Say it with me! IF IT DOESN'T HAVE SAUCE, IT MUST BE TOSSED!

**HUGE problem on this forum - unsauced posts! ** Posts that link to content where someone is saying that someone said something with no evidence anywhere that this someone said that! It is often at questionable news sites and twatter posts. Then we have people stating their opinions here regarding the thing that someone said someone said, with no proof they said it!
C'mon frens, wake up here!
This is an information war, misinformation is a trap! Don't take the bait!
When you read something and believe it just because you found it on the internet, it discredits you and the entire truth movement. You then pass that along, you are discredited when whomever you pass that to looks it up and see that you just bought into something you saw online with no proof. Everything you say after that has to be questioned... because you were not using good discernment. It will be assumed you do that with everything.

In this case, Klaus the Schwab has actually said plenty of things to make him a villain that are documentable. Stick with what's true.

Can we get a forum rule of some kind to help prevent this? If a post is stating a fact (rather than a theory) the links must either have sauce or have sauce on the side (another link to prove it). Something along those lines, to prevent THIS from habbening. Thanks!!!

**This is a HUGE problem on this forum - unsauced posts! ** Posts that link to content where someone is saying that someone said something with no evidence anywhere that this someone said that! It is often at questionable news sites and twatter posts. Then we have people stating their opinions here regarding the thing that someone said someone said, with no proof they said it!
C'mon frens, wake up here!
This is an information war, misinformation is a trap! Don't take the bait!
When you read something and believe it just because you found it on the internet, it discredits you and the entire truth movement. You then pass that along, you are discredited when whomever you pass that to looks it up and see that you just bought into something you saw online with no proof. Everything you say after that has to be questioned... because you were not using good discernment. It will be assumed you do that with everything.

In this case, Klaus the Schwab has actually said plenty of things to make him a villain that are documentable. Stick with what's true.

Can we get a forum rule of some kind to help prevent this? If a post is stating a fact (rather than a theory) the links must either have sauce or have sauce on the side (another link to prove it). Something along those lines, to prevent THIS from habbening. Thanks!!!