I agree with your statement in general, but not in regard to my interaction with the other commenter. Biological meaning real male as opposed to a fake male[woman pretending to be male], or just a woman named Michael... sometimes words are just descriptors to focus on the truth. Maybe some people spend too much time being a peterbeater [?] and miss the primary point of a communication, which is that this commenter was wondering which category the other commenter was coming from with their handle SINCE the research I referred to involved FEMALES. There are biological males and there are pretenders who adopt male names, so there IS a difference and I was correct that judging from the handle he is likely a biological male, not a pretender[female] or an actual female named Michael.

I agree with your statement in general, but not in regard to my interaction with the other commenter. Biological meaning real male as opposed to a fake male[woman pretending to be male], or just a woman named Michael... sometimes words are just descriptors to focus on the truth. Some people spend too much time being a peterbeater and miss the primary point of a communication, which is that this commenter was wondering which category the other commenter was coming from with their handle SINCE the research I referred to involved FEMALES. There are biological males and there are pretenders who adopt male names, so there IS a difference and I was correct that judging from the handle he is likely a biological male, not a pretender[female] or an actual female named Michael.