The question is this, was Hitler truly evil?

Yes.

If you say yes, keep digging. If you say no, keep digging.

I will, because I always will, but I don't need to to elaborate sufficient for this discussion.

Hitler was just a front man. He didn't really do anything but be a front man. He was a Cabal agent, and as such he did a lot of very evil things.

there is not one historical document that supports the biggest atrocity he is accused

Just because it is unlikely that "six million Jews were killed in gas chambers" doesn't mean there weren't a ton of other atrocities committed by him and other Nazis. One of the things the "holocaust" narrative does is hide the other evil shit. Because the evidence for it is weak, it also helps create a controlled opposition narrative where Hitler is some sort of hero, which itself helps to further hide the real actions of the Nazis and their real purpose. Both sides controlled by the same lie...

there is a ton of evidence that proves that WW2 was a complete lie and the propaganda machine

Yes it was. WWII was controlled, 100% on both sides by the exact same entity sitting at the top, pulling the strings of everyone. Like a game of chess, being played by one person.

One of the primary purposes of WWII (and WWI for that matter) was to push the Jews into Palestine to create the State of Israel to fulfil prophecy. Hitler was working for the Jews (or rather, a few very rich people who called themselves Jews). Hitler was nothing but the frontman for that endeavor. The rhetoric that he pushed about "the Jews" was mostly true, which is why it is easy to make people think:

we were fighting the wrong side

The problem with that idea is that it wasn't "the Jews" that were doing those things that the Nazi propaganda machine was pushing, it was a few very rich people who called themselves Jews. It is an association fallacy. An intentional one, designed specifically to create an environment which would make any Jew living in Europe feel the need to leave. It is thus with this impetus, and economic and immigration policies put into place all across the world that helped facilitate a mass Jewish exodus from Europe to Palestine. Indeed, this endeavor pushed 3 million Jews into Palestine, something they had been trying to do for almost a hundred years prior to WWII. Hitler and the Nazis ensured the creation of the State of Israel in a thousand ways.

Oh, and btw, Hitler was a Jew (a quarter Jew). So were many of his generals and scientists and army, etc. There were top level Jewish Nazis all the way through the war. Some of these half Jews/quarter Jews remained Nazis all the way up until they moved to America under Operation Paperclip. Hell, some of them were even tried at the Nuremberg trials.

Hitler today is portrayed as an evil dictator that wanted to eliminate one group of people.

It may be a lie. It is impossible to know his real motivations for anything. He did what he was told to do by his handlers. But he absolutely pushed a ton of rhetoric to that effect. I suggest he didn't really want that to happen. Indeed, what he really wanted to happen was exactly what did happen (the creation of the State of Israel) but the rhetoric to that effect is everywhere in the primary sources.

I would suggest reading a few books that Henry Ford wrote.

I have. He, like the Nazi rhetoric, makes the exact same association fallacy. He blames "the Jews" when in fact it was a very, very small subset of them that were running the show. The rest of the Jews were victims of the few that sat at the top of that ethnic group. Just like American's are victims of their own "1%" (I suggest it is actually far less than 1%, but the number has meaning to most, so it is sufficient).

Then dig around and watch a few of Hitler's speeches because they are pretty powerful.

I agree. You should also read Mein Kampf, as well as other works by Goebbels and other top Nazis. There is a lot of good evidence to be found in there. They all make that same association fallacy in their rhetoric however, blaming the larger group for the ministrations of a handful of the most rich and powerful.

The same people who controlled so much then still control so much now and these are the true vermin we need to eliminate

Yup. A small handful of people, not all of whom are of that specific ethnicity. They hide behind the larger group however, which encourages people to see the wrong enemy.

History is always written by the victors

Meh, sorta. History is written by the publishers. The publishers just so happen to be the exact same people as "the victors," but the people that write history are automatically the victors, because they control both sides of each and every war for at least the past 250 years.

The question is this, was Hitler truly evil?

Yes.

If you say yes, keep digging. If you say no, keep digging.

I will, because I always will, but I don't need to to elaborate sufficient for this discussion.

Hitler was just a front man. He didn't really do anything but be a front man. He was a Cabal agent, and as such he did a lot of very evil things.

there is not one historical document that supports the biggest atrocity he is accused

Just because it is unlikely that "six million Jews were killed in gas chambers" doesn't mean there weren't a ton of other atrocities committed by him and other Nazis. One of the things the "holocaust" narrative does is hide the other evil shit. Because the evidence for it is weak, it also helps create a controlled opposition narrative where Hitler is some sort of hero, which itself helps to further hide the real actions of the Nazis and their real purpose. Both sides controlled by the same lie...

there is a ton of evidence that proves that WW2 was a complete lie and the propaganda machine

Yes it was. WWII was controlled, 100% on both sides by the exact same entity sitting at the top, pulling the strings of everyone. Like a game of chess, being played by one person.

One of the primary purposes of WWII (and WWI for that matter) was to push the Jews into Palestine to create the State of Israel to fulfil prophecy. Hitler was working for the Jews (or rather, a few very rich people who called themselves Jews). Hitler was nothing but the frontman for that endeavor. The rhetoric that he pushed about "the Jews" was mostly true, which is why it is easy to make people think:

we were fighting the wrong side

The problem with that idea is that it wasn't "the Jews" that were doing those things that the Nazi propaganda machine was pushing, it was a few very rich people who called themselves Jews. It is an association fallacy. An intentional one, designed specifically to create an environment which would make any Jew living in Europe feel the need to leave. It is thus with this impetus, and economic and immigration policies put into place all across the world that helped facilitate a mass Jewish exodus from Europe to Palestine. Indeed, this endeavor pushed 3 million Jews into Palestine, something they had been trying to do for almost a hundred years prior to WWII. Hitler and the Nazis ensured the creation of the State of Israel in a thousand ways.

Oh, and btw, Hitler was a Jew (a quarter Jew). So were many of his generals and scientists and army, etc. There were top level Jewish Nazis all the way through the war. Some of these half Jews/quarter Jews remained Nazis all the way up until they moved to America under Operation Paperclip. Hell, some of them were even tried at the Nuremberg trials.

Hitler today is portrayed as an evil dictator that wanted to eliminate one group of people.

It may be a lie. It is impossible to know his real motivations for anything. He did what he was told to do by his handlers. But he absolutely pushed a ton of rhetoric to that effect. I suggest he didn't really want that to happen. Indeed, what he really wanted to happen was exactly what did happen (the creation of the State of Israel) but the rhetoric to that effect is everywhere in the primary sources.

I would suggest reading a few books that Henry Ford wrote.

I have. He, like the Nazi rhetoric, makes the exact same assocciation fallacy. He blames "the Jews" when in fact it was a very, very small subset of them that were running the show. The rest of the Jews were victims of the few that sat at the top of that ethnic group. Just like American's are victims of their own "1%" (I suggest it is actually far less than 1%, but the number has meaning to most, so it is sufficient).

Then dig around and watch a few of Hitler's speeches because they are pretty powerful.

I agree. You should also read Mein Kampf, as well as other works by Goebbels and other top Nazis. There is a lot of good evidence to be found in there. They all make that same association fallacy in their rhetoric however, blaming the larger group for the ministrations of a handful of the most rich and powerful.

The same people who controlled so much then still control so much now and these are the true vermin we need to eliminate

Yup. A small handful of people, not all of whom are of that specific ethnicity. They hide behind the larger group however, which allows for people to see the wrong enemy.

History is always written by the victors

Meh, sorta. History is written by the publishers. The publishers just so happen to be the exact same people as "the victors," but the people that write history are automatically the victors, because they control both sides of each and every war for at least the past 250 years.

The question is this, was Hitler truly evil?

Yes.

If you say yes, keep digging. If you say no, keep digging.

I will, because I always will, but I don't need to to elaborate sufficient for this discussion.

Hitler was just a front man. He didn't really do anything but be a front man. He was a Cabal agent, and as such he did a lot of very evil things.

there is not one historical document that supports the biggest atrocity he is accused

Just because it is unlikely that "six million Jews were killed in gas chambers" doesn't mean there weren't a ton of other atrocities committed by him and other Nazis. One of the things the "holocaust" narrative does is hide the other evil shit. Because the evidence for it is weak, it also helps create a controlled opposition narrative where Hitler is some sort of hero, which itself helps to further hide the real actions of the Nazis and their real purpose.

there is a ton of evidence that proves that WW2 was a complete lie and the propaganda machine

Yes it was. WWII was controlled, 100% on both sides by the exact same entity sitting at the top, pulling the strings of everyone. Like a game of chess, being played by one person.

One of the primary purposes of WWII (and WWI for that matter) was to push the Jews into Palestine to create the State of Israel to fulfil prophecy. Hitler was working for the Jews (or rather, a few very rich people who called themselves Jews). Hitler was nothing but the frontman for that endeavor. The rhetoric that he pushed about "the Jews" was mostly true, which is why it is easy to make people think:

we were fighting the wrong side

The problem with that idea is that it wasn't "the Jews" that were doing those things that the Nazi propaganda machine was pushing, it was a few very rich people who called themselves Jews. It is an association fallacy. An intentional one, designed specifically to create an environment which would make any Jew living in Europe feel the need to leave. It is thus with this impetus, and economic and immigration policies put into place all across the world that helped facilitate a mass Jewish exodus from Europe to Palestine. Indeed, this endeavor pushed 3 million Jews into Palestine, something they had been trying to do for almost a hundred years prior to WWII. Hitler and the Nazis ensured the creation of the State of Israel in a thousand ways.

Oh, and btw, Hitler was a Jew (a quarter Jew). So were many of his generals and scientists and army, etc. There were top level Jewish Nazis all the way through the war. Some of these half Jews/quarter Jews remained Nazis all the way up until they moved to America under Operation Paperclip. Hell, some of them were even tried at the Nuremberg trials.

Hitler today is portrayed as an evil dictator that wanted to eliminate one group of people.

It may be a lie. It is impossible to know his real motivations for anything. He did what he was told to do by his handlers. But he absolutely pushed a ton of rhetoric to that effect. I suggest he didn't really want that to happen. Indeed, what he really wanted to happen was exactly what did happen (the creation of the State of Israel) but the rhetoric to that effect is everywhere in the primary sources.

I would suggest reading a few books that Henry Ford wrote.

I have. He, like the Nazi rhetoric, makes the exact same assocciation fallacy. He blames "the Jews" when in fact it was a very, very small subset of them that were running the show. The rest of the Jews were victims of the few that sat at the top of that ethnic group. Just like American's are victims of their own "1%" (I suggest it is actually far less than 1%, but the number has meaning to most, so it is sufficient).

Then dig around and watch a few of Hitler's speeches because they are pretty powerful.

I agree. You should also read Mein Kampf, as well as other works by Goebbels and other top Nazis. There is a lot of good evidence to be found in there. They all make that same association fallacy in their rhetoric however, blaming the larger group for the ministrations of a handful of the most rich and powerful.

The same people who controlled so much then still control so much now and these are the true vermin we need to eliminate

Yup. A small handful of people, not all of whom are of that specific ethnicity. They hide behind the larger group however, which allows for people to see the wrong enemy.

History is always written by the victors

Meh, sorta. History is written by the publishers. The publishers just so happen to be the exact same people as "the victors," but the people that write history are automatically the victors, because they control both sides of each and every war for at least the past 250 years.

The question is this, was Hitler truly evil?

Yes.

If you say yes, keep digging. If you say no, keep digging.

I will, because I always will, but I don't need to to elaborate sufficient for this discussion.

Hitler was just a front man. He didn't really do anything but be a front man. He was a Cabal agent, and as such he did a lot of very evil things.

there is not one historical document that supports the biggest atrocity he is accused

Just because it is unlikely that "six million Jews were killed in gas chambers" doesn't mean there weren't a ton of other atrocities committed by him and other Nazis. One of the things the "holocaust" narrative does is hide the other evil shit. Because the evidence for it is weak, it also helps create a controlled opposition narrative which itself helps to further hide the real actions of the Nazis and their real purpose.

there is a ton of evidence that proves that WW2 was a complete lie and the propaganda machine

Yes it was. WWII was controlled, 100% on both sides by the exact same entity sitting at the top, pulling the strings of everyone. Like a game of chess, being played by one person.

One of the primary purposes of WWII (and WWI for that matter) was to push the Jews into Palestine to create the State of Israel to fulfil prophecy. Hitler was working for the Jews (or rather, a few very rich people who called themselves Jews). Hitler was nothing but the frontman for that endeavor. The rhetoric that he pushed about "the Jews" was mostly true, which is why it is easy to make people think:

we were fighting the wrong side

The problem with that idea is that it wasn't "the Jews" that were doing those things that the Nazi propaganda machine was pushing, it was a few very rich people who called themselves Jews. It is an association fallacy. An intentional one, designed specifically to create an environment which would make any Jew living in Europe feel the need to leave. It is thus with this impetus, and economic and immigration policies put into place all across the world that helped facilitate a mass Jewish exodus from Europe to Palestine. Indeed, this endeavor pushed 3 million Jews into Palestine, something they had been trying to do for almost a hundred years prior to WWII. Hitler and the Nazis ensured the creation of the State of Israel in a thousand ways.

Oh, and btw, Hitler was a Jew (a quarter Jew). So were many of his generals and scientists and army, etc. There were top level Jewish Nazis all the way through the war. Some of these half Jews/quarter Jews remained Nazis all the way up until they moved to America under Operation Paperclip. Hell, some of them were even tried at the Nuremberg trials.

Hitler today is portrayed as an evil dictator that wanted to eliminate one group of people.

It may be a lie. It is impossible to know his real motivations for anything. He did what he was told to do by his handlers. But he absolutely pushed a ton of rhetoric to that effect. I suggest he didn't really want that to happen. Indeed, what he really wanted to happen was exactly what did happen (the creation of the State of Israel) but the rhetoric to that effect is everywhere in the primary sources.

I would suggest reading a few books that Henry Ford wrote.

I have. He, like the Nazi rhetoric, makes the exact same assocciation fallacy. He blames "the Jews" when in fact it was a very, very small subset of them that were running the show. The rest of the Jews were victims of the few that sat at the top of that ethnic group. Just like American's are victims of their own "1%" (I suggest it is actually far less than 1%, but the number has meaning to most, so it is sufficient).

Then dig around and watch a few of Hitler's speeches because they are pretty powerful.

I agree. You should also read Mein Kampf, as well as other works by Goebbels and other top Nazis. There is a lot of good evidence to be found in there. They all make that same association fallacy in their rhetoric however, blaming the larger group for the ministrations of a handful of the most rich and powerful.

The same people who controlled so much then still control so much now and these are the true vermin we need to eliminate

Yup. A small handful of people, not all of whom are of that specific ethnicity. They hide behind the larger group however, which allows for people to see the wrong enemy.

History is always written by the victors

Meh, sorta. History is written by the publishers. The publishers just so happen to be the exact same people as "the victors," but the people that write history are automatically the victors, because they control both sides of each and every war for at least the past 250 years.

The question is this, was Hitler truly evil?

Yes.

If you say yes, keep digging. If you say no, keep digging.

I will, because I always will, but I don't need to to elaborate sufficient for this discussion.

Hitler was just a front man. He didn't really do anything but be a front man. He was a Cabal agent, and as such he did a lot of very evil things.

there is not one historical document that supports the biggest atrocity he is accused

Just because it is unlikely that "six million Jews were killed in gas chambers" doesn't mean there weren't a ton of other atrocities committed by him and other Nazis. One of the things the "holocaust" narrative does is hide the other evil shit. Because the evidence for it is weak, it also helps create a controlled opposition narrative which itself helps to further hide the real actions of the Nazis and their real purpose.

there is a ton of evidence that proves that WW2 was a complete lie and the propaganda machine

Yes it was. WWII was controlled, 100% on both sides by the exact same entity sitting at the top, pulling the strings of everyone. Like a game of chess, being played by one person.

One of the primary purposes of WWII (and WWI for that matter) was to push the Jews into Palestine to create the State of Israel to fulfil prophecy. Hitler was working for the Jews (or rather, a few very rich people who called themselves Jews). Hitler was nothing but the frontman for that endeavor. The rhetoric that he pushed about "the Jews" was mostly true, which is why it is easy to make people think:

we were fighting the wrong side

The problem with that idea is that it wasn't "the Jews" that were doing those things that the Nazi propaganda machine was pushing, it was a few very rich people who called themselves Jews. It is an association fallacy. An intentional one, designed specifically to create an environment which would make any Jew living in Europe feel the need to leave. It is thus with this impetus, and economic and immigration policies put into place all across the world that helped facilitate a mass Jewish exodus from Europe to Palestine. Indeed, this endeavor pushed 3 million Jews into Palestine, something they had been trying to do for almost a hundred years prior to WWII. Hitler and the Nazis ensured the creation of the State of Israel in a thousand ways.

Oh, and btw, Hitler was a Jew (a quarter Jew). So were many of his generals and scientists and army, etc. There were top level Jewish Nazis all the way through the war. Some of these half Jews/quarter Jews remained Nazis all the way up until they moved to America. Hell, some of them were even tried at the Nuremberg trials.

Hitler today is portrayed as an evil dictator that wanted to eliminate one group of people.

It may be a lie. It is impossible to know his real motivations for anything. He did what he was told to do by his handlers. But he absolutely pushed a ton of rhetoric to that effect. I suggest he didn't really want that to happen. Indeed, what he really wanted to happen was exactly what did happen (the creation of the State of Israel) but the rhetoric to that effect is everywhere in the primary sources.

I would suggest reading a few books that Henry Ford wrote.

I have. He, like the Nazi rhetoric, makes the exact same assocciation fallacy. He blames "the Jews" when in fact it was a very, very small subset of them that were running the show. The rest of the Jews were victims of the few that sat at the top of that ethnic group. Just like American's are victims of their own "1%" (I suggest it is actually far less than 1%, but the number has meaning to most, so it is sufficient).

Then dig around and watch a few of Hitler's speeches because they are pretty powerful.

I agree. You should also read Mein Kampf, as well as other works by Goebbels and other top Nazis. There is a lot of good evidence to be found in there. They all make that same association fallacy in their rhetoric however, blaming the larger group for the ministrations of a handful of the most rich and powerful.

The same people who controlled so much then still control so much now and these are the true vermin we need to eliminate

Yup. A small handful of people, not all of whom are of that specific ethnicity. They hide behind the larger group however, which allows for people to see the wrong enemy.

History is always written by the victors

Meh, sorta. History is written by the publishers. The publishers just so happen to be the exact same people as "the victors," but the people that write history are automatically the victors, because they control both sides of each and every war for at least the past 250 years.

The question is this, was Hitler truly evil?

Yes.

If you say yes, keep digging. If you say no, keep digging.

I will, because I always will, but I don't need to to elaborate sufficient for this discussion.

Hitler was just a front man. He didn't really do anything but be a front man. He was a Cabal agent, and as such he did a lot of very evil things.

there is not one historical document that supports the biggest atrocity he is accused

Just because it is unlikely that "six million Jews were killed in gas chambers" doesn't mean there weren't a ton of other atrocities committed by him and other Nazis. One of the things the "holocaust" narrative does is hide the other evil shit. Because the evidence for it is weak, it also helps create a controlled opposition narrative which itself helps to further hide the real actions of the Nazis and their real purpose.

there is a ton of evidence that proves that WW2 was a complete lie and the propaganda machine

Yes it was. WWII was controlled, 100% on both sides by the exact same entity sitting at the top, pulling the strings of everyone. Like a game of chess, being played by one person.

One of the primary purposes of WWII (and WWI for that matter) was to push the Jews into Palestine to create the State of Israel to fulfil prophecy. Hitler was working for the Jews (or rather, a few very rich people who called themselves Jews). Hitler was nothing but the frontman for that endeavor. The rhetoric that he pushed about "the Jews" was mostly true, which is why it is easy to make people think:

we were fighting the wrong side

The problem with that idea is that it wasn't "the Jews" that were doing those things that the Nazi propaganda machine was pushing, it was a few very rich people who called themselves Jews. It is an association fallacy. An intentional one, designed specifically to create an environment which would make any Jew living in Europe feel the need to leave. It is thus with this impetus, and economic and immigration policies put into place all across the world that helped facilitate a mass Jewish exodus from Europe to Palestine. Indeed, this endeavor pushed 3 million Jews into Palestine, something they had been trying to do for almost a hundred years prior to WWII. Hitler and the Nazis ensured the creation of the State of Israel in a thousand ways.

Oh, and btw, Hitler was a Jew (a quarter Jew). So were many of his generals and scientists and army, etc. They were all the way through the war. Some of these half Jews/quarter Jews remained Nazis all the way up until they moved to America. Hell, some of them were even tried at the Nuremberg trials.

Hitler today is portrayed as an evil dictator that wanted to eliminate one group of people.

It may be a lie. It is impossible to know his real motivations for anything. He did what he was told to do by his handlers. But he absolutely pushed a ton of rhetoric to that effect. I suggest he didn't really want that to happen. Indeed, what he really wanted to happen was exactly what did happen (the creation of the State of Israel) but the rhetoric to that effect is everywhere in the primary sources.

I would suggest reading a few books that Henry Ford wrote.

I have. He, like the Nazi rhetoric, makes the exact same assocciation fallacy. He blames "the Jews" when in fact it was a very, very small subset of them that were running the show. The rest of the Jews were victims of the few that sat at the top of that ethnic group. Just like American's are victims of their own "1%" (I suggest it is actually far less than 1%, but the number has meaning to most, so it is sufficient).

Then dig around and watch a few of Hitler's speeches because they are pretty powerful.

I agree. You should also read Mein Kampf, as well as other works by Goebbels and other top Nazis. There is a lot of good evidence to be found in there. They all make that same association fallacy in their rhetoric however, blaming the larger group for the ministrations of a handful of the most rich and powerful.

The same people who controlled so much then still control so much now and these are the true vermin we need to eliminate

Yup. A small handful of people, not all of whom are of that specific ethnicity. They hide behind the larger group however, which allows for people to see the wrong enemy.

History is always written by the victors

Meh, sorta. History is written by the publishers. The publishers just so happen to be the exact same people as "the victors," but the people that write history are automatically the victors, because they control both sides of each and every war for at least the past 250 years.

The question is this, was Hitler truly evil?

Yes.

If you say yes, keep digging. If you say no, keep digging.

I will, because I always will, but I don't need to to elaborate sufficient for this discussion.

Hitler was just a front man. He didn't really do anything but be a front man. He was a Cabal agent, and as such he did a lot of very evil things.

there is not one historical document that supports the biggest atrocity he is accused

Just because it is unlikely that "six million Jews were killed in gas chambers" doesn't mean there weren't a ton of other atrocities committed by him and other Nazis. One of the things the "holocaust" narrative does is hide the other evil shit. Because the evidence for it is weak, it also helps create a controlled opposition narrative which itself helps to further hide the real actions of the Nazis and their real purpose.

there is a ton of evidence that proves that WW2 was a complete lie and the propaganda machine

Yes it was. WWII was controlled, 100% on both sides by the exact same entity sitting at the top, pulling the strings of everyone. Like a game of chess, being played by one person.

One of the primary purposes of WWII (and WWI for that matter) was to push the Jews into Palestine to create the State of Israel to fulfil prophecy. Hitler was working for the Jews (or rather, a few very rich people who called themselves Jews). Hitler was nothing but the frontman for that endeavor. The rhetoric that he pushed about "the Jews" was mostly true, which is why it is easy to make people think:

we were fighting the wrong side

The problem with that idea is that it wasn't "the Jews" that were doing those things that the Nazi propaganda machine was pushing, it was a few very rich people who called themselves Jews. It is an association fallacy. An intentional one, designed specifically to create an environment which would make any Jew living in Europe feel the need to leave. It is thus with this impetus, and economic policies put into place to help facilitate a move to Palestine. Indeed, this endeavor pushed 3 million Jews into Palestine, something they had been trying to do for almost a hundred years prior to WWII. Hitler and the Nazis ensured the creation of the State of Israel in a thousand ways.

Oh, and btw, Hitler was a Jew (a quarter Jew). So were many of his generals and scientists and army, etc. They were all the way through the war. Some of these half Jews/quarter Jews remained Nazis all the way up until they moved to America. Hell, some of them were even tried at the Nuremberg trials.

Hitler today is portrayed as an evil dictator that wanted to eliminate one group of people.

It may be a lie. It is impossible to know his real motivations for anything. He did what he was told to do by his handlers. But he absolutely pushed a ton of rhetoric to that effect. I suggest he didn't really want that to happen. Indeed, what he really wanted to happen was exactly what did happen (the creation of the State of Israel) but the rhetoric to that effect is everywhere in the primary sources.

I would suggest reading a few books that Henry Ford wrote.

I have. He, like the Nazi rhetoric, makes the exact same assocciation fallacy. He blames "the Jews" when in fact it was a very, very small subset of them that were running the show. The rest of the Jews were victims of the few that sat at the top of that ethnic group. Just like American's are victims of their own "1%" (I suggest it is actually far less than 1%, but the number has meaning to most, so it is sufficient).

Then dig around and watch a few of Hitler's speeches because they are pretty powerful.

I agree. You should also read Mein Kampf, as well as other works by Goebbels and other top Nazis. There is a lot of good evidence to be found in there. They all make that same association fallacy in their rhetoric however, blaming the larger group for the ministrations of a handful of the most rich and powerful.

The same people who controlled so much then still control so much now and these are the true vermin we need to eliminate

Yup. A small handful of people, not all of whom are of that specific ethnicity. They hide behind the larger group however, which allows for people to see the wrong enemy.

History is always written by the victors

Meh, sorta. History is written by the publishers. The publishers just so happen to be the exact same people as "the victors," but the people that write history are automatically the victors, because they control both sides of each and every war for at least the past 250 years.

The question is this, was Hitler truly evil?

Yes.

If you say yes, keep digging. If you say no, keep digging.

I will, because I always will, but I don't need to to elaborate sufficient for this discussion.

Hitler was just a front man. He didn't really do anything but be a front man. He was a Cabal agent, and as such he did a lot of very evil things.

there is not one historical document that supports the biggest atrocity he is accused

Just because it is unlikely that "six million Jews were killed in gas chambers" doesn't mean there weren't a ton of other atrocities committed by him and other Nazis. One of the things the "holocaust" narrative does is hide the other evil shit. Because the evidence for it is weak, it also helps create a controlled opposition narrative which itself helps to further hide the real actions of the Nazis and their real purpose for those that recognize the fabrication of the holocaust.

there is a ton of evidence that proves that WW2 was a complete lie and the propaganda machine

Yes it was. WWII was controlled, 100% on both sides by the exact same entity sitting at the top, pulling the strings of everyone. Like a game of chess, being played by one person.

One of the primary purposes of WWII (and WWI for that matter) was to push the Jews into Palestine to create the State of Israel to fulfil prophecy. Hitler was working for the Jews (or rather, a few very rich people who called themselves Jews). Hitler was nothing but the frontman for that endeavor. The rhetoric that he pushed about "the Jews" was mostly true, which is why it is easy to make people think:

we were fighting the wrong side

The problem with that idea is that it wasn't "the Jews" that were doing those things that the Nazi propaganda machine was pushing, it was a few very rich people who called themselves Jews. It is an association fallacy. An intentional one, designed specifically to create an environment which would make any Jew living in Europe feel the need to leave. It is thus with this impetus, and economic policies put into place to help facilitate a move to Palestine. Indeed, this endeavor pushed 3 million Jews into Palestine, something they had been trying to do for almost a hundred years prior to WWII. Hitler and the Nazis ensured the creation of the State of Israel in a thousand ways.

Oh, and btw, Hitler was a Jew (a quarter Jew). So were many of his generals and scientists and army, etc. They were all the way through the war. Some of these half Jews/quarter Jews remained Nazis all the way up until they moved to America. Hell, some of them were even tried at the Nuremberg trials.

Hitler today is portrayed as an evil dictator that wanted to eliminate one group of people.

It may be a lie. It is impossible to know his real motivations for anything. He did what he was told to do by his handlers. But he absolutely pushed a ton of rhetoric to that effect. I suggest he didn't really want that to happen. Indeed, what he really wanted to happen was exactly what did happen (the creation of the State of Israel) but the rhetoric to that effect is everywhere in the primary sources.

I would suggest reading a few books that Henry Ford wrote.

I have. He, like the Nazi rhetoric, makes the exact same assocciation fallacy. He blames "the Jews" when in fact it was a very, very small subset of them that were running the show. The rest of the Jews were victims of the few that sat at the top of that ethnic group. Just like American's are victims of their own "1%" (I suggest it is actually far less than 1%, but the number has meaning to most, so it is sufficient).

Then dig around and watch a few of Hitler's speeches because they are pretty powerful.

I agree. You should also read Mein Kampf, as well as other works by Goebbels and other top Nazis. There is a lot of good evidence to be found in there. They all make that same association fallacy in their rhetoric however, blaming the larger group for the ministrations of a handful of the most rich and powerful.

The same people who controlled so much then still control so much now and these are the true vermin we need to eliminate

Yup. A small handful of people, not all of whom are of that specific ethnicity. They hide behind the larger group however, which allows for people to see the wrong enemy.

History is always written by the victors

Meh, sorta. History is written by the publishers. The publishers just so happen to be the exact same people as "the victors," but the people that write history are automatically the victors, because they control both sides of each and every war for at least the past 250 years.

The question is this, was Hitler truly evil?

Yes.

If you say yes, keep digging. If you say no, keep digging.

I will, because I always will, but I don't need to to elaborate sufficient for this discussion.

Hitler was just a front man. He didn't really do anything but be a front man. He was a Cabal agent, and as such he did a lot of very evil things.

there is not one historical document that supports the biggest atrocity he is accused

Just because it is unlikely that "six million Jews were killed in gas chambers" doesn't mean there weren't a ton of other atrocities committed by him and other Nazis. One of the things the "holocaust" narrative does is hide the other evil shit. It also helps create a controlled opposition narrative, which it seems you espouse.

there is a ton of evidence that proves that WW2 was a complete lie and the propaganda machine

Yes it was. WWII was controlled, 100% on both sides by the exact same entity sitting at the top, pulling the strings of everyone. Like a game of chess, being played by one person.

One of the primary purposes of WWII (and WWI for that matter) was to push the Jews into Palestine to create the State of Israel to fulfil prophecy. Hitler was working for the Jews (or rather, a few very rich people who called themselves Jews). Hitler was nothing but the frontman for that endeavor. The rhetoric that he pushed about "the Jews" was mostly true, which is why it is easy to make people think:

we were fighting the wrong side

The problem with that idea is that it wasn't "the Jews" that were doing those things that the Nazi propaganda machine was pushing, it was a few very rich people who called themselves Jews. It is an association fallacy. An intentional one, designed specifically to create an environment which would make any Jew living in Europe feel the need to leave. It is thus with this impetus, and economic policies put into place to help facilitate a move to Palestine. Indeed, this endeavor pushed 3 million Jews into Palestine, something they had been trying to do for almost a hundred years prior to WWII. Hitler and the Nazis ensured the creation of the State of Israel in a thousand ways.

Oh, and btw, Hitler was a Jew (a quarter Jew). So were many of his generals and scientists and army, etc. They were all the way through the war. Some of these half Jews/quarter Jews remained Nazis all the way up until they moved to America. Hell, some of them were even tried at the Nuremberg trials.

Hitler today is portrayed as an evil dictator that wanted to eliminate one group of people.

It may be a lie. It is impossible to know his real motivations for anything. He did what he was told to do by his handlers. But he absolutely pushed a ton of rhetoric to that effect. I suggest he didn't really want that to happen. Indeed, what he really wanted to happen was exactly what did happen (the creation of the State of Israel) but the rhetoric to that effect is everywhere in the primary sources.

I would suggest reading a few books that Henry Ford wrote.

I have. He, like the Nazi rhetoric, makes the exact same assocciation fallacy. He blames "the Jews" when in fact it was a very, very small subset of them that were running the show. The rest of the Jews were victims of the few that sat at the top of that ethnic group. Just like American's are victims of their own "1%" (I suggest it is actually far less than 1%, but the number has meaning to most, so it is sufficient).

Then dig around and watch a few of Hitler's speeches because they are pretty powerful.

I agree. You should also read Mein Kampf, as well as other works by Goebbels and other top Nazis. There is a lot of good evidence to be found in there. They all make that same association fallacy in their rhetoric however, blaming the larger group for the ministrations of a handful of the most rich and powerful.

The same people who controlled so much then still control so much now and these are the true vermin we need to eliminate

Yup. A small handful of people, not all of whom are of that specific ethnicity. They hide behind the larger group however, which allows for people to see the wrong enemy.

History is always written by the victors

Meh, sorta. History is written by the publishers. The publishers just so happen to be the exact same people as "the victors," but the people that write history are automatically the victors, because they control both sides of each and every war for at least the past 250 years.