story structure. And the fact that there were 47 core columns of steel in the middle PLUS numerous steel columns all around the towers means that there is absolutely no chance of catastrophic failure due to fire.
This is why no steel structure has ever collapsed due to fire -- before or since.
The buildings were wired for demolition. There were many stories coming out in the months after 9/11 where people were talking about how certain offices were shut down for "electrical upgrades" and employees were not allowed in for several days. This was a few weeks before the event.
The planes flew into precise locations (using homing devices) where explosives were placed, creating the big explosions. Meanwhile, the steel columns were cut via thermite, which is what was seen in the "melted steel." Yes, melted in isolated areas, as the thermite cut right through it and melted in those specific areas.
There was no "pancake collapse," as that is an impossibility, created by the perps to push into the media.
The planes were the distraction, they hit where there were explosives which gave plausibility to the cover story, and the steel columns were cut to bring down the buildings.
Controlled demolition -- the most sophisticated in history -- along with a bullshit cover story to deceive the masses.
It set the stage for the tyrannical Patriot Act and the fake War on Terrorism, to take over Iraq oil.
Bunch of scumbags did this, and they were not operating from any cave in Afghanistan.
Here is an interesting clip from a BBC documentary, "Al Qaeda Does Not Exist." The video has been scrubbed, but this clip pops up from time to time. It explains what Al Qaeda really was:
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xbzedd
A video called "Hunt the Boeing" was my personal wake-up call that the entire thing was faked:
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2nk2my
P.S. The architect who designed the Twin Towers was on video being interviewed prior to the event about the nature of the design of the towers. I think that video has disappeared. But I remember specifically that he said he designed it the way he did BECAUSE he wanted to make sure they would never fall in case of being hit by MULTIPLE jet airplanes. The Empire State Building had been struck by a plane in foggy conditions years before, and he took that into consideration. He said the "net/girder" system design would be like poking a pencil through a mosquito net, and that even multiple Boeing 707's (large jets at the time -- similar in size the the 757 and 767 that "hit" -- if they did) would have had NO EFFECT on the ability of that buildings to withstand the hits.
There is zero chance that planes alone, along with the resulting fires, could have brought down the Twin Towers.
I do think planes were used, but they are not what brought down the towers.
The idea that steel has a melting point or that it weakens is irrelevant. Yes, if you have a 10-foot section of steel, and you burn it in a fire, it will eventually get weak and eventually it will melt.
But that has nothing whatsoever to do with the Twin Towers.
The reason that skyscrapers are made of steel is primarily due to prevention of catastrophic failure in the event of fire. Steel is the best conductor of heat of all available materials. If one section catches fire, the heat of the steel in that area will be transferred throughout the structure, making any particular square foot of steel not very hot at all.
Certainly, office fires -- even with jet fuel igniting them -- could never have heated the steel up enough to weaken, much less melt.
The heat would have been transferred thoughout the massive 100+ story structure. And the fact that there were 47 core columns of steel in the middle PLUS numerous steel columns all around the towers means that there is absolutely no chance of catastrophic failure due to fire.
This is why no steel structure has ever collapsed due to fire -- before or since.
The buildings were wired for demolition. There were many stories coming out in the months after 9/11 where people were talking about how certain offices were shut down for "electrical upgrades" and employees were not allowed in for several days. This was a few weeks before the event.
The planes flew into precise locations (using homing devices) where explosives were placed, creating the big explosions. Meanwhile, the steel columns were cut via thermite, which is what was seen in the "melted steel." Yes, melted in isolated areas, as the thermite cut right through it and melted in those specific areas.
There was no "pancake collapse," as that is an impossibility, created by the perps to push into the media.
The planes were the distraction, they hit where there were explosives which gave plausibility to the cover story, and the steel columns were cut to bring down the buildings.
Controlled demolition -- the most sophisticated in history -- along with a bullshit cover story to deceive the masses.
It set the stage for the tyrannical Patriot Act and the fake War on Terrorism, to take over Iraq oil.
Bunch of scumbags did this, and they were not operating from any cave in Afghanistan.
Here is an interesting clip from a BBC documentary, "Al Qaeda Does Not Exist." The video has been scrubbed, but this clip pops up from time to time. It explains what Al Qaeda really was:
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xbzedd
A video called "Hunt the Boeing" was my personal wake-up call that the entire thing was faked:
There is zero chance that planes alone, along with the resulting fires, could have brought down the Twin Towers.
I do think planes were used, but they are not what brought down the towers.
The idea that steel has a melting point or that it weakens is irrelevant. Yes, if you have a 10-foot section of steel, and you burn it in a fire, it will eventually get weak and eventually it will melt.
But that has nothing whatsoever to do with the Twin Towers.
The reason that skyscrapers are made of steel is primarily due to prevention of catastrophic failure in the event of fire. Steel is the best conductor of heat of all available materials. If one section catches fire, the heat of the steel in that area will be transferred throughout the structure, making any particular square foot of steel not very hot at all.
Certainly, office fires -- even with jet fuel igniting them -- could never have heated the steel up enough to weaken, much less melt.
The heat would have been transferred thoughout the massive 100+ story structure. And the fact that there were 47 core columns of steel in the middle PLUS numerous steel columns all around the towers means that there is absolutely no chance of catastrophic failure due to fire.
This is why no steel structure has ever collapsed due to fire -- before or since.
The buildings were wired for demolition. There were many stories coming out in the months after 9/11 where people were talking about how certain offices were shut down for "electrical upgrades" and employees were not allowed in for several days. This was a few weeks before the event.
The planes flew into precise locations (using homing devices) where explosives were placed, creating the big explosions. Meanwhile, the steel columns were cut via thermite, which is what was seen in the "melted steel." Yes, melted in isolated areas, as the thermite cut right through it and melted in those specific areas.
There was no "pancake collapse," as that is an impossibility, created by the perps to push into the media.
The planes were the distraction, they hit were there were explosives which gave plausibility to the cover story, and the steel columns were cut to bring down the buildings.
Controlled demolition -- the most sophisticated in history -- along with a bullshit cover story to deceive the masses.
It set the stage for the tyrannical Patriot Act and the fake War on Terrorism, to take over Iraq oil.
Bunch of scumbags did this, and they were not operating from any cave in Afghanistan.
Here is an interesting clip from a BBC documentary, "Al Qaeda Does Not Exist." The video has been scrubbed, but this clip pops up from time to time. It explains what Al Qaeda really was:
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xbzedd
A video called "Hunt the Boeing" was my personal wake-up call that the entire thing was faked: