Before anyone makes it to "Q," they will have almost certainly gone through a fair bit of "conspiracy theory" stuff. Very little of the bigger controversial information will likely be new to a "normie" that has made it this far. What sets apart a good board from a bad one is not the topics, but the debate.

Talking about even something as "out there" as "Flat Earth" is good because of the evidence that is presented and the debate that occurs. If the debate is sufficiently well thought out it can give everyone something to think about (hopefully). I mean, Q addressed FE, moon landing, aliens, puppets, actors, etc.. Suggesting we shouldn't debate evidence on those topics would be ludicrous.

While I'm sure many, even here, think they know the truth, I suggest no one really knows what the whole truth is about anything. What we can do is present evidence and bring the Gestalt of Many Minds to apply to it through the process of debate. Encouraging such debate is essential. Attempting to cater to the hypothetical "normie" by not presenting the evidence at all, thus stifling debate on it won't help anyone, new or old member, get closer to understanding the truth.

Before anyone makes it to "Q," they will have almost certainly gone through a fair bit of "conspiracy theory" stuff. Very little of the bigger controversial information will likely be new to a "normie" that has made it this far. What sets apart a good board from a bad one is not the topics, but the debate.

Talking about even something as "out there" as "Flat Earth" is good because of the evidence that is presented and the debate that occurs. If the debate is sufficiently well thought out it can give everyone something to think about (hopefully). I mean, Q addressed FE, moon landing, aliens, puppets, actors, etc.. Suggesting we shouldn't debate evidence on those topics would be ludicrous.

While I'm sure many, even here, think they know the truth, I suggest no one really knows what the whole truth is about anything. What we can do is present evidence and bring the Gestalt of Many Minds to apply to it through the process of debate. Encouraging such debate is essential. Attempting to cater to the hypothetical "normies" by not presenting the evidence at all, thus stifling debate on it won't help anyone, new or old member, get closer to understanding the truth.

Before anyone makes it to "Q," they will have almost certainly gone through a fair bit of "conspiracy theory" stuff. Very little of the bigger controversial information will likely be new to a "normie" that has made it this far. What sets apart a good board from a bad one is not the topics, but the debate.

Talking about even something as "out there" as "Flat Earth" is good because of the evidence that is presented and the debate that occurs. If the debate is sufficiently well thought out it can give everyone something to think about (hopefully). I mean, Q addressed FE, moon landing, aliens, puppets, actors, etc.. Suggesting we shouldn't debate evidence on those topics would be ludicrous.

While I'm sure many, even here, think they know the truth, I suggest no one really knows what the whole truth is about anything. What we can do is present evidence and bring the Gestalt of Many Minds to apply to it through the process of debate. Encouraging such debate is essential. Attempting to cater to "normies" by not presenting the evidence at all, thus stifling debate on it won't help anyone, new or old member, get closer to understanding the truth.

Before anyone makes it to "Q," they will have almost certainly gone through a fair bit of "conspiracy theory" stuff. Very little of the bigger controversial information will likely be new to a "normie" that has made it this far. What sets apart a good board from a bad one is not the topics, but the debate.

Talking about even something as "out there" as "Flat Earth" is good because of the evidence that is presented and the debate that occurs. If the debate is sufficiently well thought out it can give everyone something to think about (hopefully). I mean, Q addressed FE, moon landing, aliens, puppets, actors, etc.. Suggesting we shouldn't debate evidence on those topics would be ludicrous.

While I'm sure many, even here, think they know the truth, I suggest no one really knows what the whole truth is about anything. What we can do is present evidence and bring the Gestalt of Many Minds to apply to it. Encouraging debate is essential. Attempting to cater to "normies" by not presenting the evidence at all, and encouraging debate on it won't help anyone, new or old member, get closer to understanding the truth.

Before anyone makes it to "Q," they will have almost certainly gone through a fair bit of "conspiracy theory" stuff. Very little of the bigger controversial information will likely be new to a "normie" that has made it this far. What sets apart a good board from a bad one is not the topics, but the debate.

Talking about even something as "out there" as "Flat Earth" is good because of the evidence that is presented and the debate that occurs. If the debate is sufficiently well thought out it can give everyone something to think about (hopefully). I mean, Q addressed FE, moon landing, aliens, puppets, actors, etc.. Suggesting we shouldn't debate evidence on those topics would be ludicrous.

While I'm sure many, even here,think they know the truth, I suggest no one really knows what the whole truth is about anything. What we can do is present evidence and bring the Gestalt of Many Minds to apply to it. Encouraging debate is essential. Attempting to cater to "normies" by not presenting the evidence at all, and encouraging debate on it won't help anyone, new or old member, get closer to understanding the truth.

Before anyone makes it to "Q," they will have almost certainly gone through a fair bit of "conspiracy theory" stuff. Very little of the bigger controversial information will likely be new to a "normie" that has made it this far. What sets apart a good board from a bad one is not the topics, but the debate.

Talking about even something as "out there" as "Flat Earth" is good because of the evidence that is presented and the debate that occurs. If the debate is sufficiently well thought out it can give everyone something to think about (hopefully). I mean, Q addressed FE, moon landing, aliens, puppets, actors, etc.. Suggesting we shouldn't debate those topics would be ludicrous.

While I'm sure many, even here,think they know the truth, I suggest no one really knows what the whole truth is about anything. What we can do is present evidence and bring the Gestalt of Many Minds to apply to it. Encouraging debate is essential. Attempting to cater to "normies" by not presenting the evidence at all, and encouraging debate on it won't help anyone, new or old member, get closer to understanding the truth.

Before anyone makes it to "Q," they will have almost certainly gone through a fair bit of "conspiracy theory" stuff. Very little of the bigger controversial information will likely be new to a "normie" that has made it this far. What sets apart a good board from a bad one is not the topics, but the debate.

Talking about even something as "out there" as "Flat Earth" is good because of the evidence that is presented and the debate that occurs. If the debate is sufficiently well thought out it can give everyone something to think about (hopefully). I mean, Q addressed FE, moon landing, aliens, puppets, actors, etc.. Suggesting we debate those topics would be ludicrous.

While I'm sure many, even here,think they know the truth, I suggest no one really knows what the whole truth is about anything. What we can do is present evidence and bring the Gestalt of Many Minds to apply to it. Encouraging debate is essential. Attempting to cater to "normies" by not presenting the evidence at all, and encouraging debate on it won't help anyone, new or old member, get closer to understanding the truth.

Before anyone makes it to "Q," they will have almost certainly gone through a fair bit of "conspiracy theory" stuff. Very little of the bigger controversial information will likely be new to a "normie" that has made it this far. What sets apart a good board from a bad one is not the topics, but the debate.

Talking about even something as "out there" as "Flat Earth" is good because of the evidence that is presented and the debate that occurs. If the debate is sufficiently well thought out it can give everyone something to think about (hopefully). I mean, Q addressed FE. Not talking about it would be ludicrous.

While I'm sure many, even here,think they know the truth, I suggest no one really knows what the whole truth is about anything. What we can do is present evidence and bring the Gestalt of Many Minds to apply to it. Encouraging debate is essential. Attempting to cater to "normies" by not presenting the evidence at all, and encouraging debate on it won't help anyone, new or old member, get closer to understanding the truth.

Before anyone makes it to "Q," they will have almost certainly gone through a fair bit of "conspiracy theory" stuff. Very little of the bigger controversial information will likely be new to a "normie" that has made it this far. What sets apart a good board from a bad one is not the topics, but the debate.

Talking about even something as "out there" as "Flat Earth" is good because of the evidence that is presented and the debate that occurs. If the debate is sufficiently well thought out it can give everyone something to think about (hopefully).

While I'm sure many, even here,think they know the truth, I suggest no one really knows what the whole truth is about anything. What we can do is present evidence and bring the Gestalt of Many Minds to apply to it. Encouraging debate is essential. Attempting to cater to "normies" by not presenting the evidence at all, and encouraging debate on it won't help anyone, new or old member, get closer to understanding the truth.

Before anyone makes it to "Q," they will have almost certainly gone through a fair bit of "conspiracy theory" stuff. None of the information will likely be new to a "normie" that has made it this far. What sets apart a good board from a bad one is not the topics, but the debate.

Talking about even something as "out there" as "Flat Earth" is good because of the evidence that is presented and the debate that occurs. If the debate is sufficiently well thought out it can give everyone something to think about (hopefully).

While I'm sure many, even here,think they know the truth, I suggest no one really knows what the whole truth is about anything. What we can do is present evidence and bring the Gestalt of Many Minds to apply to it. Encouraging debate is essential. Attempting to cater to "normies" by not presenting the evidence at all, and encouraging debate on it won't help anyone, new or old member, get closer to understanding the truth.