A modest opinion.
<edit>
I'll save it for another day.
A modest opinion.
<edit.
I'll save it for another day.
A modest opinion.
Even not attending GAW very much in the past few weeks, even then I have noticed now a significant number of our prolific posters posting ThePeople'sVoice clickbait without any level of attention to omission of factual basis for headlines, etc.
Now, ANOTHER TPV article has been stickied, this time under a different name, different website, with similar formatting, colors scheme and layout as TPV.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17rlrMUqM5/wef-professor-says-parents-will-/
Compare.
Mods stickying TPV content, WITHOUT any apparent concern about legitimacy or not, prolific posters posting TPV content (with bullshit headlines and lead assertions) also without a modicum of discernment, information or questioning of the headline assertions.
"Hey, I'm POSTING here! I cannot be expected to check or verify any of the validity of what I'm posting! That would take ..... minutes of my time!"
At this point, it makes me wonder what the F is going on at GAW.
If our mod team and most prolific posters cannot even bother to filter this sort of overt and obvious clickbait content targeting the very foundations of our movement, then honestly, what good is GAW?
Is there ANY discernment left here/
Modest proposal: The posting of TPV content should elicit a warning in first case, short ban in second. TPV content in whatever form, if posted without ANY effort to verify or qualify the rubbish headlines used to lead the content, should receive a reprimand.
Posting of this content is increasingly prolific, with promotions by the mod team (stickying) and zero application of the GAW general rule: "HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO participation only! Please respect other readers' time."
So many GAW participants reacting to non-existent dramas. How is this helpful or productive?
In the above case, the idiotic academic is not a professor, has no association with the WEF, and a cursory dig reveals no evidence out there that the University of Colorado Boulder is "WEF-funded". But lets sticky it, get all up in arms because its sooooooo bad. Well, no shit Sherlock. There are morons and vile minions out there.
Without any real support from the mod team or primary posters in terms of them policing themselves or vetting such content, perhaps its expected that board members should just shut up. Or spend hours and hours attempting to vet and police it for the board, to raise attention and raise awareness. I have plenty of other things to do. We all do.
Perhaps GAW has moved a LONG way from being a Q research board, when bulldust clickbait goes for valid posting. And people seem to not even BOTHER to dig to see if there is any validity. It's all just click and comment, NO digging, No verification, No research.
Sigh. This state of affairs is so unnecessary, but it requires the mod team to take the issue seriously and collectively consider the way this behavior impacts on GAW reader quality.
Not to throw a hissy fit, but this situation, in my modest opinion, is both unnecessary and bordering on the ludicrous.
A modest opinion.
Even not attending GAW very much in the past few weeks, even then I have noticed now a significant number of our prolific posters posting ThePeople'sVoice clickbait without any level of attention to omission of factual basis for headlines, etc.
Now, ANOTHER TPV article has been stickied, this time under a different name, different website, with similar formatting, colors scheme and layout as TPV.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17rlrMUqM5/wef-professor-says-parents-will-/
Compare.
Mods stickying TPV content, WITHOUT any apparent concern about legitimacy or not, prolific posters posting TPV content (with bullshit headlines and lead assertions) also without a modicum of discernment, information or questioning of the headline assertions.
At this point, it makes me wonder what the F is going on at GAW.
If our mod team and most prolific posters cannot even bother to filter this sort of overt and obvious clickbait content targeting the very foundations of our movement, then honestly, what good is GAW?
Is there ANY discernment left here/
Modest proposal: The posting of TPV content should elicit a warning in first case, short ban in second. TPV content in whatever form, if posted without ANY effort to verify or qualify the rubbish headlines used to lead the content, should receive a reprimand.
Posting of this content is increasingly prolific, with promotions by the mod team (stickying) and zero application of the GAW general rule: "HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO participation only! Please respect other readers' time."
So many GAW participants reacting to non-existent dramas. How is this helpful or productive?
In the above case, the idiotic academic is not a professor, has no association with the WEF, and a cursory dig reveals no evidence out there that the University of Colorado Boulder is "WEF-funded". But lets sticky it, get all up in arms because its sooooooo bad. Well, no shit Sherlock. There are morons and vile minions out there.
Without any real support from the mod team or primary posters in terms of them policing themselves or vetting such content, perhaps its expected that board members should just shut up. Or spend hours and hours attempting to vet and police it for the board, to raise attention and raise awareness. I have plenty of other things to do. We all do.
Perhaps GAW has moved a LONG way from being a Q research board, when bulldust clickbait goes for valid posting. And people seem to not even BOTHER to dig to see if there is any validity. It's all just click and comment, NO digging, No verification, No research.
Sigh. This state of affairs is so unnecessary, but it requires the mod team to take the issue seriously and collectively consider the way this behavior impacts on GAW reader quality.
Not to throw a hissy fit, but this situation, in my modest opinion, is both unnecessary and bordering on the ludicrous.
A modest opinion.
Even not attending GAW very much in the past few weeks, even then I have noticed now a significant number of our prolific posters posting ThePeople'sVoice clickbait without any level of attention to omission of factual basis for headlines, etc.
Now, ANOTHER TPV article has been stickied, this time under a different name, different website, with similar formatting, colors scheme and layout as TPV.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17rlrMUqM5/wef-professor-says-parents-will-/
Compare.
Mods stickying TPV content, WITHOUT any apparent concern about legitimacy or not, prolific posters posting TPV content (with bullshit headlines and lead assertions) also without a modicum of discernment, information or questioning of the headline assertions.
At this point, it makes me wonder what the F is going on at GAW.
If our mod team and most prolific posters cannot even bother to filter this sort of overt and obvious clickbait content targeting the very foundations of our movement, then honestly, what good is GAW?
Is there ANY discernment left here/
Modest proposal; The posting of TPV content should elicit at least a short ban. TPV content in whatever form, if posted without ANY effort to verify or qualify the rubbish headlines used to lead the content, should receive a reprimand.
Posting of this content is increasingly prolific, with promotions by the mod team (stickying) and zero application of the GAW general rule: "HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO participation only! Please respect other readers' time."
so many GAW participants reacting to non-existent dramas. How is this helpful or productive?
In the above case, the idiotic academic is not a professor, has no association with the WEF, and a cursory dig reveals no evidence out there that the University of Colorado Boulder is "WEF-funded".
Without any real support from the mod team or primary posters in terms of them policing or vetting such content, I think that board members like myself should really just give up, plain and simply.
GAW has moved a LONG way from being a Q research board, where bulldust clickbait goes for valid posting. And people seem to not even BOTHER to dig to see if there is any validity. It's all just click and comment, NO digging, No verification, No research.
Sigh. This state of affairs is so necessary, but it requires the mod team to take the issue seriously and collectively consider the way this behavior impacts on GAW reader quality.