The axiom stating, "The cover-up is often worse than than the crime itself" is very applicable to Lahaine, Maui. This is the path to exposing it all. Their actions to conceal and to censor the tragedy that occurred is the best way of exposing their crimes. We can see this by asking: Why is everything locked down? Why is a curtain being constructed around the burned out areas? Why is a no-fly zone imposed? Why is there no cell phone use? and why is there a declaration in the Lahaina area as being a restricted area? It appears instead of gathering other community help, this place has become secretive and they are bringing in foreign help. The following are the obvious things the public can acknowledge. So far, we have learned:

• Fire prevention practices throughout the Lahaina area were purposely neglected and previously abandoned.

• There appears to be evidence that fires in Maui were purposely set.

• The water was turned off.

• No fire fighting units were dispatched to prevent the fires from descending into the city.

• The roads were blocked by the police preventing people from escaping in their vehicles when the conflagration rapidly approached.

• Over a thousand people died as a result.

• The cover-up has become blatantly obvious.

• And Why won't the officials mention any word about all the missing children?

IMHO, I believe it is to keep people away from their properties and to keep independent investigations from revealing any facts of dereliction and crimes committed by the mayor and city officials, along with the governor. Then we have the ridiculous story told by the Lahaina Chief of Police, John Pelletier. IMHO, Pellletier statements are designed to justify the cover-up. I seem to recall him saying anyone in the burned out area could unwittingly step on an incinerated body that would destroy any semblance of the victim for identification. This is a crock of Bullsh**. Like many other people, I don't trust Pelletier. He seems to have a dark cloud of controversy follow him every place he is employed.

The narrative being cast by Pelletier is that of cremation. To incinerate means to burn and reduce to ashes. This does not happen to the bones of the victims that died in a conflagration. The human skeleton is composed mostly of carbonates and calcium phosphates and give bone its extraordinary strength and durability to survive the intense heat required for cremation when all other body tissues are destroyed. At approximately 1292 degrees Fahrenheit, calcium phosphates begin to fuse together and change in color of the bone. The bones are not destroyed in a cremation process. Debunking Pelletier's statement is knowing that a carbon fire never reaches the high temperatures of incinerating human bones. The cremation process leaves behind the bones and require pulverization. Modern crematoriums use a pulverizing machine that uses ball bearings or rotating blades, like a blender and is called cremulator.

What Nino Rodriguez and Juan O Savin are speculating on regarding DEWs being used will only receive the official response of 'conspiracy theory' and 'dangerous' misinformation. And more calls to censor the Internet. There is really no way of proving DEWs to the general public as long as the official government response is 'plausible deniability'. It is government's favorite tactic for discrediting anyone, any group that raises questions. Censorship and crackdowns become real possibilities of government to be used. I have no doubt that DEW technology exists and has been used. However, I also believe the government will attempt to discredit any forum that pushes the DEW conspiracy. To me it's a bit of a honey-pot for an entrapment scheme and is part of a multi-tier operation against the American public that is very similar to what was used against Alex Jones. This government is looking for the excuse to implement government defacto restrictions (censorship) across the Internet. We are witnessing this happening in other nations. They are looking for an opportunity to do it here in the US. I earlier provided information that the same tactic used in Lahaine, Maui was successfully deployed in discrediting the DEW conspiracy theory that went viral on the Internet regarding Paradise, CA. The officials put a lid on "misinformation" regarding the Paradise, CA conflagration. Did you know that Judy Wood, Ph.D. was discredited and her career was destroyed for her theory of DEWs being used on the WTC towers? She can't even sell her book and it is listed online."Where Did the Towers Go?".

They axiom stating, "The cover-up is often worse than than the crime itself" is very applicable to Lahaine, Maui. This is the path to exposing it all. Their actions to conceal and to censor the tragedy that occurred is the best way of exposing their crimes. We can see this by asking: Why is everything locked down? Why is a curtain being constructed around the burned out areas? Why is a no-fly zone imposed? Why is there no cell phone use? and why is there a declaration in the Lahaina area as being a restricted area? It appears instead of gathering other community help, this place has become secretive and they are bringing in foreign help. The following are the obvious things the public can acknowledge. So far, we have learned:

• Fire prevention practices throughout the Lahaina area were purposely neglected and previously abandoned.

• There appears to be evidence that fires in Maui were purposely set.

• The water was turned off.

• No fire fighting units were dispatched to prevent the fires from descending into the city.

• The roads were blocked by the police preventing people from escaping in their vehicles when the conflagration rapidly approached.

• Over a thousand people died as a result.

• The cover-up has become blatantly obvious.

• And Why won't the officials mention any word about all the missing children?

IMHO, I believe it is to keep people away from their properties and to keep independent investigations from revealing any facts of dereliction and crimes committed by the mayor and city officials, along with the governor. Then we have the ridiculous story told by the Lahaina Chief of Police, John Pelletier. IMHO, Pellletier statements are designed to justify the cover-up. I seem to recall him saying anyone in the burned out area could unwittingly step on an incinerated body that would destroy any semblance of the victim for identification. This is a crock of Bullsh**. Like many other people, I don't trust Pelletier. He seems to have a dark cloud of controversy follow him every place he is employed.

The narrative being cast by Pelletier is that of cremation. To incinerate means to burn and reduce to ashes. This does not happen to the bones of the victims that died in a conflagration. The human skeleton is composed mostly of carbonates and calcium phosphates and give bone its extraordinary strength and durability to survive the intense heat required for cremation when all other body tissues are destroyed. At approximately 1292 degrees Fahrenheit, calcium phosphates begin to fuse together and change in color of the bone. The bones are not destroyed in a cremation process. Debunking Pelletier's statement is knowing that a carbon fire never reaches the high temperatures of incinerating human bones. The cremation process leaves behind the bones and require pulverization. Modern crematoriums use a pulverizing machine that uses ball bearings or rotating blades, like a blender and is called cremulator.

What Nino Rodriguez and Juan O Savin are speculating on regarding DEWs being used will only receive the official response of 'conspiracy theory' and 'dangerous' misinformation. And more calls to censor the Internet. There is really no way of proving DEWs to the general public as long as the official government response is 'plausible deniability'. It is government's favorite tactic for discrediting anyone, any group that raises questions. Censorship and crackdowns become real possibilities of government to be used. I have no doubt that DEW technology exists and has been used. However, I also believe the government will attempt to discredit any forum that pushes the DEW conspiracy. To me it's a bit of a honey-pot for an entrapment scheme and is part of a multi-tier operation against the American public that is very similar to what was used against Alex Jones. This government is looking for the excuse to implement government defacto restrictions (censorship) across the Internet. We are witnessing this happening in other nations. They are looking for an opportunity to do it here in the US. I earlier provided information that the same tactic used in Lahaine, Maui was successfully deployed in discrediting the DEW conspiracy theory that went viral on the Internet regarding Paradise, CA. The officials put a lid on "misinformation" regarding the Paradise, CA conflagration. Did you know that Judy Wood, Ph.D. was discredited and her career was destroyed for her theory of DEWs being used on the WTC towers? She can't even sell her book and it is listed online."Where Did the Towers Go?".

They axiom stating, "The cover-up is often worse than than the crime itself" is very applicable to Lahaine, Maui. This is the path to exposing it all. Their actions to conceal and to censor the tragedy that occurred is the best way of exposing their crimes. We can see this by asking: Why is everything locked down? Why is a curtain being constructed around the burned out areas? Why is a no-fly zone imposed? Why is there no cell phone use? and why is the Lahaina area a restricted area declaration? It appears instead of gathering other community help, this place has become secretive and they are bringing in foreign help. The following are the obvious things the public can acknowledge. So far, we have learned:

• Fire prevention practices throughout the Lahaina area were purposely neglected and previously abandoned.

• There appears to be evidence that fires in Maui were purposely set.

• The water was turned off.

• No fire fighting units were dispatched to prevent the fires from descending into the city.

• The roads were blocked by the police preventing people from escaping in their vehicles when the conflagration rapidly approached.

• Over a thousand people died as a result.

• The cover-up has become blatantly obvious.

• And Why won't the officials mention any word about all the missing children?

IMHO, I believe it is to keep people away from their properties and to keep independent investigations from revealing any facts of dereliction and crimes committed by the mayor and city officials, along with the governor. Then we have the ridiculous story told by the Lahaina Chief of Police, John Pelletier. IMHO, Pellletier statements are designed to justify the cover-up. I seem to recall him saying anyone in the burned out area could unwittingly step on an incinerated body that would destroy any semblance of the victim for identification. This is a crock of Bullsh**. Like many other people, I don't trust Pelletier. He seems to have a dark cloud of controversy follow him every place he is employed.

The narrative being cast by Pelletier is that of cremation. To incinerate means to burn and reduce to ashes. This does not happen to the bones of the victims that died in a conflagration. The human skeleton is composed mostly of carbonates and calcium phosphates and give bone its extraordinary strength and durability to survive the intense heat required for cremation when all other body tissues are destroyed. At approximately 1292 degrees Fahrenheit, calcium phosphates begin to fuse together and change in color of the bone. The bones are not destroyed in a cremation process. Debunking Pelletier's statement is knowing that a carbon fire never reaches the high temperatures of incinerating human bones. The cremation process leaves behind the bones and require pulverization. Modern crematoriums use a pulverizing machine that uses ball bearings or rotating blades, like a blender and is called cremulator.

What Nino Rodriguez and Juan O Savin are speculating on regarding DEWs being used will only receive the official response of 'conspiracy theory' and 'dangerous' misinformation. And more calls to censor the Internet. There is really no way of proving DEWs to the general public as long as the official government response is 'plausible deniability'. It is government's favorite tactic for discrediting anyone, any group that raises questions. Censorship and crackdowns become real possibilities of government to be used. I have no doubt that DEW technology exists and has been used. However, I also believe the government will attempt to discredit any forum that pushes the DEW conspiracy. To me it's a bit of a honey-pot for an entrapment scheme and is part of a multi-tier operation against the American public that is very similar to what was used against Alex Jones. This government is looking for the excuse to implement government defacto restrictions (censorship) across the Internet. We are witnessing this happening in other nations. They are looking for an opportunity to do it here in the US. I earlier provided information that the same tactic used in Lahaine, Maui was successfully deployed in discrediting the DEW conspiracy theory that went viral on the Internet regarding Paradise, CA. The officials put a lid on "misinformation" regarding the Paradise, CA conflagration. Did you know that Judy Wood, Ph.D. was discredited and her career was destroyed for her theory of DEWs being used on the WTC towers? She can't even sell her book and it is listed online."Where Did the Towers Go?".

They axiom stating the cover-up is often worse than than the crime itself. This is what we are seeing in Lahaina, Maui. Their actions to conceal and to censor the tragedy that occurred is the best way of exposing their crimes. We can see this by asking: Why is everything locked down? Why is a curtain being constructed around the burned out areas? Why is a no-fly zone imposed? Why is there no cell phone use? and why is the Lahaina area a restricted area declaration? It appears instead of gathering other community help, this place has become secretive and they are bringing in foreign help. The following are the obvious things the public can acknowledge. So far, we have learned:

• Fire prevention practices throughout the Lahaina area were purposely neglected and previously abandoned.

• There appears to be evidence that fires in Maui were purposely set.

• The water was turned off.

• No fire fighting units were dispatched to prevent the fires from descending into the city.

• The roads were blocked by the police preventing people from escaping in their vehicles when the conflagration rapidly approached.

• Over a thousand people died as a result.

• The cover-up has become blatantly obvious.

• And Why won't the officials mention any word about all the missing children?

IMHO, I believe it is to keep people away from their properties and to keep independent investigations from revealing any facts of dereliction and crimes committed by the mayor and city officials, along with the governor. Then we have the ridiculous story told by the Lahaina Chief of Police, John Pelletier. IMHO, Pellletier statements are designed to justify the cover-up. I seem to recall him saying anyone in the burned out area could unwittingly step on an incinerated body that would destroy any semblance of the victim for identification. This is a crock of Bullsh**. Like many other people, I don't trust Pelletier. He seems to have a dark cloud of controversy follow him every place he is employed.

The narrative being cast by Pelletier is that of cremation. To incinerate means to burn and reduce to ashes. This does not happen to the bones of the victims that died in a conflagration. The human skeleton is composed mostly of carbonates and calcium phosphates and give bone its extraordinary strength and durability to survive the intense heat required for cremation when all other body tissues are destroyed. At approximately 1292 degrees Fahrenheit, calcium phosphates begin to fuse together and change in color of the bone. The bones are not destroyed in a cremation process. Debunking Pelletier's statement is knowing that a carbon fire never reaches the high temperatures of incinerating human bones. The cremation process leaves behind the bones and require pulverization. Modern crematoriums use a pulverizing machine that uses ball bearings or rotating blades, like a blender and is called cremulator.

What Nino Rodriguez and Juan O Savin are speculating on regarding DEWs being used will only receive the official response of 'conspiracy theory' and 'dangerous' misinformation. And more calls to censor the Internet. There is really no way of proving DEWs to the general public as long as the official government response is 'plausible deniability'. It is government's favorite tactic for discrediting anyone, any group that raises questions. Censorship and crackdowns become real possibilities of government to be used. I have no doubt that DEW technology exists and has been used. However, I also believe the government will attempt to discredit any forum that pushes the DEW conspiracy. To me it's a bit of a honey-pot for an entrapment scheme and is part of a multi-tier operation against the American public that is very similar to what was used against Alex Jones. This government is looking for the excuse to implement government defacto restrictions (censorship) across the Internet. We are witnessing this happening in other nations. They are looking for an opportunity to do it here in the US. I earlier provided information that the same tactic used in Lahaine, Maui was successfully deployed in discrediting the DEW conspiracy theory that went viral on the Internet regarding Paradise, CA. The officials put a lid on "misinformation" regarding the Paradise, CA conflagration. Did you know that Judy Wood, Ph.D. was discredited and her career was destroyed for her theory of DEWs being used on the WTC towers? She can't even sell her book and it is listed online."Where Did the Towers Go?".