So Jeremiah was talking out of his ass when he said that the pantheon of pagan gods shouldn't be worshiped?

I don't know. Why don't you ask Jeremiah what his motives were? Oh, that's right, you can't, because at best he has been dead for millennia and at worst he never existed. The people who wrote every book in the OT belonged to an aristocratic Priest Class who ruled the tribes of the region. No one doubts that. We know which group of people wrote the OT because it's written in the bible, and all of the archeological evidence supports it. It was a Priest Class that sat at the top of society. For their writing efforts they got a tenth of everyone's income, all the best cuts of meat, and the underclass's first born as temple slaves or for sacrifice (or a cash payment if you could afford it). THAT is who wrote the entire OT.

They also happen to be the same people who rule the world today.

Maybe the reason they pushed a fundamental change in doctrine has something to do with the result of their efforts?

Moses was a fabrication created after the Babylonian Captivity?

Moses was probably someone, but probably not the person you think he was. At the least, the oldest books (that we have found) that describe the stories you believe are the absolute truth about him were written at least a thousand years (oldest texts) after he lived. The versions you believe in (which are different than those oldest texts (DSS) in some key ways) were written 2500 years or so after Moses. There is substantial evidence of changes in the texts.

The sheer number of new testament manuscripts are greater than any other document from antiquity.

Even there, there are substantial discrepancies in the texts found. There is substantial evidence of edits over the years. There are more books left out than included in the version you believe is "the whole truth" and almost the entire present day Christian dogma doesn't come from the words of Jesus, but from the narrative and interpretation of Saul the mass murdering Pharisee agent. All he had to do was give some story about "I met Jesus and changed my mind" and everyone believes it and allows his interpretations to literally rule the world.

That's what actually happened. None of those statements are controversial. The present day Christian dogma requires changing the evidence to fit the beliefs. It has Cabal fingerprints all over every step and people ignore all the evidence.

So Jeremiah was talking out of his ass when he said that the pantheon of pagan gods shouldn't be worshiped?

I don't know. Why don't you ask Jeremiah what his motives were? Oh, that's right, you can't, because at best he has been dead for millennia and at worst he never existed. The people who wrote every book in the OT belonged to an aristocratic Priest Class who ruled the tribes of the region. No one doubts that. We know which group of people wrote the OT because it's written the bible, and all of the archeological evidence supports it. It was a Priest Class that sat at the top of society. For their writing efforts they got a tenth of everyone's income, all the best cuts of meat, and the underclass's first born as temple slaves or for sacrifice (or a cash payment if you could afford it). THAT is who wrote the entire OT.

They also happen to be the same people who rule the world today.

Maybe the reason they pushed a fundamental change in doctrine has something to do with the result of their efforts?

Moses was a fabrication created after the Babylonian Captivity?

Moses was probably someone, but probably not the person you think he was. At the least, the oldest books (that we have found) that describe the stories you believe are the absolute truth about him were written at least a thousand years (oldest texts) after he lived. The versions you believe in (which are different than those oldest texts (DSS) in some key ways) were written 2500 years or so after Moses. There is substantial evidence of changes in the texts.

The sheer number of new testament manuscripts are greater than any other document from antiquity.

Even there, there are substantial discrepancies in the texts found. There is substantial evidence of edits over the years. There are more books left out than included in the version you believe is "the whole truth" and almost the entire present day Christian dogma doesn't come from the words of Jesus, but from the narrative and interpretation of Saul the mass murdering Pharisee agent. All he had to do was give some story about "I met Jesus and changed my mind" and everyone believes it and allows his interpretations to literally rule the world.

That's what actually happened. None of those statements are controversial. The present day Christian dogma requires changing the evidence to fit the beliefs. It has Cabal fingerprints all over every step and people ignore all the evidence.

So Jeremiah was talking out of his ass when he said that the pantheon of pagan gods shouldn't be worshiped?

I don't know. Why don't you ask Jeremiah what his motives were? Oh, that's right, you can't, because at best he has been dead for millennia and at worst he never existed. The people who wrote every book in the OT belonged to an aristocratic Priest Class who ruled the tribes of the region. No one doubts that. We know which group of people wrote the OT because it's written the bible, and all of the archeological evidence supports it. It was a Priest Class that sat at the top of society. For their writing efforts they got a tenth of everyone's income, all the best cuts of meat, and the underclass's first born as temple slaves or for sacrifice (or a cash payment if you could afford it). THAT is who wrote the entire OT.

They also happen to be the same people who rule the world today.

Maybe the reason they pushed a fundamental change in doctrine has something to do with the result of their efforts?

Moses was a fabrication created after the Babylonian Captivity?

Moses was probably someone, but probably not the person you think he was. At the least, the oldest books (that we have found) that describe the stories you believe are the absolute truth about him were written at least a thousand years (oldest texts) after he lived. The versions you believe in (which are different than the DSS in some key ways) were written (oldest version) 2500 years or so after Moses. There is substantial evidence of changes in the texts.

The sheer number of new testament manuscripts are greater than any other document from antiquity.

Even there, there are substantial discrepancies in the texts found. There is substantial evidence of edits over the years. There are more books left out than included in the version you believe is "the whole truth" and almost the entire present day Christian dogma doesn't come from the words of Jesus, but from the narrative and interpretation of Saul the mass murdering Pharisee agent. All he had to do was give some story about "I met Jesus and changed my mind" and everyone believes it and allows his interpretations to literally rule the world.

That's what actually happened. None of those statements are controversial. The present day Christian dogma requires changing the evidence to fit the beliefs. It has Cabal fingerprints all over every step and people ignore all the evidence.

So Jeremiah was talking out of his ass when he said that the pantheon of pagan gods shouldn't be worshiped?

I don't know. Why don't you ask Jeremiah what his motives were? Oh, that's right, you can't, because at best he has been dead for millennia and at worst he never existed. The people who wrote every book in the OT belonged to an aristocratic Priest Class who ruled the tribes of the region. No one doubts that. We know which group of people wrote the OT because it's written the bible, and all of the archeological evidence supports it. It was a Priest Class that sat at the top of society. For their writing efforts they got a tenth of everyone's income, all the best cuts of meat, and their first born as temple slaves or for sacrifice (or a cash payment if you could afford it). THAT is who wrote the entire OT.

They also happen to be the same people who rule the world today.

Maybe the reason they pushed a fundamental change in doctrine has something to do with the result of their efforts?

Moses was a fabrication created after the Babylonian Captivity?

Moses was probably someone, but probably not the person you think he was. At the least, the oldest books (that we have found) that describe the stories you believe are the absolute truth about him were written at least a thousand years (oldest texts) after he lived. The versions you believe in (which are different than the DSS in some key ways) were written (oldest version) 2500 years or so after Moses. There is substantial evidence of changes in the texts.

The sheer number of new testament manuscripts are greater than any other document from antiquity.

Even there, there are substantial discrepancies in the texts found. There is substantial evidence of edits over the years. There are more books left out than included in the version you believe is "the whole truth" and almost the entire present day Christian dogma doesn't come from the words of Jesus, but from the narrative and interpretation of Saul the mass murdering Pharisee agent. All he had to do was give some story about "I met Jesus and changed my mind" and everyone believes it and allows his interpretations to literally rule the world.

That's what actually happened. None of those statements are controversial. The present day Christian dogma requires changing the evidence to fit the beliefs. It has Cabal fingerprints all over every step and people ignore all the evidence.

So Jeremiah was talking out of his ass when he said that the pantheon of pagan gods shouldn't be worshiped?

I don't know. Why don't you ask Jeremiah what his motives were? Oh, that's right, you can't, because at best he has been dead for millennia and at worst he never existed. The people who wrote every book in the OT belonged to an aristocratic Priest Class who ruled the tribes of the region. No one doubts that. We know which group of people wrote the OT because it's written the bible, and all of the archeological evidence supports it. It was a Priest Class that sat at the top of society, and got a tenth of everyone's income, all the best cuts of meat, and their first born as temple slaves or for sacrifice (or a cash payment if you could afford it). THAT is who wrote the entire OT.

They also happen to be the same people who rule the world today.

Maybe the reason they pushed a fundamental change in doctrine has something to do with the result of their efforts?

Moses was a fabrication created after the Babylonian Captivity?

Moses was probably someone, but probably not the person you think he was. At the least, the oldest books (that we have found) that describe the stories you believe are the absolute truth about him were written at least a thousand years (oldest texts) after he lived. The versions you believe in (which are different than the DSS in some key ways) were written (oldest version) 2500 years or so after Moses. There is substantial evidence of changes in the texts.

The sheer number of new testament manuscripts are greater than any other document from antiquity.

Even there, there are substantial discrepancies in the texts found. There is substantial evidence of edits over the years. There are more books left out than included in the version you believe is "the whole truth" and almost the entire present day Christian dogma doesn't come from the words of Jesus, but from the narrative and interpretation of Saul the mass murdering Pharisee agent. All he had to do was give some story about "I met Jesus and changed my mind" and everyone believes it and allows his interpretations to literally rule the world.

That's what actually happened. None of those statements are controversial. The present day Christian dogma requires changing the evidence to fit the beliefs. It has Cabal fingerprints all over every step and people ignore all the evidence.

So Jeremiah was talking out of his ass when he said that the pantheon of pagan gods shouldn't be worshiped?

I don't know. Why don't you ask Jeremiah what his motives were? Oh, that's right, you can't, because at best he has been dead for millennia and at worst he never existed. The people who wrote every book in the OT belonged to an aristocratic Priest Class who ruled the tribes of the region. No one doubts that. We know which group of people wrote the OT. It was a Priest Class that sat at the top of society, and got a tenth of everyone's income, all the best cuts of meat, and their first born as temple slaves or for sacrifice (or a cash payment if you could afford it). THAT is who wrote the entire OT.

They also happen to be the same people who rule the world today.

Maybe the reason they pushed a fundamental change in doctrine has something to do with the result of their efforts?

Moses was a fabrication created after the Babylonian Captivity?

Moses was probably someone, but probably not the person you think he was. At the least, the oldest books (that we have found) that describe the stories you believe are the absolute truth about him were written at least a thousand years (oldest texts) after he lived. The versions you believe in (which are different than the DSS in some key ways) were written (oldest version) 2500 years or so after Moses. There is substantial evidence of changes in the texts.

The sheer number of new testament manuscripts are greater than any other document from antiquity.

Even there, there are substantial discrepancies in the texts found. There is substantial evidence of edits over the years. There are more books left out than included in the version you believe is "the whole truth" and almost the entire present day Christian dogma doesn't come from the words of Jesus, but from the narrative and interpretation of Saul the mass murdering Pharisee agent. All he had to do was give some story about "I met Jesus and changed my mind" and everyone believes it and allows his interpretations to literally rule the world.

That's what actually happened. None of those statements are controversial. The present day Christian dogma requires changing the evidence to fit the beliefs. It has Cabal fingerprints all over every step and people ignore all the evidence.

So Jeremiah was talking out of his ass when he said that the pantheon of pagan gods shouldn't be worshiped?

I don't know. Why don't you ask Jeremiah what his motives were? Oh, that's right, you can't, because at best he has been dead for millennia and at worst he never existed. The people who wrote every book in the OT belonged to an aristocratic Priest Class who ruled the tribes of the region. No one doubts that. We know which group of people wrote the OT. It was a Priest Class that sat at the top of society, and got a tenth of everyone's income, all the best cuts of meat, and their first born as temple slaves or for sacrifice (or a cash payment if you could afford it). THAT is who wrote the entire OT.

They also happen to be the same people who rule the world today.

Moses was a fabrication created after the Babylonian Captivity?

Moses was probably someone, but probably not the person you think he was. At the least, the oldest books (that we have found) that describe the stories you believe are the absolute truth about him were written at least a thousand years (oldest texts) after he lived. The versions you believe in (which are different than the DSS in some key ways) were written (oldest version) 2500 years or so after Moses. There is substantial evidence of changes in the texts.

The sheer number of new testament manuscripts are greater than any other document from antiquity.

Even there, there are substantial discrepancies in the texts found. There is substantial evidence of edits over the years. There are more books left out than included in the version you believe is "the whole truth" and almost the entire present day Christian dogma doesn't come from the words of Jesus, but from the narrative and interpretation of Saul the mass murdering Pharisee agent. All he had to do was give some story about "I met Jesus and changed my mind" and everyone believes it and allows his interpretations to literally rule the world.

That's what actually happened. None of those statements are controversial. The present day Christian dogma requires changing the evidence to fit the beliefs. It has Cabal fingerprints all over every step and people ignore all the evidence.

So Jeremiah was talking out of his ass when he said that the pantheon of pagan gods shouldn't be worshiped?

I don't know. Why don't you ask Jeremiah what his motives were? Oh, that's right, you can't, because at best he has been dead for millennia and at worst he never existed. The people who wrote every book in the OT belonged to an aristocratic Priest Class who ruled the tribes of the region. No one doubts that. We know which group of people wrote the OT. It was a Priest Class that sat at the top of society, and got a tenth of everyone's income, all the best cuts of meat, and their first born as temple slaves or for sacrifice (or a cash payment if you could afford it). THAT is who wrote the entire OT.

They also happen to be the same people who rule the world today.

Moses was a fabrication created after the Babylonian Captivity?

Moses was probably someone, but probably not the person you think he was. At the least, the oldest books (that we have found) that describe the stories you believe are the absolute truth about him were written at least a thousand years (oldest texts) after he lived. The versions you believe in (which are different than the DSS in some key ways) were written (oldest version) 2500 years or so after Moses. There is substantial evidence of changes in the texts.

The sheer number of new testament manuscripts are greater than any other document from antiquity.

Even there, there are substantial discrepancies in the texts found. There is substantial evidence of edits over the years. There are more books left out than included in the version you believe is "the whole truth" and almost the entire present day Christian dogma doesn't come from the words of Jesus, but from the narrative and interpretation of Saul the mass murdering Pharisee agent. All he had to do was give some story about "I met Jesus and changed my mind" and everyone believes it and allows his interpretations to literally rule the world.

That's what actually happened. None of those statements are controversial. The present day Christian dogma requires changing the evidence to fit the beliefs. It has Cabal fingerprints all over every step and ignore all the evidence.

So Jeremiah was talking out of his ass when he said that the pantheon of pagan gods shouldn't be worshiped?

I don't know. Why don't you ask Jeremiah what his motives were? Oh, that's right, you can't, because at best he has been dead for millennia and at worst he never existed. The people who wrote every book in the OT belonged to an aristocratic Priest Class who ruled the tribes of the region. No one doubts that. We know which group of people wrote the OT. It was a Priest Class that sat at the top of society, and got a tenth of everyone's income, all the best cuts of meat, and their first born as temple slaves or for sacrifice (or a cash payment if you could afford it). THAT is who wrote the entire OT.

They also happen to be the same people who rule the world today.

Moses was a fabrication created after the Babylonian Captivity?

Moses was probably someone, but probably not the person you think he was. At the least, the oldest books (that we have found) that describe the stories you believe are the absolute truth about him were written at least a thousand years (oldest texts) after he lived. The versions you believe in (which are different than the DSS in some key ways) were written (oldest version) 2500 years or so after Moses. There is substantial evidence of changes in the texts.

The sheer number of new testament manuscripts are greater than any other document from antiquity.

Even there, there are substantial discrepancies in the texts found. There is substantial evidence of edits over the years. There are more books left out than included in the version you believe is "the whole truth" and almost the entire present day Christian dogma doesn't come from the words of Jesus, but from the narrative and interpretation of Saul the mass murdering Pharisee agent. All he had to do was give some story about "I met Jesus and changed my mind" and everyone believes it and allows his interpretations to literally rule the world.

That's what actually happened. None of those statements are controversial. The present day Christian dogma requires changing the evidence to fit the beliefs. It has Cabal fingerprints all over every step and it is so hard for people to look at that.

So Jeremiah was talking out of his ass when he said that the pantheon of pagan gods shouldn't be worshiped?

I don't know. Why don't you ask Jeremiah what his motives were? Oh, that's right, you can't, because at best he has been dead for millennia and at worst he never existed. The people who wrote every book in the OT belonged to an aristocratic Priest Class who ruled the tribes of the region. No one doubts that. We know which group of people wrote the OT. It was a Priest Class that sat at the top of society, and got a tenth of everyone's income, all the best cuts of meat, and their first born as temple slaves or for sacrifice (or a cash payment if you could afford it). THAT is who wrote the entire OT.

They also happen to be the same people who rule the world today.

Moses was a fabrication created after the Babylonian Captivity?

Moses was probably someone, but probably not the person you think he was. At the least, the oldest books that describe the stories you believe are the absolute truth about him were written at least a thousand years (oldest texts) after he lived. The versions you believe in (which are different than the DSS in some key ways) were written (oldest version) 2500 years or so after Moses. There is substantial evidence of changes in the texts.

The sheer number of new testament manuscripts are greater than any other document from antiquity.

Even there, there are substantial discrepancies in the texts found. There is substantial evidence of edits over the years. There are more books left out than included in the version you believe is "the whole truth" and almost the entire present day Christian dogma doesn't come from the words of Jesus, but from the narrative and interpretation of Saul the mass murdering Pharisee agent. All he had to do was give some story about "I met Jesus and changed my mind" and everyone believes it and allows his interpretations to literally rule the world.

That's what actually happened. None of those statements are controversial. The present day Christian dogma requires changing the evidence to fit the beliefs. It has Cabal fingerprints all over every step and it is so hard for people to look at that.