Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

the overthrow of the Russian people was funded by Wall Street and London banker jews.

I was talking about the Russian people before the Communist Revolutions (the Czar and his government who enacted the Pogroms). They also were controlled by the same people (bankers). It was all a Play, a Show, from day one.

Hitler was not a Rothschild or Rockefeller puppet. He was fighting against them, which is why they wanted to take him down.

Hitler was absolutely a puppet. He was put into power and funded by both of those families from day one. Did he "rebel" in the end (around 1943)? I am most certainly not convinced of that. There is evidence that supports that, but as far as I can tell, everything played out exactly as intended. It is far more likely that he was playing a different part in the Controlled Opposition play than any actual "rebellion."

He arrested a Rothschild banker when Austria joined Germany.

This is not evidence of rebellion. This is evidence of creating a narrative. It MUST LOOK LIKE you are "against" for the Play to sell to the public. The truth is more likely that the "attacker" (the Nazis) is really just a paid agent acting in opposition. This happens all the time. Jessie Smollet is a modern day example of this, but this type of Controlled Opposition goes back forever.

As another prominent example, in 1914 there was an "assassination attempt" on Rockefeller by Alexander Berkman, who just so happens to have been the nephew and adopted son of Mark Natanson, who was basically the father of the Bolshevik Revolution. Mr. Berkman was BFFs with Margaret Sanger, Rose Parks Stokes, Emma Goldman, and about twenty other people (all members of the IWW) who are provably agents of Rockefeller and Rothschild. The only people who died in this "assassination attempt" were the low-level "incompetent" assassins who failed completely to do what they intended.

This act misdirected away from Rockefeller's complicity in the Ludlow Massacre, and also solidified the IWW as the "opposition" to the Rockefeller empire. All of the top level IWW members who stayed in America (about half went to Russia, see below) became, or already were Rockefellers top agents in other areas, both on "The Right" and "The Left." This act of assassination was a brilliant misdirection. People today still believe the IWW was "against the Corporations," rather than their acting agents in opposition.

This exact same group of people attempted another "assassination" on a bunch of top level people in American Corporations and Government (two different words for the same organization) in 1918, one of whom happened to be Rockefeller again. This resulted in the First Red Scare. The "perpetrators," like Mr. Berkman, Emma Goldman, and numerous other "Anarcho-Communists" were deported to the newly formed Soviet Russia where basically all of them took up high level positions in the new government. The only person who died in that "assassination attempt" was the low-level incompetent assassin.

This pattern repeats all the time. That we see it with Hitler is no surprise at all.

Importantly, no Rothschilds were harmed in the making of the WWII movie. Their “confiscated goods” were all returned to them. Believing that an act of “opposition” is as it appears on the surface does not understand how the world actually works at all.

Not all jews are involved in the fuckery, but to claim that the elite types are not jews is nonsense.

That is not what I said. I’m not sure where you got that from. If you are taking that from where I said, " who call themselves Jews," I say that about everyone who calls themselves Jews, because it is an important distinction from those who follow the same ideologies and have the same ancestry and do not call themselves Jews (aka Crypto-Jews).

 the Khazarians came from SOMEWHERE. That somewhere appears to be those same biblical jews, who migrated various places and ultimately landed in Khazaria.

I agree completely. What is not appreciated is that the Khazarians were a subgroup of the Scythians, AKA the Tartarians, and the Tartarians were wiped out of history to disconnect all the groups from each other (at least that is what I think the motive was). There is so much more to that story. Specifically, I think the Jews who infiltrated the Khazarians may have been the Magogians, the “lost tribe” of Israel.

132 days ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

the overthrow of the Russian people was funded by Wall Street and London banker jews.

I was talking about the Russian people before the Communist Revolutions (the Czar and his government who enacted the Pogroms). They also were controlled by the same people (bankers). It was all a Play, a Show, from day one.

Hitler was not a Rothschild or Rockefeller puppet. He was fighting against them, which is why they wanted to take him down.

Hitler was absolutely a puppet. He was put into power and funded by both of those families from day one. Did he "rebel" in the end (around 1943)? I am most certainly not convinced of that. There is evidence that supports that, but as far as I can tell, everything played out exactly as intended. It is far more likely that he was playing a different part in the Controlled Opposition play than any actual "rebellion."

He arrested a Rothschild banker when Austria joined Germany.

This is not evidence of rebellion. This is evidence of creating a narrative. It MUST LOOK LIKE you are "against" for the Play to sell to the public. The truth is more likely that the "attacker" (the Nazis) is really just a paid agent acting in opposition. This happens all the time. Jessie Smollet is a modern day example of this, but this type of Controlled Opposition goes back forever.

As another prominent example, in 1914 there was an "assassination attempt" on Rockefeller by Alexander Berkman, who just so happens to have been the nephew and adopted son of Mark Natanson, who was basically the father of the Bolshevik Revolution. Mr. Berkman was BFFs with Margaret Sanger, Rose Parks Stokes, Emma Goldman, and about twenty other people (all members of the IWW) who are provably agents of Rockefeller and Rothschild. The only people who died in this "assassination attempt" were the low-level "incompetent" assassins who failed completely to do what they intended.

This act misdirected away from Rockefeller's complicity in the Ludlow Massacre, and also solidified the IWW as the "opposition" to the Rockefeller empire. All of the top level IWW members who stayed in America (about half went to Russia, see below) became, or already were Rockefellers top agents in other areas, both on "The Right" and "The Left." This act of assassination was a brilliant misdirection. People today still believe the IWW was "against the Corporations," rather than their acting agents in opposition.

This exact same group of people attempted another "assassination" on a bunch of top level people in American Corporations and Government (two different words for the same organization) in 1918, one of whom happened to be Rockefeller again. This resulted in the First Red Scare. The "perpetrators," like Mr. Berkman, Emma Goldman, and numerous other "Anarcho-Communists" were deported to the newly formed Soviet Russia where basically all of them took up high level positions in the new government. The only person who died in that "assassination attempt" was the low-level incompetent assassin.

This pattern repeats all the time. That we see it with Hitler is no surprise at all.

Importantly, no Rothschilds were harmed in the making of the WWII movie. Their “confiscated goods” were all returned to them. Believing that an act of “opposition” is as it appears on the surface does not understand how the world actually works at all.

Not all jews are involved in the fuckery, but to claim that the elite types are not jews is nonsense.

That is not what I said. I’m not sure where you got that from. If you are taking that from where I said, " who call themselves Jews," I say that about everyone who calls themselves Jews, because it is an important distinction from those who follow the same ideologies and have the same ancestry and do not call themselves Jews (aka Crypto-Jews).

 the Khazarians came from SOMEWHERE. That somewhere appears to be those same biblical jews, who migrated various places and ultimately landed in Khazaria.

I agree completely. What is not appreciated is that the Khazarians were the Scythians, AKA the Tartarians, and the Tartarians were wiped out of history to disconnect all the groups from each other (at least that is what I think the motive was). There is so much more to that story. Specifically, I think the Jews who infiltrated the Khazarians may have been the Magogians, the “lost tribe” of Israel.

132 days ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

the overthrow of the Russian people was funded by Wall Street and London banker jews.

I was talking about the Russian people before the Communist Revolutions (the Czar and his government who enacted the Pogroms). They also were controlled by the same people (bankers). It was all a Play, a Show, from day one.

Hitler was not a Rothschild or Rockefeller puppet. He was fighting against them, which is why they wanted to take him down.

Hitler was absolutely a puppet. He was put into power and funded by both of those families from day one. Did he "rebel" in the end (around 1943)? I am most certainly not convinced of that. There is evidence that supports that, but as far as I can tell, everything played out exactly as intended. It is far more likely that he was playing a different part in the Controlled Opposition play than any actual "rebellion."

He arrested a Rothschild banker when Austria joined Germany.

This is not evidence of rebellion. This is evidence of creating a narrative. It MUST LOOK LIKE you are "against" for the Play to sell to the public. The truth is more likely that the "attacker" (the Nazis) is really just a paid agent acting in opposition. This happens all the time. Jessie Smollet is a modern day example of this, but this type of Controlled Opposition goes back forever.

As another prominent example, in 1914 there was an "assassination attempt" on Rockefeller by Alexander Berkman, who just so happens to have been the nephew and adopted son of Mark Natanson, who was basically the father of the Bolshevik Revolution. Mr. Berkman was BFFs with Margaret Sanger, Rose Parks Stokes, Emma Goldman, and about twenty other people (all members of the IWW) who are provably agents of Rockefeller and Rothschild. The only people who died in this "assassination attempt" were the low-level "incompetent" assassins who failed completely to do what they intended.

This act misdirected away from Rockefeller's complicity in the Ludlow Massacre, and also solidified the IWW as the "opposition" to the Rockefeller empire. All of the top level IWW members who stayed in America (about half went to Russia, see below) were Rockefellers top agents in other areas, both on "The Right" and "The Left." This act of assassination was a brilliant misdirection. People today still believe the IWW was "against the Corporations," rather than their acting agents in opposition.

This exact same group of people attempted another "assassination" on a bunch of top level people in American Corporations and Government (two different words for the same organization) in 1918, one of whom happened to be Rockefeller again. This resulted in the First Red Scare. The "perpetrators," like Mr. Berkman, Emma Goldman, and numerous other "Anarcho-Communists" were deported to the newly formed Soviet Russia where basically all of them took up high level positions in the new government. The only person who died in that "assassination attempt" was the low-level incompetent assassin.

This pattern repeats all the time. That we see it with Hitler is no surprise at all.

Importantly, no Rothschilds were harmed in the making of the WWII movie. Their “confiscated goods” were all returned to them. Believing that an act of “opposition” is as it appears on the surface does not understand how the world actually works at all.

Not all jews are involved in the fuckery, but to claim that the elite types are not jews is nonsense.

That is not what I said. I’m not sure where you got that from. If you are taking that from where I said, " who call themselves Jews," I say that about everyone who calls themselves Jews, because it is an important distinction from those who follow the same ideologies and have the same ancestry and do not call themselves Jews (aka Crypto-Jews).

 the Khazarians came from SOMEWHERE. That somewhere appears to be those same biblical jews, who migrated various places and ultimately landed in Khazaria.

I agree completely. What is not appreciated is that the Khazarians were the Scythians, AKA the Tartarians, and the Tartarians were wiped out of history to disconnect all the groups from each other (at least that is what I think the motive was). There is so much more to that story. Specifically, I think the Jews who infiltrated the Khazarians may have been the Magogians, the “lost tribe” of Israel.

132 days ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

the overthrow of the Russian people was funded by Wall Street and London banker jews.

I was talking about the Russian people before the Communist Revolutions (the Czar and his government who enacted the Pogroms). They also were controlled by the same people (bankers). It was all a Play, a Show, from day one.

Hitler was not a Rothschild or Rockefeller puppet. He was fighting against them, which is why they wanted to take him down.

Hitler was absolutely a puppet. He was put into power and funded by both of those families from day one. Did he "rebel" in the end (around 1943)? I am most certainly not convinced of that. There is evidence that supports that, but as far as I can tell, everything played out exactly as intended. It is far more likely that he was playing a different part in the Controlled Opposition play than any actual "rebellion."

He arrested a Rothschild banker when Austria joined Germany.

This is not evidence of rebellion. This is evidence of creating a narrative. It MUST LOOK LIKE you are "against" for the Play to sell to the public. The truth is more likely that the "attacker" (the Nazis) is really just a paid agent. This happens all the time. Jessie Smollet is a modern day example of this, but this type of Controlled Opposition goes back forever.

As another prominent example, in 1914 there was an "assassination attempt" on Rockefeller by Alexander Berkman, who just so happens to have been the nephew and adopted son of Mark Natanson, who was basically the father of the Bolshevik Revolution. Mr. Berkman was BFFs with Margaret Sanger, Rose Parks Stokes, Emma Goldman, and about twenty other people (all members of the IWW) who are provably agents of Rockefeller and Rothschild. The only people who died in this "assassination attempt" were the low-level "incompetent" assassins who failed completely to do what they intended.

This act misdirected away from Rockefeller's complicity in the Ludlow Massacre, and also solidified the IWW as the "opposition" to the Rockefeller empire. All of the top level IWW members who stayed in America (about half went to Russia, see below) were Rockefellers top agents in other areas, both on "The Right" and "The Left." This act of assassination was a brilliant misdirection. People today still believe the IWW was "against the Corporations," rather than their acting agents in opposition.

This exact same group of people attempted another "assassination" on a bunch of top level people in American Corporations and Government (two different words for the same organization) in 1918, one of whom happened to be Rockefeller again. This resulted in the First Red Scare. The "perpetrators," like Mr. Berkman, Emma Goldman, and numerous other "Anarcho-Communists" were deported to the newly formed Soviet Russia where basically all of them took up high level positions in the new government. The only person who died in that "assassination attempt" was the low-level incompetent assassin.

This pattern repeats all the time. That we see it with Hitler is no surprise at all.

Importantly, no Rothschilds were harmed in the making of the WWII movie. Their “confiscated goods” were all returned to them. Believing that an act of “opposition” is as it appears on the surface does not understand how the world actually works at all.

Not all jews are involved in the fuckery, but to claim that the elite types are not jews is nonsense.

That is not what I said. I’m not sure where you got that from. If you are taking that from where I said, " who call themselves Jews," I say that about everyone who calls themselves Jews, because it is an important distinction from those who follow the same ideologies and have the same ancestry and do not call themselves Jews (aka Crypto-Jews).

 the Khazarians came from SOMEWHERE. That somewhere appears to be those same biblical jews, who migrated various places and ultimately landed in Khazaria.

I agree completely. What is not appreciated is that the Khazarians were the Scythians, AKA the Tartarians, and the Tartarians were wiped out of history to disconnect all the groups from each other (at least that is what I think the motive was). There is so much more to that story. Specifically, I think the Jews who infiltrated the Khazarians may have been the Magogians, the “lost tribe” of Israel.

132 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

the overthrow of the Russian people was funded by Wall Street and London banker jews.

I was talking about the Russian people before the Communist Revolutions (the Czar and his government who enacted the Pogroms). They also were controlled by the same people (bankers). It was all a Play, a Show, from day one.

Hitler was not a Rothschild or Rockefeller puppet. He was fighting against them, which is why they wanted to take him down.

Hitler was absolutely a puppet. He was put into power and funded by both of those families from day one. Did he "rebel" in the end (around 1943)? I am most certainly not convinced of that. There is evidence that supports that, but as far as I can tell, everything played out exactly as intended. It is far more likely that he was playing a different part in the Controlled Opposition play than any actual "rebellion."

He arrested a Rothschild banker when Austria joined Germany.

This is not evidence of rebellion. This is evidence of creating a narrative. It MUST LOOK LIKE you are "against" for the Play to sell to the public. This plays out like this all the time. Jessie Smollet is a modern day example of this, but this type of Controlled Opposition goes back forever.

As another prominent example, in 1914 there was an "assassination attempt" on Rockefeller by Alexander Berkman, who just so happens to have been the nephew and adopted son of Mark Natanson, who was basically the father of the Bolshevik Revolution. Mr. Berkman was BFFs with Margaret Sanger, Rose Parks Stokes, Emma Goldman, and about twenty other people (all members of the IWW) who are provably agents of Rockefeller and Rothschild. The only people who died in this "assassination attempt" were the low-level "incompetent" assassins who failed completely to do what they intended.

This act misdirected away from Rockefeller's complicity in the Ludlow Massacre, and also solidified the IWW as the "opposition" to the Rockefeller empire. All of the top level IWW members who stayed in America (about half went to Russia, see below) were Rockefellers top agents in other areas, both on "The Right" and "The Left." This act of assassination was a brilliant misdirection. People today still believe the IWW was "against the Corporations," rather than their acting agents in opposition.

This exact same group of people attempted another "assassination" on a bunch of top level people in American Corporations and Government (two different words for the same organization) in 1918, one of whom happened to be Rockefeller again. This resulted in the First Red Scare. The "perpetrators," like Mr. Berkman, Emma Goldman, and numerous other "Anarcho-Communists" were deported to the newly formed Soviet Russia where basically all of them took up high level positions in the new government. The only person who died in that "assassination attempt" was the low-level incompetent assassin.

This pattern repeats all the time. That we see it with Hitler is no surprise at all.

Importantly, no Rothschilds were harmed in the making of the WWII movie. Their “confiscated goods” were all returned to them. Believing that an act of “opposition” is as it appears on the surface does not understand how the world actually works at all.

Not all jews are involved in the fuckery, but to claim that the elite types are not jews is nonsense.

That is not what I said. I’m not sure where you got that from. If you are taking that from where I said, " who call themselves Jews," I say that about everyone who calls themselves Jews, because it is an important distinction from those who follow the same ideologies and have the same ancestry and do not call themselves Jews (aka Crypto-Jews).

 the Khazarians came from SOMEWHERE. That somewhere appears to be those same biblical jews, who migrated various places and ultimately landed in Khazaria.

I agree completely. What is not appreciated is that the Khazarians were the Scythians, AKA the Tartarians, and the Tartarians were wiped out of history to disconnect all the groups from each other (at least that is what I think the motive was). There is so much more to that story. Specifically, I think the Jews who infiltrated the Khazarians may have been the Magogians, the “lost tribe” of Israel.

132 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

the overthrow of the Russian people was funded by Wall Street and London banker jews.

I was talking about the Russian people before the Communist Revolutions (the Czar and his government who enacted the Pogroms). They also were controlled by the same people (bankers). It was all a Play, a Show, from day one.

Hitler was not a Rothschild or Rockefeller puppet. He was fighting against them, which is why they wanted to take him down.

Hitler was absolutely a puppet. He was put into power and funded by both of those families from day one. Did he "rebel" in the end (around 1943)? I am most certainly not convinced of that. There is evidence that supports that, but as far as I can tell, everything played out exactly as intended. It is far more likely that he was playing a different part in the Controlled Opposition play than any actual "rebellion."

He arrested a Rothschild banker when Austria joined Germany.

This is not evidence of rebellion. This is evidence of creating a narrative. It MUST LOOK LIKE you are "against" for the Play to sell to the public. This plays out like this all the time. Jessie Smollet is a modern day example of this, but this type of Controlled Opposition goes back forever.

As another prominent example, in 1914 there was an "assassination attempt" on Rockefeller by Alexander Berkman, who just so happens to have been the nephew and adopted son of Mark Natanson, who was basically the father of the Bolshevik Revolution. Mr. Berkman was BFFs with Margaret Sanger, Rose Parks Stokes, Emma Goldman, and about twenty other people (all members of the IWW) who are provably agents of Rockefeller and Rothschild. The only people who died in this "assassination attempt" were the low-level "incompetent" assassins who failed completely to do what they intended.

This exact same group of people attempted another "assassination" on a bunch of top level people in American Corporations and Government (two different words for the same organization) in 1918, one of whom happened to be Rockefeller again. This resulted in the First Red Scare. The "perpetrators," like Mr. Berkman, Emma Goldman, and numerous other "Anarcho-Communists" were deported to the newly formed Soviet Russia where basically all of them took up high level positions in the new government. The only person who died in that "assassination attempt" was the low-level incompetent assassin.

This pattern repeats all the time. That we see it with Hitler is no surprise at all.

Importantly, no Rothschilds were harmed in the making of the WWII movie. Their “confiscated goods” were all returned to them. Believing that an act of “opposition” is as it appears on the surface does not understand how the world actually works at all.

Not all jews are involved in the fuckery, but to claim that the elite types are not jews is nonsense.

That is not what I said. I’m not sure where you got that from. If you are taking that from where I said, " who call themselves Jews," I say that about everyone who calls themselves Jews, because it is an important distinction from those who follow the same ideologies and have the same ancestry and do not call themselves Jews (aka Crypto-Jews).

 the Khazarians came from SOMEWHERE. That somewhere appears to be those same biblical jews, who migrated various places and ultimately landed in Khazaria.

I agree completely. What is not appreciated is that the Khazarians were the Scythians, AKA the Tartarians, and the Tartarians were wiped out of history to disconnect all the groups from each other (at least that is what I think the motive was). There is so much more to that story. Specifically, I think the Jews who infiltrated the Khazarians may have been the Magogians, the “lost tribe” of Israel.

132 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

the overthrow of the Russian people was funded by Wall Street and London banker jews.

I was talking about the Russian people before the Communist Revolutions (the Czar and his government who enacted the Pogroms). They also were controlled by the same people (bankers). It was all a Play, a Show, from day one.

Hitler was not a Rothschild or Rockefeller puppet. He was fighting against them, which is why they wanted to take him down.

Hitler was absolutely a puppet. He was put into power and funded by both of those families from day one. Did he "rebel" in the end (around 1943)? I am most certainly not convinced of that. There is evidence that supports that, but as far as I can tell, everything played out exactly as intended. It is far more likely that he was playing a different part in the Controlled Opposition play than any actual "rebellion."

He arrested a Rothschild banker when Austria joined Germany.

This is not evidence of rebellion. This is evidence of creating a narrative. It MUST LOOK LIKE you are "against" for the Play to sell to the public. This plays out like this all the time. Jessie Smollet is a modern day example of this, but this type of Controlled Opposition goes back forever.

As another prominent example, in 1914 there was an "assassination attempt" on Rockefeller by Alexander Berkman, who just so happens to have been the nephew and adopted son of Mark Natanson, who was basically the father of the Bolshevik Revolution. Mr. Berkman was BFFs with Margaret Sanger, Rose Parks Stokes, Emma Goldman, and about twenty other people (all members of the IWW) who are provably agents of Rockefeller and Rothschild. The only people who died in this "assassination attempt" were the low-level "incompetent" assassins who failed completely to do what they intended.

This exact same group of people attempted another "assassination" on a bunch of top level people in American Corporations and Government (two different words for the same organization) in 1918, one of whom happened to be Rockefeller again. This resulted in the First Red Scare. The "perpetrators," like Mr. Berkman, Emma Goldman, and numerous other "Anarcho-Communists" were deported to the newly formed Soviet Russia where basically all of them took up high level positions in the new government. The only person who died in that "assassination attempt" was the incompetent assassin.

This pattern repeats all the time. That we see it with Hitler is no surprise at all.

Importantly, no Rothschilds were harmed in the making of the WWII movie. Their “confiscated goods” were all returned to them. Believing that an act of “opposition” is as it appears on the surface does not understand how the world actually works at all.

Not all jews are involved in the fuckery, but to claim that the elite types are not jews is nonsense.

That is not what I said. I’m not sure where you got that from. If you are taking that from where I said, " who call themselves Jews," I say that about everyone who calls themselves Jews, because it is an important distinction from those who follow the same ideologies and have the same ancestry and do not call themselves Jews (aka Crypto-Jews).

 the Khazarians came from SOMEWHERE. That somewhere appears to be those same biblical jews, who migrated various places and ultimately landed in Khazaria.

I agree completely. What is not appreciated is that the Khazarians were the Scythians, AKA the Tartarians, and the Tartarians were wiped out of history to disconnect all the groups from each other (at least that is what I think the motive was). There is so much more to that story. Specifically, I think the Jews who infiltrated the Khazarians may have been the Magogians, the “lost tribe” of Israel.

132 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

the overthrow of the Russian people was funded by Wall Street and London banker jews.

I was talking about the Russian people before the Communist Revolutions (the Czar and his government who enacted the Pogroms). They also were controlled by the same people (bankers). It was all a Play, a Show, from day one.

Hitler was not a Rothschild or Rockefeller puppet. He was fighting against them, which is why they wanted to take him down.

Hitler was absolutely a puppet. He was put into power and funded by both of those families from day one. Did he "rebel" in the end (around 1943)? I am most certainly not convinced of that. There is evidence that supports that, but as far as I can tell, everything played out exactly as intended. It is far more likely that he was playing a different part in the Controlled Opposition play than any actual "rebellion."

He arrested a Rothschild banker when Austria joined Germany.

This is not evidence of rebellion. This is evidence of creating a narrative. It MUST LOOK LIKE you are "against" for the Play to sell to the public. This plays out like this all the time. Jessie Smollet is a modern day example of this, but this type of Controlled Opposition goes back forever.

As another prominent example, in 1914 there was an "assassination attempt" on Rockefeller by Alexander Berkman, who just so happens to have been the nephew and adopted son of Mark Natanson, who was basically the father of the Bolshevik Revolution. Mr. Berkman was BFFs with Margaret Sanger, Rose Parks Stokes, Emma Goldman, and about twenty other people (all members of the IWW) who are provably agents of Rockefeller and Rothschild. The only people who died in this "assassination attempt" were the "incompetent" assassins who failed completely to do what they intended.

This exact same group of people "attempted" another "assassination" on a bunch of top level people in American Corporations and Government (two different words for the same organization) in 1918, one of whom happened to be Rockefeller again. This resulted in the First Red Scare. The "perpetrators," like Mr. Berkman, Emma Goldman, and numerous other "Anarcho-Communists" were deported to the newly formed Soviet Russia where basically all of them took up high level positions in the new government. The only person who died in that "assassination attempt" was the incompetent assassin.

This pattern repeats all the time. That we see it with Hitler is no surprise at all.

Importantly, no Rothschilds were harmed in the making of the WWII movie. Their “confiscated goods” were all returned to them. Believing that an act of “opposition” is as it appears on the surface does not understand how the world actually works at all.

Not all jews are involved in the fuckery, but to claim that the elite types are not jews is nonsense.

That is not what I said. I’m not sure where you got that from. If you are taking that from where I said, " who call themselves Jews," I say that about everyone who calls themselves Jews, because it is an important distinction from those who follow the same ideologies and have the same ancestry and do not call themselves Jews (aka Crypto-Jews).

 the Khazarians came from SOMEWHERE. That somewhere appears to be those same biblical jews, who migrated various places and ultimately landed in Khazaria.

I agree completely. What is not appreciated is that the Khazarians were the Scythians, AKA the Tartarians, and the Tartarians were wiped out of history to disconnect all the groups from each other (at least that is what I think the motive was). There is so much more to that story. Specifically, I think the Jews who infiltrated the Khazarians may have been the Magogians, the “lost tribe” of Israel.

132 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

the overthrow of the Russian people was funded by Wall Street and London banker jews.

I was talking about the Russian people before the Communist Revolutions (the Czar and his government who enacted the Pogroms). They also were controlled by the same people (bankers). It was all a Play, a Show, from day one.

Hitler was not a Rothschild or Rockefeller puppet. He was fighting against them, which is why they wanted to take him down.

Hitler was absolutely a puppet. He was put into power and funded by both of those families from day one. Did he "rebel" in the end (around 1943)? I am most certainly not convinced of that. There is evidence that supports that, but as far as I can tell, everything played out exactly as intended. It is far more likely that he was playing a different part in the Controlled Opposition play than any actual "rebellion."

He arrested a Rothschild banker when Austria joined Germany.

This is not evidence of rebellion. This is evidence of creating a narrative. It MUST LOOK LIKE you are "against" for the Play to sell to the public. This plays out like this all the time. Jessie Smollet is a modern day example of this, but this type of Controlled Opposition goes back forever.

As another prominent example, in 1914 there was an "assassination attempt" on Rockefeller by Alexander Berkman, who just so happens to have been the nephew and adopted son of Mark Natanson, who was basically the father of the Bolshevik Revolution. Mr. Berkman was BFFs with Margaret Sanger, Rose Parks Stokes, Emma Goldman, and about twenty other people (all members of the IWW) who are provably agents of Rockefeller and Rothschild. The only people who died in this "assassination attempt" were the "incompetent" assassins who failed completely to do what they intended.

This exact same group of people "attempted" another "assassination" on a bunch of top level people in American Corporations and Government (two different words for the same organization) in 1918, one of whom happened to be Rockefeller again. This resulted in the First Red Scare. The "perpetrators," like Mr. Berkman, Emma Goldman, and numerous other "Anarcho-Communists" were deported to the newly formed Soviet Russia where basically all of them took up high level positions in the new government. The only person who died in that "assassination attempt" was the incompetent assassin.

This pattern repeats all the time. That we see it with Hitler is no surprise at all.

Importantly, no Rothschilds were harmed in the making of the WWII movie. Their “confiscated goods” were all returned to them. Believing that an act of “opposition” is as it appears on the surface does not understand how the world actually works at all.

Not all jews are involved in the fuckery, but to claim that the elite types are not jews is nonsense.

That is not what I said. I’m not sure where you got that from. If you are taking that from where I said, " who call themselves Jews," I say that about everyone who calls themselves Jews, because it is an important distinction from those who follow the same ideologies and have the same ancestry and do not call themselves Jews (aka Crypto-Jews).

 the Khazarians came from SOMEWHERE. That somewhere appears to be those same biblical jews, who migrated various places and ultimately landed in Khazaria.

I agree completely. What is not appreciated is that the Khazarians were the Sythians, AKA the Tartarians, and the Tartarians were wiped out of history to disconnect all the groups from each other (at least that is what I think the motive was). There is so much more to that story. Specifically, I think the Jews who infiltrated the Khazarians may have been the Magogians, the “lost tribe” of Israel.

132 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

the overthrow of the Russian people was funded by Wall Street and London banker jews.

I was talking about the Russian people before the Communist Revolutions (the Czar and his government who enacted the Pogroms). They also were controlled by the same people (bankers). It was all a Play, a Show, from day one.

Hitler was not a Rothschild or Rockefeller puppet. He was fighting against them, which is why they wanted to take him down.

Hitler was absolutely a puppet. He was put into power and funded by both of those families from day one. Did he "rebel" in the end (around 1943)? I am most certainly not convinced of that. There is evidence that supports that, but as far as I can tell, everything played out exactly as intended. It is far more likely that he was playing a different part in the Controlled Opposition play than any actual "rebellion."

He arrested a Rothschild banker when Austria joined Germany.

This is not evidence of rebellion. This is evidence of creating a narrative. It MUST LOOK LIKE you are "against" for the Play to sell to the public. This plays out like this all the time. Jessie Smollet is a modern day example of this, but this type of Controlled Opposition goes back forever.

As another prominent example, in 1914 there was an "assassination attempt" on Rockefeller by Alexander Berkman, who just so happens to have been the nephew and adopted son of Mark Natanson, who was basically the father of the Bolshevik Revolution. Mr. Berkman was BFFs with Margaret Sanger, Rose Parks Stokes, Emma Goldman, and about twenty other people (all members of the IWW) who are provably agents of Rockefeller and Rothschild. The only people who died in this "assassination attempt" were the "incompetent" assassins who failed completely to do what they intended.

This exact same group of people "attempted" another "assassination" on a bunch of top level people in Corporation and Government (two different words for the same organization) in 1918, one of whom happened to be Rockefeller again. This resulted in the First Red Scare. The "perpetrators," like Mr. Berkman, Emma Goldman, and numerous other "Anarcho-Communists" were deported to the newly formed Soviet Russia where basically all of them took up high level positions in the new government. The only person who died in that "assassination attempt" was the incompetent assassin.

This pattern repeats all the time. That we see it with Hitler is no surprise at all.

Importantly, no Rothschilds were harmed in the making of the WWII movie. Their “confiscated goods” were all returned to them. Believing that an act of “opposition” is as it appears on the surface does not understand how the world actually works at all.

Not all jews are involved in the fuckery, but to claim that the elite types are not jews is nonsense.

That is not what I said. I’m not sure where you got that from. If you are taking that from where I said, " who call themselves Jews," I say that about everyone who calls themselves Jews, because it is an important distinction from those who follow the same ideologies and have the same ancestry and do not call themselves Jews (aka Crypto-Jews).

 the Khazarians came from SOMEWHERE. That somewhere appears to be those same biblical jews, who migrated various places and ultimately landed in Khazaria.

I agree completely. What is not appreciated is that the Khazarians were the Sythians, AKA the Tartarians, and the Tartarians were wiped out of history to disconnect all the groups from each other (at least that is what I think the motive was). There is so much more to that story. Specifically, I think the Jews who infiltrated the Khazarians may have been the Magogians, the “lost tribe” of Israel.

132 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

the overthrow of the Russian people was funded by Wall Street and London banker jews.

I was talking about the Russian people before the Communist Revolutions (the Czar and his government who enacted the Pogroms). They also were controlled by the same people (bankers). It was all a Play, a Show, from day one.

Hitler was not a Rothschild or Rockefeller puppet. He was fighting against them, which is why they wanted to take him down.

Hitler was absolutely a puppet. He was put into power and funded by both of those families from day one. Did he "rebel" in the end (around 1943)? I am most certainly not convinced of that. There is evidence that supports that, but as far as I can tell, everything played out exactly as intended. It is far more likely that he was playing a different part in the Controlled Opposition play than any actual "rebellion."

He arrested a Rothschild banker when Austria joined Germany.

This is not evidence of rebellion. This is evidence of creating a narrative. It MUST LOOK LIKE you are "against" for the Play to sell to the public. This plays out like this all the time. Jessie Smollet is a modern day example of this, but this type of Controlled Opposition goes back forever.

As another prominent example, in 1914 there was an "assassination attempt" on Rockefeller by Alexander Berkman, who just so happens to have been the nephew and adopted son of Mark Natanson, who was basically the father of the Bolshevik Revolution. Mr. Berkman was BFFs with Margaret Sanger, Rose Parks Stokes, Emma Goldman, and about twenty other people (all members of the IWW) who are provably agents of Rockefeller and Rothschild. The only people who died in this "assassination attempt" were the "incompetent" assassins who failed completely to do what they intended.

This exact same group of people "attempted" another "assassination" on a bunch of top level people in Corporation and Government (two different words for the same organization) in 1918, one of whom happened to be Rockefeller again. This resulted in the First Red Scare. The "perpetrators," like Mr. Berkman, Emma Goldman, and numerous other "Anarcho-Communists" were deported to the newly formed Soviet Russia where basically all of them took up high level positions in the new government. The only person who died in that "assassination attempt" was the incompetent assassin.

This pattern repeats all the time. That we see it with Hitler is no surprise at all.

Importantly, no Rothschilds were harmed in the making of the WWII movie. Their “confiscated goods” were all returned to them. Believing that an act of “opposition” is as it appears on the surface does not understand how the world actually works at all.

Not all jews are involved in the fuckery, but to claim that the elite types are not jews is nonsense.

That is not what I said. I’m not sure where you got that from. If you are taking that from where I said, " who call themselves Jews," I say that about everyone who calls themselves Jews, because it is an important distinction from those who follow the same ideologies and have the same ancestry and do not call themselves Jews (aka Crypto-Jews).

 the Khazarians came from SOMEWHERE. That somewhere appears to be those same biblical jews, who migrated various places and ultimately landed in Khazaria.

I agree completely. What is not appreciated is that the Khazarians were the Sythians, AKA the Tartarians. There is so much more to that story. Specifically, I think the Jews who infiltrated the Khazarians may have been the Magogians, the “lost tribe” of Israel.

132 days ago
1 score