No, it's the standard with which we need to operate if we're going to sway minds. Otherwise we just make ourselves look like the crazy tin hat conspiracy theorists many already think we are, and turn people off. When that happens, people are aware something is wrong, but stop there. There are a whole bunch of other questions surrounding 9/11 without resorting to clearly edited footage to make the point.

Focusing on the point that of the dozens of cameras in the area, tourists, etc, only one cctv camera caught 5 frames of something hitting the Pentagon? That, as you posted, Rumsfeld initially states that it was a missile? Those are the threads to plant in minds.

My personal opinion would be that things like snake venom in the water and all the other fringe stuff detract from Q. It's distraction.

No, it's the standard with which we need to operate if we're going to sway minds. Otherwise we just make ourselves look like the crazy tin hat conspiracy theorists many already think we are, and turn people off. When that happens, people are aware something is wrong, but stop there. There are a whole bunch of other questions surrounding 9/11 without resorting to clearly edited footage to make the point. Focusing on the point that of the dozens of cameras in the area, tourists, etc, only one cctv camera caught 5 frames of something hitting the Pentagon? That, as you posted, Rumsfeld initially states that it was missile? Those are the threads to plant in minds.

My personal opinion would be that things like snake venom in the water and all the other fringe stuff detract from Q. It's distraction.