Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I call BS. Not to be anti-alarmist, but:

  1. If 12 years of nuclear bomb testing in this place from 1946 to 1958 didn't kill all of us with the airborne radiation clouds kicked up by that do you really think a collapsed dome is going to put more aloft than an average of 1.6 Hiroshima bombs per day for 12 years did.
  2. this dome has been leaking for a while and:

according to a 2013 report by the US Department of Energy, soil around the dome is already more contaminated than its contents.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/03/runit-dome-pacific-radioactive-waste

120 days ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

I call BS. Not to be anti-alarmist, but:

  1. If 12 years of nuclear bomb testing in this place from 1946 to 1958 didn't kill all of us with the airborne radiation clouds kicked up by that do you really think a collapsed dome is going to put more than aloft than an average of 1.6 Hiroshima bombs per day for 12 years did.
  2. this dome has been leaking for a while and:

according to a 2013 report by the US Department of Energy, soil around the dome is already more contaminated than its contents.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/03/runit-dome-pacific-radioactive-waste

120 days ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

Not to be anti-alarmist, but:

  1. If 12 years of nuclear bomb testing in this place from 1946 to 1958 didn't kill all of us with the airborne radiation clouds kicked up by that do you really think a collapsed dome is going to put more than aloft than an average of 1.6 Hiroshima bombs per day for 12 years did.
  2. this dome has been leaking for a while and:

according to a 2013 report by the US Department of Energy, soil around the dome is already more contaminated than its contents.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/03/runit-dome-pacific-radioactive-waste

120 days ago
3 score
Reason: Original

Not to be anti-alarmist, but:

  1. If 12 years of nuclear bomb testing in this place from 1946 to 1958 didn't kill all of us with the airborne radiation clouds kicked up by that a collapsed dome isn't going to put more than aloft than an average of 1.6 Hiroshima bombs per day for 12 years did.
  2. this dome has been leaking for a while and:

according to a 2013 report by the US Department of Energy, soil around the dome is already more contaminated than its contents.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/03/runit-dome-pacific-radioactive-waste

120 days ago
1 score