'Wikipedia' seems to be your source for history. Alas, history continues to be altered by those who own the publishing companies. The Rothschild's funded the rise of Hitler's and his Party. I showed you there was proof that an agreement was made between the Zionists and Hitler's Party. Even Goebbels had a special German coin minted to celebrate Zionism and it had a Star of David on one side and a Swastika on the other side. I provided you two important sources for this agreement. Black's "The Transfer Agreement" and Benjamin Freedman's, "Facts Are Facts". You wrote, "...Eisenhower or DeGaulle had into the forming of the NSDAP,..." I never said this. You did. You completely missed the point. Moreover, you did write, "The Party never referred to itself as the "Nazi Party," even though that came to be its attribution in the West." This is why I wrote, "Nor is there any mentioning of the origin of 'Nazi'"......Ergo, regarding Eisenhower, Churchill, and DeGaulle's massive works (over 7000 pages). Albeit, 'Nazi' most likely is a Western concoction, it is IMHO derived from the aforementioned agreement. Again, the reason for the historical ambiguity is from an incessant cover-up of Zionists having a predominant hand in putting Hitler in power. Hitler's ‘Haavara’ Agreement was in essence a competing version of the Balfour Declaration.

'Wikipedia' seems to be your source for history. Alas, history continues to be altered by those who own the publishing companies. The Rothschild's funded the rise of Hitler's and his Party. I showed you there was proof that an agreement was made between the Zionists and Hitler's Party. Even Goebbels had a special German coin minted to celebrate Zionism and it had a Star of David on one side and a Swastika on the other side. I provided you two important sources for this agreement. Black's "The Transfer Agreement" and Benjamin Freedman's, "Facts Are Facts". You wrote, "...Eisenhower or DeGaulle had into the forming of the NSDAP,..." I never said this. You did. You completely missed the point. Moreover, you did write, "The Party never referred to itself as the "Nazi Party," even though that came to be its attribution in the West." This is why I wrote, "Nor is there any mentioning of the origin of 'Nazi'" regarding Eisenhower, Churchill, and DeGaulle's massive works (over 7000 pages). Albeit, 'Nazi' most likely is a Western concoction, it is IMHO derived from the aforementioned agreement. Again, the reason for the historical ambiguity is from an incessant cover-up of Zionists having a predominant hand in putting Hitler in power. Hitler's ‘Haavara’ Agreement was in essence a competing version of the Balfour Declaration.