Sadly, he also posts clickbait crap stuff. I took him seriously until he began regurgitating NewsPunch rubbish.

The labels of being a "q-follower" and "truther" are NOT evidence of credibility. Actions and content are. And in my book, he has more red flags than I want to see.

Note: it is unabashed clickbaitism to post a highly sensationalized over-the-top accusation and then NOT post any sauce or details, except "Check my website on this <future> date.

When I saw this, it hit the final nail in the coffin for me re: David Sorenson. I'm not saying the majority of the content he references is false, but anyone who utilizes manipulative clickbait methods gets a fail grading in my book.

(ps. I wrote him about the Newspunch content he posted, and he replied saying I'll look into it, but never got back to me on that. For what its worth...)

Sadly, he also posts clickbait crap stuff. I took him seriously until he began regurgitating NewsPunch rubbish.

The labels of being a "q-follower" and "truther" are NOT evidence of credibility. Actions and content are. And in my book, he has failed.

Noe: it is unabashed clickbaitism to post a highly sensationalized over-the-top accusation and then NOT post any sauce or details, except "Check my website on this <future> date.

When I saw this, it hit the final nail in the coffin for me re: David Sorenson.