You can't ask intelligent questions if you engage in a massive complex of mistaken assumptions. And if you have questions, you need to recognize the answers from the very people who deal with the subject matter (DEWs). The discussion on this board tends to take as a given that DEWs are used as instruments of the Cabal---rather than scrutinizing whether there is any specific evidence they are being used. Ambiguous "evidence" resting on ignorance of real effects or limitations is not worth arguing.

You can't ask intelligent questions if you engage in a massive complex of mistaken assumptions. And if you have questions, you need to recognize the answers from the very people who deal with the subject matter (DEWs). The discussion on this board tends to take take as a given that DEWs are used as instruments of the Cabal---rather than scrutinizing whether there is any specific evidence they are being used. Ambiguous "evidence" resting on ignorance of real effects or limitations is not worth arguing.