Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

There is a reason The Blocksize Wars ended the way they did.

To impose a degree of centralization onto a previously decentralized network

I also don't see any large banks, hedge funds, or intelligent investors placing their bets with Bitcoin Cash.

Let's acknowledge that the point of Bitcoin was to destroy those institutions. They're just embracing the coin with the largest market cap. If Bitcoin weren't hijacked, they would be embracing pure, decentralized, big-blocked Bitcoin.

It was obvious back then that the shady team were the small blockers. The Big Blockers were definitely more liberty focused. As someone who has followed bitcoin since 2010, I can say that those in favor of layer 2 scaling are not the same liberty-loving breed as the OG's.

I'm not recommending that any reader should buy Bitcoin Cash. I'm saying that without a propaganda campaign that changed bitcoin, there'd have been no need to create Bitcoin Cash. Bitcoin Cash is not Bitcoin, however. It's just a copy of what Bitcoin was supposed to be.

Here's a random article about it that even mentions Epstein's name for anyone following along. No idea how accurate it is. https://medium.com/coinmonks/lightning-network-the-trojan-horse-of-the-crypt-industry-f26e3cc8cd46

110 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

There is a reason The Blocksize Wars ended the way they did.

To impose a degree of centralization onto a previously decentralized network

I also don't see any large banks, hedge funds, or intelligent investors placing their bets with Bitcoin Cash.

Let's acknowledge that the point of Bitcoin was to destroy those institutions. They're just embracing the coin with the largest market cap. If Bitcoin weren't hijacked, they would be embracing pure, decentralized, big-blocked Bitcoin.

It was obvious back then that the shady team were the small blockers. The Big Blockers were definitely more liberty focused. As someone who has followed bitcoin since 2010, I can say that those in favor of layer 2 scaling are not the same liberty-loving breed as the OG's.

I'm not recommending that any reader should buy Bitcoin Cash. I'm saying that without a propaganda campaign that changed bitcoin, there' have been no need to create Bitcoin Cash. Bitcoin Cash is not Bitcoin, however. It's just a copy of what Bitcoin was supposed to be.

Here's a random article about it that even mentions Epstein's name for anyone following along. No idea how accurate it is. https://medium.com/coinmonks/lightning-network-the-trojan-horse-of-the-crypt-industry-f26e3cc8cd46

110 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

There is a reason The Blocksize Wars ended the way they did.

To impose a degree of centralization onto a previously decentralized network

I also don't see any large banks, hedge funds, or intelligent investors placing their bets with Bitcoin Cash.

Let's acknowledge that the point of Bitcoin was to destroy those institutions. They're just embracing the coin with the largest market cap. If Bitcoin weren't hijacked, they would be embracing pure, decentralized, big-blocked Bitcoin.

It was obvious back then that the shady team were the small blockers. The Big Blockers were definitely more liberty focused. As someone who has followed bitcoin since 2010, I can say that those in favor of layer 2 scaling are not the same liberty-loving breed as the OG's.

I'm not recommending that any reader should buy Bitcoin Cash. I'm saying that without a propaganda campaign that changed bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash would have never been created. Bitcoin Cash is not Bitcoin, it's just a copy of what Bitcoin was supposed to be.

Here's a random article about it that even mentions Epstein's name for anyone following along. No idea how accurate it is. https://medium.com/coinmonks/lightning-network-the-trojan-horse-of-the-crypt-industry-f26e3cc8cd46

110 days ago
1 score