Traditionally, around 1% of ballots are adjudicated in an election because the tabulator can't read them. This is the same thing as when you stick a dollar bill in a vending machine, and it can't read it, and rejects it. This can be due to a printing error (counterfeit bill) or if it's torn, etc., everyone has probably dealt with this at some point.

In Fulton County the head of elections Richard Barron was on the news saying they were still counting, and I'm trying to remember because it's been a few years, but I believe he came right out and stated that it was taking so long because they had to adjudicate 96% of the ballots! WTF?! I just did a quick search, and here's a quote from a CNN article dated 11/5/20...

Fulton County elections director Richard Barron said his staff and volunteers have about 14,000 mail-in ballots left to be counted, adding they have been counting at a rate of about 3,000 ballots per hour. His team, many of whom have been working since 8 a.m. ET, have so far counted 127,948 ballots and adjudicated 123,716, he said.

Why were so many adjudicated? Because as Jovan Pulitzer showed us in the hearing, they (intentionally) misprinted the ballots, so the tabulators would reject them, and they would have to go to hand adjudication. Remember how he showed us the alignment targets (which is something like a plus sign inside a circle on the corner of the paper) was mis-aligned (intentionally printed that way) so the optical eye of the machine would reject the ballot?

The rules for adjudication are that four people review the ballot, and as a team try to determine the intent of the voter. One poll worker, one Republican observer, one Dem observer, and one Independent observer. That is what is SUPPOSED TO happen.

In Maricopa County the tabulators also rejected ballots, causing sky high adjudication rates. I watched that hearing as well, all 10 hours of it. One witness, an elderly observer testified how she watched, all day long, as poll workers would open ballot envelopes, look at the ballots, and then tear the edge of the paper on about 75% of them. The torn paper caused the tabulators to reject those ballots. It's pretty safe to assume that the ballots that were intentionally torn were for Trump. The witness testified that the stacks of torn/rejected ballots, instead of being adjudicated by a four-person panel, were taken into an office with a locked door, with no observers and no oversight.

In '22 in Maricopa County, they mis-adjusted the paper size, so the machines would reject the ballots. If you watched the hearings (in '20 with Rudy Giuliani) you began to see the pattern in all these key counties.

There is mountains of evidence of multiple avenues of fraud in multiple counties that determine swing-states. WE HAVE IT ALL, and when it's time to play the Trump Card then Q's infamous question of "How do you legally introduce evidence" will be shown to the world. Enjoy the show.

Traditionally, around 1% of ballots are adjudicated in an election because the tabulator can't read them. This is the same thing as when you stick a dollar bill in a vending machine, and it can't read it, and rejects it. This can be due to a printing error (counterfeit bill) or if it's torn, etc., everyone has probably dealt with this at some point.

In Fulton County the head of elections Richard Barron was on the news saying they were still counting, and I'm trying to remember because it's been a few years, but I believe he came right out and stated that it was taking so long because they had to adjudicate 96% of the ballots! WTF?! I just did a quick search, and here's a quote from a CNN article dated 11/5/20...

Fulton County elections director Richard Barron said his staff and volunteers have about 14,000 mail-in ballots left to be counted, adding they have been counting at a rate of about 3,000 ballots per hour. His team, many of whom have been working since 8 a.m. ET, have so far counted 127,948 ballots and adjudicated 123,716, he said.

Why were so many adjudicated? Because as Jovan Pulitzer showed us in the hearing, they (intentionally) misprinted the ballots, so the tabulators would reject them, and they would have to go to hand adjudication. Remember how he showed us the alignment targets (which is something like a plus sign inside a circle on the corner of the paper) was mis-aligned (intentionally printed that way) so the optical eye of the machine would reject the ballot?

The rules for adjudication are that four people review the ballot, and as a team try to determine the intent of the voter. One poll worker, one Republican observer, one Dem observer, and one Independent observer. That is what is SUPPOSED TO happen.

In Maricopa County the tabulators also rejected ballots, causing sky high adjudication rates. I watched that hearing as well, all 10 hours of it. One witness, an elderly observer testified how she watched, all day long, as poll workers would open ballot envelopes, look at the ballots, and then tear the edge of the paper on about 75% of them. The torn paper caused the tabulators to reject those ballots. It's pretty safe to assume that the ballots that were intentionally torn were for Trump. The witness testified that the stacks of torn ballots, instead of being adjudicated by a four-person panel, were taken into an office with a locked door, with no observers and no oversight.

In '22 in Maricopa County, they mis-adjusted the paper size, so the machines would reject the ballots. If you watched the hearings (in '20 with Rudy Giuliani) you began to see the pattern in all these key counties.

There is mountains of evidence of multiple avenues of fraud in multiple counties that determine swing-states. WE HAVE IT ALL, and when it's time to play the Trump Card then Q's infamous question of "How do you legally introduce evidence" will be shown to the world. Enjoy the show.

Traditionally, around 1% of ballots are adjudicated in an election because the tabulator can't read them. This is the same thing as when you stick a dollar bill in a vending machine, and it can't read it, and rejects it. This can be due to a printing error (counterfeit bill) or if it's torn, etc., everyone has probably dealt with this at some point.

In Fulton County the head of elections Richard Barron was on the news saying they were still counting, and I'm trying to remember because it's been a few years, but I believe he came right out and stated that it was taking so long because they had to adjudicate 96% of the ballots! WTF?! I just did a quick search, and here's a quote from a CNN article dated 11/5/20...

Fulton County elections director Richard Barron said his staff and volunteers have about 14,000 mail-in ballots left to be counted, adding they have been counting at a rate of about 3,000 ballots per hour. His team, many of whom have been working since 8 a.m. ET, have so far counted 127,948 ballots and adjudicated 123,716, he said.

Why were so many adjudicated? Because as Jovan Pulitzer showed us in the hearing, they (intentionally) misprinted the ballots, so the tabulators would reject them, and they would have to go to hand adjudication. Remember how he showed us the alignment targets (which is something like a plus sign inside a circle on the corner of the paper) was mis-aligned (intentionally printed that way) so the optical eye of the machine would reject the ballot?

The rules for adjudication are that four people review the ballot, and as a team try to determine the intent of the voter. One poll worker, one Republican observer, one Dem observer, and one Independent observer. That is what is SUPPOSED TO happen.

In Maricopa County the tabulators also rejected ballots, causing sky high adjudication rates. I watched that hearing as well, all 10 hours of it. One witness, and elderly observer testified how she watched, all day long, as poll workers would open ballot envelopes, look at the ballots, and then tear the edge of the paper on about 75% of them. The torn paper caused the tabulators to reject those ballots. It's pretty safe to assume that the ballots that were intentionally torn were for Trump. The witness testified that the stacks of torn ballots, instead of being adjudicated by a four-person panel, were taken into an office with a locked door, with no observers and no oversight.

In '22 in Maricopa County, they mis-adjusted the paper size, so the machines would reject the ballots. If you watched the hearings (in '20 with Rudy Giuliani) you began to see the pattern in all these key counties.

There is mountains of evidence of multiple avenues of fraud in multiple counties that determine swing-states. WE HAVE IT ALL, and when it's time to play the Trump Card then Q's infamous question of "How do you legally introduce evidence" will be shown to the world. Enjoy the show.