Again, conspiracies.WIN.

Again, Q wanted us to talk about this stuff.

Till then, it will be on conspiracies.WIN.

Q talked about it before. Shutting down the conversation on stuff that Q gave us to talk about goes directly against Q. This is not a Q board if we are not supposed to talk about Q stuff. It is instead a "what catsfive believes" board. Not the best look to be an information tyrant when professing to be against the information tyranny that got us here.

GAW is a current events site.

From the sidebar:

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes.

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site

If Q talked about it, and left the door open, it's hardly "fringe" now is it?

-Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

So not exactly a "current events site" now is it, because it is also a "topics Q has raised" site.

The above sideboard quote does not say "keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current that catsfive approves of." The "catsfive approval" part is not on there.

Q raised these topics. Q encouraged these topics with his address. You shutting it down has NOTHING to do with GAW or its stated rules. It has to do with what catsfive wants, and nothing more.

You are the one not following the rules based purely on what you personally think "people should be talking about." Guiding the conversation of a group according to your designs sounds a whole lot like some other people who most would consider "bad actors."

Again, conspiracies.WIN.

Again, Q wanted us to talk about this stuff.

Till then, it will be on conspiracies.WIN.

Q talked about it before. Shutting down the conversation on stuff that Q gave us to talk about goes directly against Q. This is not a Q board if we are not supposed to talk about Q stuff. It is instead a "what catsfive believes" board. Not the best look to be an information tyrant when professing to be against the information tyranny that got us here.

GAW is a current events site.

From the sidebar:

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes.

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site

If Q talked about it, and left the door open, it's hardly "fringe" now is it?

-Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

So not exactly a "current events site" now is it, because it is also a "topics Q has raised" site.

The above sideboard quote does not say "keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current that catsfive approves of." The "catsfive approval" part is not on there.

Q raised these topics. Q encouraged these topics with his address. You shutting it down has NOTHING to do with GAW or its stated rules. It has to do with what catsfive wants, and nothing more.

You are the one not following the rules based purely on what you personally think "people should be talking about." Sounds a whole lot like some other people who most would consider "bad actors."