Its an interesting question. I'm just going to think out loud with a bunch of "maybe" and "what if" language because I don't know what I don't know.

Maybe "Climate Change" is a code word for a change in conditions that is unfavorable to them that will occur after the 16 years. The only thing they talk about as being of imminent unavoidable danger, the kind of doomsday clock that would require 16 year plans etc, is "Climate Change".

Whatever "Climate Change" means, its not about the weather, they keep parroting the same concept often with what sounds enough like genuine concern to me -- but because none of their power apparatus is making any real effort to fight the exact thing they have us believing "climate change" is, and we do know they they would have had all the power to actually resist the "climate change" they only pretend to resist -- I think it has a double meaning.

If they wanted to stop industrial pollution, this was always in their power to do. If they wanted to clean up the trash continent in the Pacific Ocean. this was always in their power to do. If they wanted to terraform land to maximize tree growth and stop the destruction of the rain forests this was all in their power to do. If they wanted to build towards renewable energy and in massive supply, nuclear power has existed for almost a century now and has been suppressed, the completion of that suppression appears to coincide with 2024 (that's interesting), with reactors being taken offline as we speak. If they wanted a stable population that had the ability to conserve resources they would not have done so much to over-produce low quality goods and degrade people's options to be self-sufficient. This was entirely in their power to influence the world into a positive direction, instead they accelerated towards the opposite direction.

It could just be greed -- but when you print paper money and have what is effectively a blank check, the logic fails that it would be simple greed, and rigging your paper money system (that gives you a substantial and nearly unlimited advantage in the world) to fail, when you have the ability to prevent it from failing, just doesn't make sense in the context of simple greed.

So what exactly is "Climate Change", really?

Its an interesting question. I'm just going to think out loud with a bunch of "maybe" and "what if" language because I don't know what I don't know.

Maybe "Climate Change" is a code word for a change in conditions that is unfavorable to them that will occur after the 16 years. The only thing they talk about as being of imminent unavoidable danger, the kind of doomsday clock that would require 16 year plans etc, is "Climate Change".

Whatever "Climate Change" means, its not about the weather, they keep parroting the same concept often with what sounds enough like genuine concern to me -- but because none of their power apparatus is making any real effort to fight the exact thing they have us believing "climate change" is, and we do know they they would have had all the power to actually resist the "climate change" they only pretend to resist -- I think it has a double meaning.

If they wanted to stop industrial pollution, this was always in their power to do. If they wanted to clean up the trash continent in the Pacific Ocean. this was always in their power to do. If they wanted to terraform land to maximize tree growth and stop the destruction of the rain forests this was all in their power to do. If they wanted to build towards renewable energy and in massive supply, nuclear power has existed for almost a century now and has been suppressed, the completion of that suppression has appears to coincide with the 2024 (that's interesting). If they wanted a stable population that had the ability to conserve resources they would not have done so much to over-produce low quality goods and degrade people's options to be self-sufficient. This was entirely in their power to influence the world into this direction.

It could just be greed -- but when you print paper money and have what is effectively a blank check, the logic fails that it would be simple greed, and rigging your paper money system (that gives you a substantial and nearly unlimited advantage in the world) to fail, when you have the ability to prevent it from failing, just doesn't make sense in the context of simple greed.

So what exactly is "Climate Change", really?

Its an interesting question. I'm just going to think out loud with a bunch of "maybe" and "what if" language because I don't know what I don't know.

Maybe "Climate Change" is a code word for a change in conditions that is unfavorable to them that will occur after the 16 years.

Whatever "Climate Change" means, its not about the weather, they keep parroting the same concept often with what sounds enough like genuine concern to me -- but because none of their power apparatus is making any real effort to fight the exact thing they have us believing "climate change" is, and we do know they they would have had all the power to actually resist the "climate change" they only pretend to resist -- I think it has a double meaning.

If they wanted to stop industrial pollution, this was always in their power to do. If they wanted to clean up the trash continent in the Pacific Ocean. this was always in their power to do. If they wanted to terraform land to maximize tree growth and stop the destruction of the rain forests this was all in their power to do. If they wanted to build towards renewable energy and in massive supply, nuclear power has existed for almost a century now and has been suppressed, the completion of that suppression has appears to coincide with the 2024 (that's interesting). If they wanted a stable population that had the ability to conserve resources they would not have done so much to over-produce low quality goods and degrade people's options to be self-sufficient. This was entirely in their power to influence the world into this direction.

It could just be greed -- but when you print paper money and have what is effectively a blank check, the logic fails that it would be simple greed, and rigging your paper money system (that gives you a substantial and nearly unlimited advantage in the world) to fail, when you have the ability to prevent it from failing, just doesn't make sense in the context of simple greed.