Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

AIDS is an umbrella term that covers 30 different dis-eases today. In the early 90s it was perhaps 7-10. They added new dis-eases for about two decades to get to the current 30.

Did you know all 30 dis-eases alleged to be a "sign of AIDS" are and have been well described and catalogued in the medical literature for many decades before so-called AIDS came along? How can this be reconciled?

Did you know the one and only time the establishment tested established AIDS patients for the presence of the HIV virus in the mid-1980s, that only 37% tested "positive" out of over 1000? That was the last time they ran any large scale tests.

Did you know that nobody has ever been able to find and photograph the alleged "HIV retrovirus" since that initial "Miraculous" discovery by Dr. Gallo in 1984? Even Luc Montagnier, the French scientist who was given dual-credit for the supposed discovery of HIV, admitted in a fairly recent interview around 2010, that nobody else has ever found and photographed this so-called virus.

Did you know the Perth Group of Australia has submitted hundreds of scientifically sound papers to the WHO and other world infectious dis-ease authorities demonstrating the flaws, errors and mistakes with all the "official" papers making the false claim that they've proven HIV exists?

Did you know Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, tried to write a paper for a grant in the 1990s and was unable to complete it because he couldn't find a scientific paper to uphold the first sentence of his paper which was; "HIV is the probable cause of AIDS". Here's a snippet of his story: https://www.bitchute.com/video/kEUHWpXzYZED/

Did you know there's no "gold standard" AIDS test in existence, exactly like there's no "gold standard" test in existence for Covid19? Without such a gold standard test, all results are, by definition, fraudulent, unreliable and completely unscientific.

Do you know what the AIDS tests actually test for? You would think if they tested for the presence of an HIV virus, that it would be trivial for somebody to isolate and photograph such an entity, wouldn't you? Why can't anybody achieve such a feat? Can you reconcile these facts?

Did you know that AIDS/HIV was the first alleged boogeyman-virus dis-ease where the so-called "presence of antibodies" was the definitive sign that you had the dis-ease? Whereas every so-called viral dis-ease before and since, the presence of antibodies meant you were IMMUNE to the dis-ease? How can you reconcile this strange anomaly?

Did you know there are no known cases of a lab worker accidentally sticking themselves with a needle containing alleged AIDS-tainted blood actually contracting AIDS, despite thousands of examples of this happening?

Did you ever wonder why the alleged HIV boogeyman-virus can only be passed through bodily fluids but cannot become airborne like virtually every other alleged boogeyman-virus known?

Did you know the Bay area doctors that treated the first 100 patients that were said to have AIDS (GRID) had everything figured out within the first 3 months as all 100 patients were living the "fast track gay lifestyle", sharing the same needles taking elicit drugs and all were frequent users of "poppers" (Amyl nitrates). All had "Kaposi's Sarcoma" from huffing the poppers, which are well established poisons.

Did you know AZT was shelved by the FDA as the most toxic drug ever tested for cancer treatment in the history of medicine in the late 1960s?

Did you know Dr. Gallo had burned through hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer money throughout his career in the 60s, 70s and early 80s trying to prove that viruses caused cancer but failed miserably in all his attempts?

Have you ever wondered why Magic Johnson appears to have never had a single problem in his life with his so-called AIDS diagnosis? Could it be because he was instructed to NOT take AZT or any of its precursors?

I could go on and on but hopefully I've made my point. Unless you've researched this topic, then I'm willing to bet you did NOT KNOW any of these facts. Now ask yourself why.

As to your friend, his wife and child, in the early 1990s getting a positive AIDS test was a near-fatal death sentence as the fear was rampant in those days and only one single treatment was on offer - AZT - which is one of the most toxic, deadly poisons known to mankind. It destroys the body from the inside out, not unlike the many poisons used in chemo-non-therapy. The people who survived the fear and terror of this era were the ones who refused to take the AZT treatment. Many of their testimonials can be found on alternative platforms. Many speak of how they watched all their friends die, one by one, but couldn't convince them to stop taking the poisons.

Do you know what people diagnosed with AIDS today are medicated with? They take various pharma drugs that are 1/1000th to 1/5000th the strength of AZT compared to what people diagnosed with AIDS were taking in the late 1980s through the late 1990s. This fact alone succinctly explains why almost nobody dies of "AIDS" in recent times (past 20 years).

I'm very sorry for your friend, his wife and child, but it's a well known fact in alternative health circles, and even in the gay community, that AZT was what killed the vast majority of people fraudulently diagnosed with a non-existent, undefined, umbrella-term dis-ease known as AIDS.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

AIDS is an umbrella term that covers 30 different dis-eases today. In the early 90s it was perhaps 7-10. They added new dis-eases for about two decades to get to the current 30.

Did you know all 30 dis-eases alleged to be a "sign of AIDS" are and have been well described and catalogued in the medical literature for many decades before so-called AIDS came along? How can this be reconciled?

Did you know the one and only time the establishment tested established AIDS patients for the presence of the HIV virus in the mid-1980s, that only 37% tested "positive" out of over 1000? That was the last time they ran any large scale tests.

Did you know that nobody has ever been able to find and photograph the alleged "HIV retrovirus" since that initial "Miraculous" discovery by Dr. Gallo in 1984? Even Luc Montagnier, the French scientist who was given dual-credit for the supposed discovery of HIV, admitted in a fairly recent interview around 2010, that nobody else has ever found and photographed this so-called virus.

Did you know the Perth Group of Australia has submitted hundreds of scientifically sound papers to the WHO and other world infectious dis-ease authorities demonstrating the flaws, errors and mistakes with all the "official" papers making the false claim that they've proven HIV exists?

Did you know Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, tried to write a paper for a grant in the 1990s and was unable to complete it because he couldn't find a scientific paper to uphold the first sentence of his paper which was; "HIV is the probable cause of AIDS". Here's a snippet of his story: https://www.bitchute.com/video/kEUHWpXzYZED/

Did you know there's no "gold standard" AIDS test in existence, exactly like there's no "gold standard" test in existence for Covid19? Without such a gold standard test, all results are, by definition, fraudulent, unreliable and completely unscientific.

Do you know what the AIDS tests actually test for? You would think if they tested for the presence of an HIV virus, that it would be trivial for somebody to isolate and photograph such an entity, wouldn't you? Why can't anybody achieve such a feat? Can you reconcile these facts?

Did you know that AIDS/HIV was the first alleged boogeyman-virus dis-ease where the so-called "presence of antibodies" was the definitive sign that you had the dis-ease? Whereas every so-called viral dis-ease before and since, the presence of antibodies meant you were IMMUNE to the dis-ease? How can you reconcile this strange anomaly?

Did you know there are no known cases of a lab worker accidentally sticking themselves with a needle containing alleged AIDS-tainted blood actually contracting AIDS, despite thousands of examples of this happening?

Did you ever wonder why the alleged HIV boogeyman-virus can only be passed through bodily fluids but cannot become airborne like virtually every other alleged boogeyman-virus known?

Did you know the Bay area doctors that treated the first 100 patients that were said to have AIDS (GRID) had everything figured out within the first 3 months as all 100 patients were living the "fast track gay lifestyle", sharing the same needles taking elicit drugs and all were frequent users of "poppers" (Amyl nitrates). All had "Kaposi's Sarcoma" from huffing the poppers, which are well established poisons.

Did you know AZT was shelved by the FDA as the most toxic drug ever tested for cancer treatment in the history of medicine in the late 1960s?

Did you know Dr. Gallo had burned through hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer money throughout his career in the 60s, 70s and early 80s trying to prove that viruses caused cancer but failed miserably in all his attempts?

I could go on and on but hopefully I've made my point. Unless you've researched this topic, then I'm willing to bet you did NOT KNOW any of these facts. Now ask yourself why.

As to your friend, his wife and child, in the early 1990s getting a positive AIDS test was a near-fatal death sentence as the fear was rampant in those days and only one single treatment was on offer - AZT - which is one of the most toxic, deadly poisons known to mankind. It destroys the body from the inside out, not unlike the many poisons used in chemo-non-therapy. The people who survived the fear and terror of this era were the ones who refused to take the AZT treatment. Many of their testimonials can be found on alternative platforms. Many speak of how they watched all their friends die, one by one, but couldn't convince them to stop taking the poisons.

Do you know what people diagnosed with AIDS today are medicated with? They take various pharma drugs that are 1/1000th to 1/5000th the strength of AZT compared to what people diagnosed with AIDS were taking in the late 1980s through the late 1990s. This fact alone succinctly explains why almost nobody dies of "AIDS" in recent times (past 20 years).

I'm very sorry for your friend, his wife and child, but it's a well known fact in alternative health circles, and even in the gay community, that AZT was what killed the vast majority of people fraudulently diagnosed with a non-existent, undefined, umbrella-term dis-ease known as AIDS.

1 year ago
1 score