[removed for ulterior purposes] ;)
We need to create a set of rules for determining meaning and value. Then we should attack anyone who does not conform to those rules. NO ORIGINAL THINKING! 🙄
If you don't like number fagging, blame Q and troll patriots win.
Some number fagging by Q:
What brand was the watch that Q liked to post?
- IWC: I=9 W=23 C=3 --> 9+2+3+3=17
Maybe a little gay but... What model watch was it?
- IW390302 --> 3+9+3+2=17
Coincidence? Wait, there's more... When was the watch released?
EDIT: What date did Q post this?
- 03/02/2019 —> 3+2+2+1+9=17
I mean, at some point you have to call a spade a spade.
So maybe don't be a dick to fellow anons over number fagging.
We need to create a set of rules for determining meaning and value. Then we should attack anyone who does not conform to those rules. NO ORIGINAL THINKING! 🙄
If you don't like number fagging, blame Q and troll patriots win.
Some number fagging by Q:
What brand was the watch that Q liked to post?
- IWC: I=9 W=23 C=3 --> 9+2+3+3=17
Maybe a little gay but... What model watch was it?
- IW390302 --> 3+9+3+2=17
Coincidence? Wait, there's more... When was the watch released?
I mean, at some point you have to call a spade a spade.
So maybe don't be a dick to fellow anons over number fagging.
We need to create a set of rules for determining meaning and value. Then we should attack anyone who does not conform to those rules. NO ORIGINAL THINKING! 🙄
If you don't like number fagging, blame Q and troll patriots win.
Some number fagging by Q:
What brand was the watch that Q liked to post?
- IWC: I=9 W=23 C=3 --> 9+2+3+3=17
Maybe a little gay but... When was the watch released?
That's just weird, right? Still... Coincidence? What model watch was it?
- IW390302 --> 3+9+3+2=17
I mean, at some point you have to call a spade a spade.
So maybe don't be a dick to fellow anons over number fagging.
We need to create a set of rules for determining meaning and value. Then we should attack anyone who does not conform to those rules. NO ORIGINAL THINKING! 🙄
If you don't like number fagging, blame Q and troll patriots win.
Some number fagging by Q:
What brand was the watch that Q liked to post?
- IWC: I=9 W=23 C=3 --> 9+2+3+3=17
Maybe a little gay but... When was the watch released?
That's just weird, right? Still... Coincidence? What model watch was it?
- IW390302 --> 3+9+3+2=17
I mean, at some point you have to call a spade a spade.
So maybe don't be a dick to fellow anons over number fagging.
We need to create a set of rules for determining meaning and value. Then we should attack anyone who does not conform to those rules. NO ORIGINAL THINKING! 🙄
If you don't like number fagging, blame Q and troll patriots win.
Some number fagging by Q:
What brand was the watch that Q liked to post?
- IWC: I=9 W=23 C=3 --> 9+2+3+3=17
Maybe a little gay but... When was the watch released?
That's just weird, right? Still... Coincidence? What model watch was it?
- IW390302 --> 3+9+3+2=17
I mean, at some point you have to call a spade a spade.
So maybe don't be a dick to fellow anons over number fagging.
We need to create a set of rules for determining meaning and value. Then we should attack anyone who does not conform to those rules. NO ORIGINAL THINKING! 🙄
If you don't like number fagging, blame Q and troll patriots win.
Some number fagging by Q:
What brand was the watch that Q liked to post?
- IWC: I=9 W=23 C=3 --> 9+2+3+3=17
Maybe a little gay but... When was the watch released?
That's just weird, right? Still... Coincidence? What model watch was it?
- IW390302 --> 3+9+3+2=17
I mean, at some point you have to call a spade a spade.
So maybe don't be a dick to fellow anons over number fagging.