The issue is the disconnect between what Q provided, and how anons continue to interpret it.

Everyone knows that the primary criticism of Q is the implicit complacency among those who "follow" Q --- the WH military is currently in control (via CoG / Law of war / Devolution), and DJT is still President. IOW a complete inversion of all face value circumstances perceived by the American population (left and right).

None of which Q ever indicated. But it maintains as the most powerful narrative, here and elsewhere, and it completely recolors the interpretive lens of current events - these are not real world events with real world consequences, at least nothing that threatens a positive outcome (by 2024? 2028? 2030?) after some moving target precipice is reached.

So how on earth can those of us, springboarding off of Q interpreting the world today through this CoG / Law of War / Devolution, be able to work alongside patriots who absolutely reject all of that as wishful thinking and fantasyland? It's a major wedge in the MAGA movement. By design? Infiltration of Q influencers that have steered the movement towards this unofficial "you're watching a movie" narrative? I don't know, but it needs to get resolved one way or another.

The issue is the disconnect between what Q provided, and how anons continue to interpret it.

Everyone knows that the primary criticism of Q is the implicit complacency among those who "follow" Q --- the WH military is currently in control (via CoG / Law of war / Devolution), and DJT is still President. IOW a complete inversion of all face value circumstances perceived by the American population (left and right).

None of which Q ever indicated. But it maintains as the most powerful narrative, here and elsewhere, and it completely recolors the interpretive lens of current events - these are not real world events with real world consequences, at least nothing that threatens a positive outcome (by 2024? 2028? 2030?) after some moving target precipice is reached.

So how on earth can those of us, springboarding off of Q interpreting the world today through this CoG / Law of War / Devolution, be able to work alongside patriots who absolutely reject all of that as wishful thinking and fantasyland? It's a major wedge in the MAGA movement. By design? I don't know, but it needs to get resolved one way or another.

The issue is the disconnect between what Q provided, and how anons continue to interpret it.

Everyone knows that the primary criticism of Q is the implicit complacency among those who "follow" Q --- i.e. the patriot military is currently in control via CoG / law of war, and Trump is still President. An inversion of all face value circumstances perceived by the American population (left and right).

None of which Q ever indicated. But it maintains as the most powerful narrative, here and elsewhere, and it completely recolors the interpretive lens of current events - these are not real world events with real world consequences, at least nothing that threatens a positive outcome (by 2024? 2028? 2030?) after some moving target precipice is reached.