I don't disagree with a single word you said except the last sentence. I agree that it is important for people to understand the mind games that have been played to drive a hidden agenda. My protest has nothing to do with that. My protest is against the use of LAW (in this case by Sovereign decree) to limit people's choice of words.

The new governor is just putting things back they way they were to RESTORE natural, biological women's names and descriptors.

The new governor is NOT putting things back, they are making a decree, by fiat, of allowed speech by the individuals who make up the laws and documents of the government. I'm not saying the rhetoric shouldn't be changed. I am saying such statements of law (AKA forced coercion) are not the way to do it.

The only way to change a persons mind in the right way is to present your argument and evidence, keep the debate perpetually open for discussion, and let people decide for themselves. Any such attempt to place a limit on choice, through the use of coercion (the definition of law), is a direct attempt to violate the individuals inalienable Rights. No matter who that person works for, or what their job is, they are still an individual, and have the same inalienable Rights that must not be infringed. Any attempt by government to infringe on those Rights is, by definition, tyranny. No matter how many people agree with the direction of those violations, that doesn't make it not Tyranny.

I don't disagree with a single word you said except the last sentence. I agree that it is important for people to understand the mind games that have been played to drive a hidden agenda. My protest has nothing to do with that. My protest is against the use of LAW (in this case by Sovereign decree) to limit people's choice of words.

The new governor is just putting things back they way they were to RESTORE natural, biological women's names and descriptors.

The new governor is NOT putting things back, they are making a statement of allowed behavior by the individuals who make up the laws and documents of the government. I'm not saying the rhetoric shouldn't be changed. I am saying such statements of law (AKA forced coercion) are not the way to do it.

The only way to change a persons mind in the right way is to present your argument and evidence, keep the debate perpetually open for discussion, and let people decide for themselves. Any such attempt to place a limit on choice, through the use of coercion (the definition of law), is a direct attempt to violate the individuals inalienable Rights. No matter who that person works for, or what their job is, they are still an individual, and have the same inalienable Rights that must not be infringed. Any attempt by government to infringe on those Rights is, by definition, tyranny. No matter how many people agree with the direction of those violations, that doesn't make it not Tyranny.

I don't disagree with a single word you said except the last sentence. I agree that it is important for people to understand the mind games that have been played to drive a hidden agenda. My protest has nothing to do with that. My protest is against the use of LAW (in this case by Sovereign decree) to limit people's choice of words.

The new governor is just putting things back they way they were to RESTORE natural, biological women's names and descriptors.

The new governor is NOT putting things back, they are making a statement of allowed behavior by the individuals who make up the laws and documents of the government. I'm not saying the rhetoric shouldn't be changed. I am saying such statements of law (AKA forced coercion) are not the way to do it.

The only way to change a persons mind in the right way is to present your argument and evidence, keep the debate perpetually open for discussion, and let people decide for themselves. Any such attempt to place a limit on choice through the use of coercion (the definition of law) is a direct violation of the individuals inalienable Rights. No matter who that person works for, or what their job is, they are still an individual, and have the same inalienable Rights that must not be infringed. Any attempt by government to infringe on those Rights is, by definition, tyranny. No matter how many people agree with the direction of those violations, that doesn't make it not Tyranny.

I don't disagree with a single word you said except the last sentence. I agree that it is important for people to understand the mind games that have been played to drive a hidden agenda. My protest has nothing to do with that. My protest is against the use of LAW (in this case by Sovereign decree) to limit people's choice of words.

The new governor is just putting things back they way they were to RESTORE natural, biological women's names and descriptors.

The new governor is NOT putting things back, they are making a statement of allowed behavior by the individuals who make up the laws and documents of the government. I'm not saying the rhetoric shouldn't be changed. I am saying such statements of law (AKA forced coercion) are not the way to do it.

The only way to change a persons mind in the right way is to present your argument and evidence, keep the debate perpetually open for discussion, and let people decide for themselves. Any such attempt to place a limit on choice through the use of coercion (the definition of law) is a direct violation of the individuals inalienable Rights. No matter who that person works for, or what their job is, they are still an individual, and have the same inalienable Rights that must not be infringed. Any infringement of those Rights is, by definition, tyranny. No matter how many people agree with the direction of those violations, that doesn't make it not Tyranny.

I don't disagree with a single word you said except the last sentence. I agree that it is important for people to understand the mind games that have been played to drive a hidden agenda. My protest has nothing to do with that. My protest is against the use of LAW (in this case by Sovereign decree) to limit people's choice of words.

The new governor is just putting things back they way they were to RESTORE natural, biological women's names and descriptors.

The new governor is NOT putting things back, they are making a statement of allowed behavior by the individuals who make up the laws and documents of the government. I'm not saying the rhetoric shouldn't be changed. I am saying such statements of law (AKA forced coercion) are not the way to do it.

The only way to change a persons mind in the right way is to present your argument and evidence, keep the debate perpetually open for discussion, and let people decide for themselves. Any attempt to place a limit on choice through the use of coercion (the definition of law) is a direct violation of the individuals inalienable Rights. No matter who that person works for, or what their job is, they are still an individual, and have the same inalienable Rights that must not be infringed. Any infringement of those Rights is, by definition, tyranny. No matter how many people agree with the direction of those violations, that doesn't make it not Tyranny.