There is no chance that Hitler was on the side of the bankers.

If you learn about his early adulthood, his failure as an art student (because he actually created good art in an era that appreciated depravity), and then his time as a soldier in WWI (where he could not advance beyond corporal because his captain thought that Hitler "lacked leadership skills"), and then you understand what was happening in post-WW1 Germany and Hitler's attempt to counter the communists ... when you put all the pieces of the puzzle together, along with his outlawing usury and arresting Louis Rothschild, you cannot possibly come to the conclusion that he had any backing at all from the banksters.

He even created his own money.

Zero chance, and really it is just blasphemy.

There is no chance that Hitler was on the side of the bankers.

If you learn about his early adulthood, his failure as an art student (because he actually created good art in an era that appreciated depravity), and then his time as a soldier in WWI (where he could not advance beyond corporal because his captain thought that Hitler "lacked leadership skills"), and then you understand what was happening in post-WW2 Germany and Hitler's attempt to counter the communists ... when you put all the pieces of the puzzle together, along with his outlawing usury and arresting Louis Rothschild, you cannot possibly come to the conclusion that he had any backing at all from the banksters.

He even created his own money.

Zero chance, and really it is just blasphemy.