Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I have talked to quite a few people about this -- IRL.

I usually throw out "that Covid bullshit we had to deal with" when we are talking about whatever random topic.

Some people ignore. Others pick up on it, so the conversation can continue.

I ask, "What do you think that was all about?"

If I get anything other than "oh, muh science! and muh Fauci" kind of drivel, I will go down that path for a minute or so.

Then I will say, "It's even worse than that. What if I told you the virus didn't even exist?"

Most people will pick up on that, but I can tell that some are already tuned out (like here on GAW, as well).

But some will ask about that, either in a truely inquisitive way, or an ok, buddy, I gotta hear THIS (in a not-so-believing way).

I then say it's a bit of a complex topic, so I can't explain it in 2 minutes, but in less than 10, I can tell you how it has been proven in a lab that viruses do not exist, and how you can control your own heath without worrying about the boogeyman of the virus.

Only if they say sure, tell me, do I then proceed.

I start with the history going back to the late 1800's when bacteria were discovered -- and bacteria are real, but not harmful. They are the clean up crew (janitors) of the biological world.

But back then, they thought that bacteria were harmful. They noticed bacteria in the blood samples of sick people, when viewed under a microscope.

They concluded that the bacteria must have caused the sickness.

Louis Pasteur was the one who came up with Germ Theory, but he was a liar. His own personal journals were found where he admitted he rigged his experiments to get the results he wanted.

They also found that some people were sick but they could not find any bacteria.

So, they concluded that something else, too small to see, must have caused the illness. This is because they had already bought into Germ Theory, which turns out was false all along.

To describe these things they thought existed but could not see, they used the latin word for poison -- virus.

For the next 70 years, they tried to prove that viruses existed, that they caused illness, and that they were transmissible and could make other people sick.

But for 70 years and hundreds of trials with thousands of people, they could never prove any of it.

I talk a little about the Spanish Flu of 1918, where they tried to prove virology but never could. BTW, Spanish Flu was not caused by a virus. It was a poison caused by the massive vaccine campaign, which harmed millions of people.

In addition, the light bulb had recently been invented and cities were installing electricity into their homes. This was a massive increase in electromagnetic frequencies that humans had never been exposed to in history, and may have contributed to sickness, as well.

Then, I talk about the 1950's when virology was all but dead, and Enders came up with a PROCESS to supposedly find viruses.

I then talk about the process to find bacteria, which is valid, and is used all the time to study bacteria and other microorganisms.

BUT ... and here is the big deal ... that process to study microorganisms is NOT the process used to study viruses.

The virus process is completely different -- first created by Enders.

And then I talk about the 2021 study by virologist Stefan Lanka, where he proved that what virologists THINK they are looking at is actually nothing more than the harmless artifacts (remnants) of the PROCESS used. Those "spike proteins" are just the dying fragments of dead cells that were killed using the process.

And if you do the EXACT SAME PROCESS ... but DO NOT START WITH ANY BODILY FLUIDS of a human or animal ... you will get THE SAME END RESULT.

This is why the president of Tanzaia was able to send in lab samples for Covid testing and all the samples came back postive for Covid. Only problem was, some of the samples were from a goat, fruit, and motor oil, but they all came back positive for Covid. Why? Because the samples had human names on the label, and the people doing the testing used a false test that they did not realize was false.

This is because the PROCESS TO STUDY VIRUSES by itself CAUSES the positive result. (There's more to it than that, but close enough for an overview).

Those "spike proteins" are said to be the mechanism that allows the virus to get into cells and cause harm.

But those "spike proteins" never actually existed inside the person. How could they, if they are created outside of the person -- in a lab -- when the process to study the "virus" is used? They are CREATED in the lab during the proess to "find a virus," and they never existed inside the person.

The control -- that most virologists have never used -- was doing the same process but NOT starting with any bodily fluids of a person or animal. Yet, they got the SAME spike proteins. Those are the ejections of dead cell material because the PROCESS is what killed the cells and caused the spike proteins to appear in the electron microscope photos.

They were never inside the person -- or at least, nobody has ever provided any evidence they they were. Therefore, the entire thing is a fraud.

The fraud was started by Enders, and no virologist until 2021 ever thought to reinvestigate the fundamental building blocks of virology by using a control test for the process itself. But once Stefan Lanka did, he proved that the process itself (which is ONLY used for viruses, not any other microorganisms) is what creates those spike proteins -- in the lab -- and they were never inside a person.

This is called the "Cytopathic Effect." The process used to "find a virus" causes the breakdown and death of the monkey kidney cells (vero cells), which results in the ejection of cellular material, which is what is claimed to be the "spike protein" seen in the electron microscope photos.

But those cellular ejections (exosomes) were never inside any person.

If the end result is the ONLY proof that a virologist uses to claim that he has found/studied the virus, but you get the SAME end result even if you don't use any DNA from any human, then clearly the process itself is what caused the result -- the Cytopathic Effect.

At that point, either they have questions (but what about chicken pox or the flu? etc.), or they want to know where they can find more info to learn more (and verify or refute), or they have the thousand-yard stare and obviously have no clue WTF I just said.

It is a lot to take in -- asking someone to re-think something they believed their entire lives, and everyone around them and in the media and the doctors' offices also believes it. Change that mindset in 5 minutes? Hard to do, and yet ...

It's around 30%-50% who show some interest, which means at leaast some of those will eventually understand it themselves, and be able to explain it to others.

Once enough people understand the deception, the deception will necessarily end.

I also let them know that it is important for them to learn the truth about this because the virus hoax that has been pushed on us is the entire basis for government tyranny against us -- lock downs, isolation, vaccines, face masks, no grocery buying, no fly lists, etc. and all things they would want to do to control the People.

114 days ago
4 score
Reason: None provided.

I have talked to quite a few people about this -- IRL.

I usually throw out "that Covid bullshit we had to deal with" when we are talking about whatever random topic.

Some people ignore. Others pick up on it, so the conversation can continue.

I ask, "What do you think that was all about?"

If I get anything other than "oh, muh science! and muh Fauci" kind of drivel, I will go down that path for a minute or so.

Then I will say, "It's even worse than that. What if I told you the virus didn't even exist?"

Most people will pick up on that, but I can tell that some are already tuned out (like here on GAW, as well).

But some will ask about that, either in a truely inquisitive way, or an ok, buddy, I gotta hear THIS (in a not-so-believing way).

I then say it's a bit of a complex topic, so I can't explain it in 2 minutes, but in less than 10, I can tell you how it has been proven in a lab that viruses do not exist, and how you can control your own heath without worrying about the boogeyman of the virus.

Only if they say sure, tell me, do I then proceed.

I start with the history going back to the late 1800's when bacteria were discovered -- and bacteria are real, but not harmful. They are the clean up crew (janitors) of the biological world.

But back then, they thought that bacteria were harmful. They noticed bacteria in the blood samples of sick people, when viewed under a microscope.

They concluded that the bacteria must have caused the sickness.

Louis Pasteur was the one who came up with Germ Theory, but he was a liar. His own personal journals were found where he admitted he rigged his experiments to get the results he wanted.

They also found that some people were sick but they could not find any bacteria.

So, they concluded that something else, too small to see, must have caused the illness. This is because they had already bought into Germ Theory, which turns out was false all along.

To describe these things they thought existed but could not see, they used the latin word for poison -- virus.

For the next 70 years, they tried to prove that viruses existed, that they caused illness, and that they were transmissible and could make other people sick.

But for 70 years and hundreds of trials with thousands of people, they could never prove any of it.

I talk a little about the Spanish Flu of 1918, where they tried to prove virology but never could. BTW, Spanish Flu was not caused by a virus. It was a poison caused by the massive vaccine campaign, which harmed millions of people.

In addition, the light bulb had recently been invented and cities were installing electricity into their homes. This was a massive increase in electromagnetic frequencies that humans had never been exposed to in history, and may have contributed to sickness, as well.

Then, I talk about the 1950's when virology was all but dead, and Enders came up with a PROCESS to supposedly find viruses.

I then talk about the process to find bacteria, which is valid, and is used all the time to study bacteria and other microorganisms.

BUT ... and here is the big deal ... that process to study microorganisms is NOT the process used to study viruses.

The virus process is completely different -- first created by Enders.

And then I talk about the 2021 study by virologist Stefan Lanka, where he proved that what virologists THINK they are looking at is actually nothing more than the harmless artifacts (remnants) of the PROCESS used. Those "spike proteins" are just the dying fragments of dead cells that were killed using the process.

And if you do the EXACT SAME PROCESS ... but DO NOT START WITH ANY BODILY FLUIDS of a human or animal ... you will get THE SAME END RESULT.

This is why the president of Tanzaia was able to send in lab samples for Covid testing and all the samples came back postive for Covid. Only problem was, some of the samples were from a goat, fruit, and motor oil, but they all came back positive for Covid. Why? Because the samples had human names on the label, and the people doing the testing used a false test that they did not realize was false.

This is because the PROCESS TO STUDY VIRUSES by itself CAUSES the positive result. (There's more to it than that, but close enough for an overview).

Those "spike proteins" are said to be the mechanism that allows the virus to get into cells and cause harm.

But those "spike proteins" never actually existed inside the person. How could they, if they are created outside of the person -- in a lab -- when the process to study the "virus" is used? They are CREATED in the lab during the proess to "find a virus," and they never existed inside the person.

The control -- that most virologists have never used -- was doing the same process but NOT starting with any bodily fluids of a person or animal. Yet, they got the SAME spike proteins. Those are the ejections of dead cell material because the PROCESS is what killed the cells and caused the spike proteins to appear in the electron microscope photos.

They were never inside the person -- or at least, nobody has ever provided any evidence they they were. Therefore, the entire thing is a fraud.

The fraud was started by Enders, and no virologist until 2021 ever thought to reinvestigate the fundamental building blocks of virology by using a control test for the process itself. But once Stefan Lanka did, he proved that the process itself (which is ONLY used for viruses, not any other microorganisms) is what creates those spike proteins -- in the lab -- and they were never inside a person.

This is called the "Cytopathic Effect." The process used to "find a virus" causes the breakdown and death of the monkey kidney cells (vero cells), which results in the ejection of cellular material, which is what is claimed to be the "spike protein" seen in the electron microscope photos.

But those cellular ejections (exosomes) were never inside any person.

If the end result is the ONLY proof that a virologist uses to claim that he has found/studied the virus, but you get the SAME end result even if you don't use any DNA from any human, then clearly the process itself is what caused the result -- they Cytopathic Effect.

At that point, either they have questions (but what about chicken pox or the flu? etc.), or they want to know where they can find more info to learn more (and verify or refute), or they have the thousand-yard stare and obviously have no clue WTF I just said.

It is a lot to take in -- asking someone to re-think something they believed their entire lives, and everyone around them and in the media and the doctors' offices also believes it. Change that mindset in 5 minutes? Hard to do, and yet ...

It's around 30%-50% who show some interest, which means at leaast some of those will eventually understand it themselves, and be able to explain it to others.

Once enough people understand the deception, the deception will necessarily end.

I also let them know that it is important for them to learn the truth about this because the virus hoax that has been pushed on us is the entire basis for government tyranny against us -- lock downs, isolation, vaccines, face masks, no grocery buying, no fly lists, etc. and all things they would want to do to control the People.

114 days ago
4 score
Reason: None provided.

I have talked to quite a few people about this -- IRL.

I usually throw out "that Covid bullshit we had to deal with" when we are talking about whatever random topic.

Some people ignore. Others pick up on it, so the conversation can continue.

I ask, "What do you think that was all about?"

If I get anything other than "oh, muh science! and muh Fauci" kind of drivel, I will go down that path for a minute or so.

Then I will say, "It's even worse than that. What if I told you the virus didn't even exist?"

Most people will pick up on that, but I can tell that some are already tuned out (like here on GAW, as well).

But some will ask about that, either in a truely inquisitive way, or an ok, buddy, I gotta hear THIS (in a not-so-believing way).

I then say it's a bit of a complex topic, so I can't explain it in 2 minutes, but in less than 10, I can tell you how it has been proven in a lab that viruses do not exist, and how you can control your own heath without worrying about the boogeyman of the virus.

Only if they say sure, tell me, do I then proceed.

I start with the history going back to the late 1800's when bacteria were discovered -- and bacteria are real, but not harmful. They are the clean up crew (janitors) of the biological world.

But back then, they thought that bacteria were harmful. They noticed bacteria in the blood samples of sick people, when viewed under a microscope.

They concluded that the bacteria must have caused the sickness.

Louis Pasteur was the one who came up with Germ Theory, but he was a liar. His own personal journals were found where he admitted he rigged his experiments to get the results he wanted.

They also found that some people were sick but they could not find any bacteria.

So, they concluded that something else, too small to see, must have caused the illness. This is because they had already bought into Germ Theory, which turns out was false all along.

To describe these things they thought existed but could not see, they used the latin word for poison -- virus.

For the next 70 years, they tried to prove that viruses existed, that they caused illness, and that they were transmissible and could make other people sick.

But for 70 years and hundreds of trials with thousands of people, they could never prove any of it.

I talk a little about the Spanish Flu of 1918, where they tried to prove virology but never could. BTW, Spanish Flu was not caused by a virus. It was a poison caused by the massive vaccine campaign, which harmed millions of people.

In addition, the light bulb had recently been invented and cities were installing electricity into their homes. This was a massive increase in electromagnetic frequencies that humans had never been exposed to in history, and may have contributed to sickness, as well.

Then, I talk about the 1950's when virology was all but dead, and Enders came up with a PROCESS to supposedly find viruses.

I then talk about the process to find bacteria, which is valid, and is used all the time to study bacteria and other microorganisms.

BUT ... and here is the big deal ... that process to study microorganisms is NOT the process used to study viruses.

The virus process is completely different -- first created by Enders.

And then I talk about the 2021 study by virologist Stefan Lanka, where he proved that what virologists THINK they are looking at is actually nothing more than the harmless artifacts (remnants) of the PROCESS used. Those "spike proteins" are just the dying fragments of dead cells that were killed using the process.

And if you do the EXACT SAME PROCESS ... but DO NOT START WITH ANY BODILY FLUIDS of a human or animal ... you will get THE SAME END RESULT.

This is why the president of Tanzaia was able to send in lab samples for Covid testing and all the samples came back postive for Covid. Only problem was, some of the samples were from a goat, fruit, and motor oil, but they all came back positive for Covid. Why? Because the samples had human names on the label, and the people doing the testing used a false test that they did not realize was false.

This is because the PROCESS TO STUDY VIRUSES by itself CAUSES the positive result. (There's more to it than that, but close enough for an overview).

Those "spike proteins" are said to be the mechanism that allows the virus to get into cells and cause harm.

But those "spike proteins" never actually existed inside the person. How could they, if they are created outside of the person -- in a lab -- when the process to study the "virus" is used? They are CREATED in the lab during the proess to "find a virus," and they never existed inside the person.

The control -- that most virologists have never used -- was doing the same process but NOT starting with any bodily fluids of a person or animal. Yet, they got the SAME spike proteins. Those are the ejections of dead cell material because the PROCESS is what killed the cells and caused the spike proteins to appear in the electron microscope photos.

They were never inside the person -- or at least, nobody has ever provided any evidence they they were. Therefore, the entire thing is a fraud.

The fraud was started by Enders, and no virologist until 2021 ever thought to reinvestigate the fundamental building blocks of virology by using a control test for the process itself. But once Stefan Lanka did, he proved that the process itself (which is ONLY used for viruses, not any other microorganisms) is what creates those spike proteins -- in the lab -- and they were never inside a person.

This is called the "Cytopathic Effect." The process used to "find a virus" causes the breakdown and death of the monkey kidney cells (viro cells), which results in the ejection of cellular material, which is what is claimed to be the "spike protein" seen in the electron microscope photos.

But those cellular ejections (exosomes) were never inside any person.

If the end result is the ONLY proof that a virologist uses to claim that he has found/studied the virus, but you get the SAME end result even if you don't use any DNA from any human, then clearly the process itself is what caused the result -- they Cytopathic Effect.

At that point, either they have questions (but what about chicken pox or the flu? etc.), or they want to know where they can find more info to learn more (and verify or refute), or they have the thousand-yard stare and obviously have no clue WTF I just said.

It is a lot to take in -- asking someone to re-think something they believed their entire lives, and everyone around them and in the media and the doctors' offices also believes it. Change that mindset in 5 minutes? Hard to do, and yet ...

It's around 30%-50% who show some interest, which means at leaast some of those will eventually understand it themselves, and be able to explain it to others.

Once enough people understand the deception, the deception will necessarily end.

I also let them know that it is important for them to learn the truth about this because the virus hoax that has been pushed on us is the entire basis for government tyranny against us -- lock downs, isolation, vaccines, face masks, no grocery buying, no fly lists, etc. and all things they would want to do to control the People.

114 days ago
4 score
Reason: None provided.

I have talked to quite a few people about this -- IRL.

I usually throw out "that Covid bullshit we had to deal with" when we are talking about whatever random topic.

Some people ignore. Others pick up on it, so the conversation can continue.

I ask, "What do you think that was all about?"

If I get anything other than "oh, muh science! and muh Fauci" kind of drivel, I will go down that path for a minute or so.

Then I will say, "It's even worse than that. What if I told you the virus didn't even exist?"

Most people will pick up on that, but I can tell that some are already tuned out (like here on GAW, as well).

But some will ask about that, either in a truely inquisitive way, or an ok, buddy, I gotta hear THIS (in a not-so-believing way).

I then say it's a bit of a complex topic, so I can't explain it in 2 minutes, but in less than 10, I can tell you how it has been proven in a lab that viruses do not exist, and how you can control your own heath without worrying about the boogeyman of the virus.

Only if they say sure, tell me, do I then proceed.

I start with the history going back to the late 1800's when bacteria were discovered -- and bacteria are real, but not harmful. They are the clean up crew (janitors) of the biological world.

But back then, they thought that bacteria were harmful. They noticed bacteria in the blood samples of sick people, when viewed under a microscope.

They concluded that the bacteria must have caused the sickness.

Louis Pasteur was the one who came up with Germ Theory, but he was a liar. His own personal journals were found where he admitted he rigged his experiments to get the results he wanted.

They also found that some people were sick but they could not find any bacteria.

So, they concluded that something else, too small to see, must have caused the illness. This is because they had already bought into Germ Theory, which turns out was false all along.

To describe these things they thought existed but could not see, they used the latin word for poison -- virus.

For the next 70 years, they tried to prove that viruses existed, that they caused illness, and that they were transmissible and could make other people sick.

But for 70 years and hundreds of trials with thousands of people, they could never prove any of it.

I talk a little about the Spanish Flu of 1918, where they tried to prove virology but never could. BTW, Spanish Flu was not caused by a virus. It was a poison caused by the massive vaccine campaign, which harmed millions of people.

In addition, the light bulb had recently been invented and cities were installing electricity into their homes. This was a massive increase in electromagnetic frequencies that humans had never been exposed to in history, and may have contributed to sickness, as well.

Then, I talk about the 1950's when virology was all but dead, and Enders came up with a PROCESS to supposedly find viruses.

I then talk about the process to find bacteria, which is valid, and is used all the time to study bacteria and other microorganisms.

BUT ... and here is the big deal ... that process to study microorganisms is NOT the process used to study viruses.

The virus process is completely different -- first created by Enders.

And then I talk about the 2021 study by virologist Stefan Lanka, where he proved that what virologists THINK they are looking at is actually nothing more than the harmless artifacts (remnants) of the PROCESS used. Those "spike proteins" are just the dying fragments of dead cells that were killed using the process.

And if you do the EXACT SAME PROCESS ... but DO NOT START WITH ANY BODILY FLUIDS of a human or animal ... you will get THE SAME END RESULT.

This is why the president of Tanzaia was able to send in lab samples for Covid testing and all the samples came back postive for Covid. Only problem was, some of the samples were from a goat, fruit, and motor oil, but they all came back positive for Covid. Why? Because the samples had human names on the label, and the people doing the testing used a false test that they did not realize was false.

This is because the PROCESS TO STUDY VIRUS by itself CAUSES the positive result. (There's more to it than that, but close enough for an overview).

Those "spike proteins" are said to be the mechanism that allows the virus to get into cells and cause harm.

But those "spike proteins" never actually existed inside the person. How could they, if they are caused outside of the person -- in a lab -- when the process to study the "virus" is used? They are CREATED in the lab during the proess to "find a virus," and they never existed inside the person.

The control -- that most virologists have never used -- was doing the same process but NOT starting with any bodily fluids of a person or animal. Yet, they got the SAME spike proteins. Those are the ejections of dead cell material because the PROCESS is what killed the cells and caused the spike proteins to appear in the electron microscope photos.

They were never inside the person -- or at least, nobody has ever provided any evidence they they were. Therefore, the entire thing is a fraud.

The fraud was started by Enders, and no virologist until 2021 ever thought to reinvestigate the fundamental building blocks of virology by using a control test for the process itself. But once Stefan Lanka did, he proved that the process itself (which is ONLY used for viruses, not any other microorganisms) is what creates those spike proteins -- in the lab -- and they were never inside a person.

This is called the "Cytopathic Effect." The process used to "find a virus" causes the breakdown and death of the monkey kidney cells (viro cells), which results in the ejection of cellular material, which is what is claimed to be the "spike protein" seen in the electron microscope photos.

But those cellular ejections (exosomes) were never inside any person.

If the end result is the ONLY proof that a virologist uses to claim that he has found/studied the virus, but you get the SAME end result even if you don't use any DNA from any human, then clearly the process itself is what caused the result -- they Cytopathic Effect.

At that point, either they have questions (but what about chicken pox or the flu? etc.), or they want to know where they can find more info to learn more (and verify or refute), or they have the thousand-yard stare and obviously have no clue WTF I just said.

It is a lot to take in -- asking someone to re-think something they believed their entire lives, and everyone around them and in the media and the doctors' offices also believes it. Change that mindset in 5 minutes? Hard to do, and yet ...

It's around 30%-50% who show some interest, which means at leaast some of those will eventually understand it themselves, and be able to explain it to others.

Once enough people understand the deception, the deception will necessarily end.

I also let them know that it is important for them to learn the truth about this because the virus hoax that has been pushed on us is the entire basis for government tyranny against us -- lock downs, isolation, vaccines, face masks, no grocery buying, no fly lists, etc. and all things they would want to do to control the People.

114 days ago
4 score
Reason: None provided.

I have talked to quite a few people about this -- IRL.

I usually throw out "that Covid bullshit we had to deal with" when we are talking about whatever random topic.

Some people ignore. Others pick up on it, so the conversation can continue.

I ask, "What do you think that was all about?"

If I get anything other than "oh, muh science! and muh Fauci" kind of drivel, I will go down that path for a minute or so.

Then I will say, "It's even worse than that. What if I told you the virus didn't even exist?"

Most people will pick up on that, but I can tell that some are already tuned out (like here on GAW, as well).

But some will ask about that, either in a truely inquisitive way, or an ok, buddy, I gotta hear THIS (in a not-so-believing way).

I then say it's a bit of a complex topic, so I can't explain it in 2 minutes, but in less than 10, I can tell you how it has been proven in a lab that viruses do not exist, and how you can control your own heath without worrying about the boogeyman of the virus.

Only if they say sure, tell me, do I then proceed.

I start with the history going back to the late 1800's when bacteria were discovered -- and bacteria are real, but not harmful. They are the clean up crew (janitors) of the biological world.

But back then, they thought that bacteria were harmful. They noticed bacteria in the blood samples of sick people, when viewed under a microscope.

They concluded that the bacteria must have caused the sickness.

Louis Pasteur was the one who came up with Germ Theory, but he was a liar. His own personal journals were found where he admitted he rigged his experiments to get the results he wanted.

They also found that some people were sick but they could not find any bacteria.

So, they concluded that something else, too small to see, must have caused the illness. This is because they had already bought into Germ Theory, which turns out was false all along.

To describe these things they thought existed but could not see, they used the latin word for poison -- virus.

For the next 70 years, they tried to prove that viruses existed, that they caused illness, and that they were transmissible and could make other people sick.

But for 70 years and hundreds of trials with thousands of people, they could never prove any of it.

I talk a little about the Spanish Flu of 1918, where they tried to prove virology but never could. BTW, Spanish Flu was not caused by a virus. It was a poison caused by the massive vaccine campaign, which harmed millions of people.

In addition, the light bulb had recently been invented and cities were installing electricity into their homes. This was a massive increase in electromagnetic frequencies that humans had never been exposed to in history, and may have contributed to sickness, as well.

Then, I talk about the 1950's when virology was all but dead, and Enders came up with a PROCESS to supposedly find viruses.

I then talk about the process to find bacteria, which is valid, and is used all the time to study bacteria and other microorganisms.

BUT ... and here is the big deal ... that process to study microorganism is NOT the process used to study viruses.

The virus process is completely different -- first created by Enders.

And then I talk about the 2021 study by virologist Stefan Lanka, where he proved that what virologists THINK they are looking at is actually nothing more than the harmless artifacts (remnants) of the PROCESS used. Those "spike proteins" are just the dying fragments of dead cells that were killed using the process.

And if you do the EXACT SAME PROCESS ... but DO NOT START WITH ANY BODILY FLUIDS of a human or animal ... you will get THE SAME END RESULT.

This is why the president of Tanzaia was able to send in lab samples for Covid testing and all the samples came back postive for Covid. Only problem was, some of the samples were from a goat, some fruit, and motor oil, but they all came back positive for Covid. Why? Because the samples had human names on the label, and the people doing the testing used a false test that they did not realize was false.

This is because the PROCESS TO STUDY VIRUS by itself CAUSES the positive result. (There's more to it than that, but close enough for an overview).

Those "spike proteins" are said to be the mechanism that allows the virus to get into cells and cause harm.

But those "spike proteins" never actually existed inside the person. How could they, if they are caused outside of the person -- in a lab -- when the process to study the "virus" is used? They are CREATED in the lab during the proess to "find a virus," and they never existed inside the person.

The control -- that most virologists have never used -- was doing the same process but NOT starting with any bodily fluids of a person or animal. Yet, they got the SAME spike proteins. Those are the ejections of dead cell material because the PROCESS is what killed the cells and caused the spike proteins to appear in the electron microscope photos.

They were never inside the person -- or at least, nobody has ever provided any evidence they they were. Therefore, the entire thing is a fraud.

The fraud was started by Enders, and no virologist until 2021 ever thought to reinvestigate the fundamental building blocks of virology by using a control test for the process itself. But once Stefan Lanka did, he proved that the process itself (which is ONLY used for viruses, not any other microorganisms) is what creates those spike proteins -- in the lab -- and they were never inside a person.

This is called the "Cytopathic Effect." The process used to "find a virus" causes the breakdown and death of the monkey kidney cells (viro cells), which results in the ejection of cellular material, which is what is claimed to be the "spike protein" seen in the electron microscope photos.

But those cellular ejections (exosomes) were never inside any person.

If the end result is the ONLY proof that a virologist uses to claim that he has found/studied the virus, but you get the SAME end result even if you don't use any DNA from any human, then clearly the process itself is what caused the result -- they Cytopathic Effect.

At that point, either they have questions (but what about chicken pox or the flu? etc.), or they want to know where they can find more info to learn more (and verify or refute), or they have the thousand-yard stare and obviously have no clue WTF I just said.

It is a lot to take in -- asking someone to re-think something they believed their entire lives, and everyone around them and in the media and the doctors' offices also believes it. Change that mindset in 5 minutes? Hard to do, and yet ...

It's around 30%-50% who show some interest, which means at leaast some of those will eventually understand it themselves, and be able to explain it to others.

Once enough people understand the deception, the deception will necessarily end.

I also let them know that it is important for them to learn the truth about this because the virus hoax that has been pushed on us is the entire basis for government tyranny against us -- lock downs, isolation, vaccines, face masks, no grocery buying, no fly lists, etc. and all things they would want to do to control the People.

114 days ago
4 score
Reason: None provided.

I have talked to quite a few people about this -- IRL.

I usually throw out "that Covid bullshit we had to deal with" when we are talking about whatever random topic.

Some people ignore. Others pick up on it, so the conversation can continue.

I ask, "What do you think that was all about?"

If I get anything other than "oh, muh science! and muh Fauci" kind of drivel, I will go down that path for a minute or so.

Then I will say, "It's even worse than that. What if I told you the virus didn't even exist?"

Most people will pick up on that, but I can tell that some are already tuned out (like here on GAW, as well).

But some will ask about that, either in a truely inquisitive way, or an ok, buddy, I gotta hear THIS (in a not-so-believing way).

I then say it's a bit of a complex topic, so I can't explain it in 2 minutes, but in less than 10, I can tell you how it has been proven in a lab that viruses do not exist, and how you can control your own heath without worrying about the boogeyman of the virus.

Only if they say sure, tell me, do I then proceed.

I start with the history going back to the late 1800's when bacteria were discovered -- and bacteria are real, but not harmful. They are the clean up crew (janitors) of the biological world.

But back then, they thought that bacteria were harmful. They noticed bacteria in the blood samples of sick people, when viewed under a microscope.

They concluded that the bacteria must have caused the sickness.

Louis Pasteur was the one who came up with Germ Theory, but he was a liar. His own personal journals were found where he admitted he rigged his experiments to get the results he wanted.

They also found that some people were sick but they could not find any bacteria.

So, they concluded that something else, too small to see, must have caused the illness. This is because they had already bought into Germ Theory, which turns out was false all along.

To describe these things they thought existed but could not see, they used the latin word for poison -- virus.

For the next 70 years, they tried to prove that viruses existed, that they caused illness, and that they were transmissible and could make other people sick.

But for 70 years and hundreds of trials with thousands of people, they could never prove any of it.

I talk a little about the Spanish Flu of 1918, where they tried to prove virology but never could. BTW, Spanish Flu was not caused by a virus. It was a poison caused by the massive vaccine campaign, which harmed millions of people.

Then, I talk about the 1950's when virology was all but dead, and Enders came up with a PROCESS to supposedly find viruses.

I then talk about the process to find bacteria, which is valid, and is used all the time to study bacteria and other microorganisms.

BUT ... and here is the big deal ... that process to study microorganism is NOT the process used to study viruses.

The virus process is completely different -- first created by Enders.

And then I talk about the 2021 study by virologist Stefan Lanka, where he proved that what virologists THINK they are looking at is actually nothing more than the harmless artifacts (remnants) of the PROCESS used. Those "spike proteins" are just the dying fragments of dead cells that were killed using the process.

And if you do the EXACT SAME PROCESS ... but DO NOT START WITH ANY BODILY FLUIDS of a human or animal ... you will get THE SAME END RESULT.

This is why the president of Tanzaia was able to send in lab samples for Covid testing and all the samples came back postive for Covid. Only problem was, some of the samples were from a goat, some fruit, and motor oil, but they all came back positive for Covid. Why? Because the samples had human names on the label, and the people doing the testing used a false test that they did not realize was false.

This is because the PROCESS TO STUDY VIRUS by itself CAUSES the positive result. (There's more to it than that, but close enough for an overview).

Those "spike proteins" are said to be the mechanism that allows the virus to get into cells and cause harm.

But those "spike proteins" never actually existed inside the person. How could they, if they are caused outside of the person -- in a lab -- when the process to study the "virus" is used? They are CREATED in the lab during the proess to "find a virus," and they never existed inside the person.

The control -- that most virologists have never used -- was doing the same process but NOT starting with any bodily fluids of a person or animal. Yet, they got the SAME spike proteins. Those are the ejections of dead cell material because the PROCESS is what killed the cells and caused the spike proteins to appear in the electron microscope photos.

They were never inside the person -- or at least, nobody has ever provided any evidence they they were. Therefore, the entire thing is a fraud.

The fraud was started by Enders, and no virologist until 2021 ever thought to reinvestigate the fundamental building blocks of virology by using a control test for the process itself. But once Stefan Lanka did, he proved that the process itself (which is ONLY used for viruses, not any other microorganisms) is what creates those spike proteins -- in the lab -- and they were never inside a person.

This is called the "Cytopathic Effect." The process used to "find a virus" causes the breakdown and death of the monkey kidney cells (viro cells), which results in the ejection of cellular material, which is what is claimed to be the "spike protein" seen in the electron microscope photos.

But those cellular ejections (exosomes) were never inside any person.

If the end result is the ONLY proof that a virologist uses to claim that he has found/studied the virus, but you get the SAME end result even if you don't use any DNA from any human, then clearly the process itself is what caused the result -- they Cytopathic Effect.

At that point, either they have questions (but what about chicken pox or the flu? etc.), or they want to know where they can find more info to learn more (and verify or refute), or they have the thousand-yard stare and obviously have no clue WTF I just said.

It is a lot to take in -- asking someone to re-think something they believed their entire lives, and everyone around them and in the media and the doctors' offices also believes it. Change that mindset in 5 minutes? Hard to do, and yet ...

It's around 30%-50% who show some interest, which means at leaast some of those will eventually understand it themselves, and be able to explain it to others.

Once enough people understand the deception, the deception will necessarily end.

I also let them know that it is important for them to learn the truth about this because the virus hoax that has been pushed on us is the entire basis for government tyranny against us -- lock downs, isolation, vaccines, face masks, no grocery buying, no fly lists, etc. and all things they would want to do to control the People.

114 days ago
4 score
Reason: None provided.

I have talked to quite a few people about this -- IRL.

I usually throw out "that Covid bullshit we had to deal with" when we are talking about whatever random topic.

Some people ignore. Others pick up on it, so the conversation can continue.

I ask, "What do you think that was all about?"

If I get anything other than "oh, muh science! and muh Fauci" kind of drivel, I will go down that path for a minute or so.

Then I will say, "It's even worse than that. What if I told you the virus didn't even exist?"

Most people will pick up on that, but I can tell that some are already tuned out (like here on GAW, as well).

But some will ask about that, either in a truely inquisitive way, or an ok, buddy, I gotta hear THIS (in a not-so-believing way).

I then say it's a bit of a complex topic, so I can't explain it in 2 minutes, but in less than 10, I can tell you how it has been proven in a lab that viruses do not exist, and how you can control your own heath without worrying about the boogeyman of the virus.

Only if they say sure, tell me, do I then proceed.

I start with the history going back to the late 1800's when bacteria were discovered -- and bacteria are real, but not harmful. They are the clean up crew (janitors) of the biological world.

But back then, they thought that bacteria were harmful. They noticed bacteria in the blood samples of sick people, when viewed under a microscope.

They concluded that the bacteria must have caused the sickness.

Louis Pasteur was the one who came up with Germ Theory, but he was a liar. His own personal journals were found where he admitted he rigged his experiements to get the results he wanted.

They also found that some people were sick but they could not find any bacteria.

So, they concluded that something else, too small to see, must have caused the illness. This is because they had already bought into Germ Theory, which turns out was false all along.

To describe these things they thought existed but could not see, they used the latin word for poison -- virus.

For the next 70 years, they tried to prove that viruses existed, that they caused illness, and that they were transmissible and could make other people sick.

But for 70 years and hundreds of trials with thousands of people, they could never prove any of it.

I talk a little about the Spanish Flu of 1918, where they tried to prove virology but never could. BTW, Spanish Flu was not caused by a virus. It was a poison caused by the massive vaccine campaign, which harmed millions of people.

Then, I talk about the 1950's when virology was all but dead, and Enders came up with a PROCESS to supposedly find viruses.

I then talk about the process to find bacteria, which is valid, and is used all the time to study bacteria and other microorganisms.

BUT ... and here is the big deal ... that process to study microorganism is NOT the process used to study viruses.

The virus process is completely different -- first created by Enders.

And then I talk about the 2021 study by virologist Stefan Lanka, where he proved that what virologists THINK they are looking at is actually nothing more than the harmless artifacts (remnants) of the PROCESS used. Those "spike proteins" are just the dying fragments of dead cells that were killed using the process.

And if you do the EXACT SAME PROCESS ... but DO NOT START WITH ANY BODILY FLUIDS of a human or animal ... you will get THE SAME END RESULT.

This is why the president of Tanzaia was able to send in lab samples for Covid testing and all the samples came back postive for Covid. Only problem was, some of the samples were from a goat, some fruit, and motor oil, but they all came back positive for Covid. Why? Because the samples had human names on the label, and the people doing the testing used a false test that they did not realize was false.

This is because the PROCESS TO STUDY VIRUS by itself CAUSES the positive result. (There's more to it than that, but close enough for an overview).

Those "spike proteins" are said to be the mechanism that allows the virus to get into cells and cause harm.

But those "spike proteins" never actually existed inside the person. How could they, if they are caused outside of the person -- in a lab -- when the process to study the "virus" is used? They are CREATED in the lab during the proess to "find a virus," and they never existed inside the person.

The control -- that most virologists have never used -- was doing the same process but NOT starting with any bodily fluids of a person or animal. Yet, they got the SAME spike proteins. Those are the ejections of dead cell material because the PROCESS is what killed the cells and caused the spike proteins to appear in the electron microscope photos.

They were never inside the person -- or at least, nobody has ever provided any evidence they they were. Therefore, the entire thing is a fraud.

The fraud was started by Enders, and no virologist until 2021 ever thought to reinvestigate the fundamental building blocks of virology by using a control test for the process itself. But once Stefan Lanka did, he proved that the process itself (which is ONLY used for viruses, not any other microorganisms) is what creates those spike proteins -- in the lab -- and they were never inside a person.

This is called the "Cytopathic Effect." The process used to "find a virus" causes the breakdown and death of the monkey kidney cells (viro cells), which results in the ejection of cellular material, which is what is claimed to be the "spike protein" seen in the electron microscope photos.

But those cellular ejections (exosomes) were never inside any person.

If the end result is the ONLY proof that a virologist uses to claim that he has found/studied the virus, but you get the SAME end result even if you don't use any DNA from any human, then clearly the process itself is what caused the result -- they Cytopathic Effect.

At that point, either they have questions (but what about chicken pox or the flu? etc.), or they want to know where they can find more info to learn more (and verify or refute), or they have the thousand-yard stare and obviously have no clue WTF I just said.

It is a lot to take in -- asking someone to re-think something they believed their entire lives, and everyone around them and in the media and the doctors' offices also believes it. Change that mindset in 5 minutes? Hard to do, and yet ...

It's around 30%-50% who show some interest, which means at leaast some of those will eventually understand it themselves, and be able to explain it to others.

Once enough people understand the deception, the deception will necessarily end.

I also let them know that it is important for them to learn the truth about this because the virus hoax that has been pushed on us is the entire basis for government tyranny against us -- lock downs, isolation, vaccines, face masks, no grocery buying, no fly lists, etc. and all things they would want to do to control the People.

114 days ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

I have talked to quite a few people about this -- IRL.

I usually throw out "that Covid bullshit we had to deal with" when we are talking about whatever random topic.

Some people ignore. Others pick up on it, so the conversation can continue.

I ask, "What do you think that was all about?"

If I get anything other than "oh, muh science! and muh Fauci" kind of drivel, I will go down that path for a minute or so.

Then I will say, "It's even worse than that. What if I told you the virus didn't even exist?"

Most people will pick up on that, but I can tell that some are already tuned out (like here on GAW, as well).

But some will ask about that, either in a truely inquisitive way, or an ok, buddy, I gotta hear THIS (in a not-so-believing way).

I then say it's a bit of a complex topic, so I can't explain it in 2 minutes, but in less than 10, I can tell you how it has been proven in a lab that viruses do not exist, and how you can control your own heath without worrying about the boogeyman of the virus.

Only if they say sure, tell me, do I then proceed.

I start with the history going back to the late 1800's when bacteria were discovered -- and bacteria are real, but not harmful. They are the clean up crew (janitors) of the biological world.

But back then, they thought that bacteria were harmful. They noticed bacteria in the blood samples of sick people, when viewed under a microscope.

They concluded that the bacteria must have caused the sickness.

Louis Pasteur was the one who came up with Germ Theory, but he was a liar. His own personal journals were found where he admitted he rigged his experiements to get the results he wanted.

They also found that some people were sick but they could not find any bacteria.

So, they concluded that something else, too small to see, must have caused the illness. This is because they had already bought into Germ Theory, which turns out was false all along.

To describe these things they thought existed but could not see, they used the latin word for poison -- virus.

For the next 70 years, they tried to prove that viruses existed, that they caused illness, and that they were transmissible and could make other people sick.

But for 70 years and hundreds of trials with thousands of people, they could never prove any of it.

I talk a little about the Spanish Flu of 1918, where they tried to prove virology but never could. BTW, Spanish Flu was not caused by a virus. It was a poison caused by the massive vaccine campaign, which harmed millions of people.

Then, I talk about the 1950's when virology was all but dead, and Enders came up with a PROCESS to supposedly find viruses.

I then talk about the process to find bacteria, which is valid, and is used all the time to study bacteria and other microorganisms.

BUT ... and here is the big deal ... that process to study microorganism is NOT the process used to study viruses.

The virus process is completely different -- first created by Enders.

And then I talk about the 2021 study by virologist Stefan Lanka, where he proved that what virologists THINK they are looking at is actually nothing more than the harmless artifacts (remnants) of the PROCESS used. Those "spike proteins" are just the dying fragments of dead cells that were killed using the process.

And if you do the EXACT SAME PROCESS ... but DO NOT START WITH ANY BODILY FLUIDS of a human or animal ... you will get THE SAME END RESULT.

This is why the president of Tanzaia was able to send in lab samples for Covid testing and all the samples came back postive for Covid. Only problem was, some of the samples were from a goat, some fruit, and motor oil, but they all came back positive for Covid. Why? Because the samples had human names on the label, and the people doing the testing used a false test that they did not realize was false.

This is because the PROCESS TO STUDY VIRUS by itself CAUSES the positive result. (There's more to it than that, but close enough for an overview).

Those "spike proteins" are said to be the mechanism that allows the virus to get into cells and cause harm.

But those "spike proteins" never actually existed inside the person. How could they, if they are caused outside of the person -- in a lab -- when the process to study the "virus" is used? They are CREATED in the lab during the proess to "find a virus," and they never existed inside the person.

The control -- that most virologists have never used -- was doing the same process but NOT starting with any bodily fluids of a person or animal. Yet, they got the SAME spike proteins. Those are the ejections of dead cell material because the PROCESS is what killed the cells and caused the spike proteins to appear in the electron microscope photos.

They were never inside the person -- or at least, nobody has ever provided any evidence they they were. Therefore, the entire thing is a fraud.

The fraud was started by Enders, and no virologist until 2021 ever thought to reinvestigate the fundamental building blocks of virology by using a control test for the process itself. But once Stefan Lanka did, he proved that the process itself (which is ONLY used for viruses, not any other microorganisms) is what creates those spike proteins -- in the lab -- and they were never inside a person.

At that point, either they have questions (but what about chicken pox or the flu? etc.), or they want to know where they can find more info to learn more (and verify or refute), or they have the thousand-yard stare and obviously have no clue WTF I just said.

It is a lot to take in -- asking someone to re-think something they believed their entire lives, and everyone around them and in the media and the doctors' offices also believes it. Change that mindset in 5 minutes? Hard to do, and yet ...

It's around 30%-50% who show some interest, which means at leaast some of those will eventually understand it themselves, and be able to explain it to others.

Once enough people understand the deception, the deception will necessarily end.

I also let them know that it is important for them to learn the truth about this because the virus hoax that has been pushed on us is the entire basis for government tyranny against us -- lock downs, isolation, vaccines, face masks, no grocery buying, no fly lists, etc. and all things they would want to do to control the People.

114 days ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

I have talked to quite a few people about this -- IRL.

I usually throw out "that Covid bullshit we had to deal with" when we are talking about whatever random topic.

Some people ignore. Others pick up on it, so the conversation can continue.

I ask, "What do you think that was all about?"

If I get anything other than "oh, muh science! and muh Fauci" kind of drivel, I will go down that path for a minute or so.

Then I will say, "It's even worse than that. What if I told you the virus didn't even exist?"

Most people will pick up on that, but I can tell that some are already tuned out (like here on GAW, as well).

But some will ask about that, either in a truely inquisitive way, or an ok, buddy, I gotta hear THIS (in a not-so-believing way).

I then say it's a bit of a complex topic, so I can't explain it in 2 minutes, but in less than 10, I can tell you how it has been proven in a lab that viruses do not exist, and how you can control your own heath without worrying about the boogeyman of the virus.

Only if they say sure, tell me, do I then proceed.

I start with the history going back to the late 1800's when bacteria were discovered -- and bacteria are real, but not harmful. They are the clean up crew (janitors) of the biological world.

But back then, they thought that bacteria were harmful. They noticed bacteria in the blood samples of sick people, when viewed under a microscope.

They concluded that the bacteria must have caused the sickness.

Louis Pasteur was the one who came up with Germ Theory, but he was a liar. His own personal journals were found where he admitted he rigged his experiements to get the results he wanted.

They also found that some people were sick but they could not find any bacteria.

So, they concluded that something else, too small to see, must have caused the illness. This is because they had already bought into Germ Theory, which turns out was false all along.

To describe these things they thought existed but could not see, they used the latin word for poison -- virus.

For the next 70 years, they tried to prove that viruses existed, that they caused illness, and that they were transmissible and could make other people sick.

But for 70 years and hundreds of trials with thousands of people, they could never prove any of it.

I talk a little about the Spanish Flu of 1918, where they tried to prove virology but never could. BTW, Spanish Flu was not caused by a virus. It was a poison caused by the massive vaccine campaign, which harmed millions of people.

Then, I talk about the 1950's when virology was all but dead, and Enders came up with a PROCESS to supposedly find viruses.

I then talk about the process to find bacteria, which is valid, and is used all the time to study bacteria and other microorganisms.

BUT ... and here is the big deal ... that process to study microorganism is NOT the process used to study viruses.

The virus process is completely different -- first created by Enders.

And then I talk about the 2021 study by virologist Stefan Lanka, where he proved that what virologists THINK they are looking at is actually nothing more than the harmless artifacts (remnants) of the PROCESS used. Those "spike proteins" are just the dying fragments of dead cells that were killed using the process.

And if you do the EXACT SAME PROCESS ... but DO NOT START WITH ANY BODILY FLUIDS of a human or animal ... you will get THE SAME END RESULT.

This is why the president of Tanzaia was able to send in lab samples for Covid testing and all the samples came back postive for Covid. Only problem was, some of the samples were from a goat, some fruit, and motor oil, but they all came back positive for Covid. Why? Because the samples had human names on the label, and the people doing the testing used a false test that they did not realize was false.

This is because the PROCESS TO STUDY VIRUSES by itself CAUSES the positive result. (There's more to it than that, but close enough for an overview).

Those "spike proteins" are said to be the mechanism that allows the virus to get into cells can cause harm.

But those "spike proteins" never actually existed inside the person. How could they, if they are caused outside of the person when the process to study them is used? They are CREATED in the lab during the proess to "find a virus," and never existed inside the person.

The control -- that most virologists never use -- was doing the same process but NOT starting with any bodily fluids of a person or animal. Yet, they got the SAME spike proteins. Those are the ejection of dead cell material because the PROCESS is what killed the cells and caused the spike proteins to appear in the electron microscope photos.

They were never in the person -- or at least, nobody has ever provided any evidence they they do. Therefore, the entire thing is a fraud. The fraud was started by Enders, and no virologist until 2021 ever thought to reinvestigate the fundamental building blocks of virology by using a control for the process itself. But once Stefan Lanka did, he proved that the process itself (which is ONLY used for viruses) is what creates those spike proteins -- in the lab, but they were never inside a person.

At that point, either they have questions (but what about chicken pox or the flu? etc.), or they want to know where they can find more info to learn more (and verify or refute), or they have the thousand-yard stare and obviously have no clue WTF I just said.

It is a lot to take in -- asking someone to re-think something they believed their entire lives, and everyone around them and in the media and the doctors' offices also believes it. Change that mindset in 5 minutes? Hard to do, and yet ...

It's around 30%-50% who show some interest, which means at leaast some of those will eventually understand it themselves, and be able to explain it to others.

Once enough people understand the deception, the deception will necessarily end.

I also let them know that it is important for them to learn the truth about this because the virus hoax that has been pushed on us is the entire basis for government tyranny against us -- lock downs, isolation, vaccines, face masks, no grocery buying, no fly lists, etc. and all things they would want to do to control the People.

114 days ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

I have talked to quite a few people about this -- IRL.

I usually throw out "that Covid bullshit we had to deal with" when we are talking about whatever random topic.

Some people ignore. Others pick up on it, so the conversation can continue.

I ask, "What do you think that was all about?"

If I get anything other than "oh, muh science! and muh Fauci" kind of drivel, I will go down that path for a minute or so.

Then I will say, "It's even worse than that. What if I told you the virus didn't even exist?"

Most people will pick up on that, but I can tell that some are already tuned out (like here on GAW, as well).

But some will ask about that, either in a truely inquisitive way, or an ok, buddy, I gotta hear THIS (in a not-so-believing way).

I then say it's a bit of a complex topic, so I can't explain it in 2 minutes, but in less than 10, I can tell you how it has been proven in a lab that viruses do not exist, and how you can control your own heath without worrying about the boogeyman of the virus.

Only if they say sure, tell me, do I then proceed.

I start with the history going back to the 1800's when bacteria were discovered -- and bacteria are real, but not harmful. They are the clean up crew (janitors) of the biological world.

But back then, they thought that bacteria were harmful. They noticed bacteria in the blood samples of sick people, when viewed under a microscope.

They concluded that the bacteria must have caused the sickness.

Louis Pasteur was the one who came up with Germ Theory, but he was a liar. His own personal journals were found where he admitted he rigged his experiements to get the results he wanted.

They also found that some people were sick but they could not find any bacteria.

So, they concluded that something else, too small to see, must have caused the illness. This is because they had already bought into Germ Theory, which turns out was false all along.

To describe these things they thought existed but could not see, they used the latin word for poison -- virus.

For the next 70 years, they tried to prove that viruses existed, that they caused illness, and that they were transmissible and could make other people sick.

But for 70 years and hundreds of trials with thousands of people, they could never prove any of it.

I talk a little about the Spanish Flu of 1918, where they tried to prove virology but never could. BTW, Spanish Flu was not caused by a virus. It was a poison caused by the massive vaccine campaign, which harmed millions of people.

Then, I talk about the 1950's when virology was all but dead, and Enders came up with a PROCESS to supposedly find viruses.

I then talk about the process to find bacteria, which is valid, and is used all the time to study bacteria and other microorganisms.

BUT ... and here is the big deal ... that process to study microorganism is NOT the process used to study viruses.

The virus process is completely different -- first created by Enders.

And then I talk about the 2021 study by virologist Stefan Lanka, where he proved that what virologists THINK they are looking at is actually nothing more than the harmless artifacts (remnants) of the PROCESS used. Those "spike proteins" are just the dying fragments of dead cells that were killed using the process.

And if you do the EXACT SAME PROCESS ... but DO NOT START WITH ANY BODILY FLUIDS of a human or animal ... you will get THE SAME END RESULT.

This is why the president of Tanzaia was able to send in lab samples for Covid testing and all the samples came back postive for Covid. Only problem was, some of the samples were from a goat, some fruit, and motor oil, but they all came back positive for Covid. Why? Because the samples had human names on the label, and the people doing the testing used a false test that they did not realize was false.

This is because the PROCESS TO STUDY VIRUSES by itself CAUSES the positive result. (There's more to it than that, but close enough for an overview).

Those "spike proteins" are said to be the mechanism that allows the virus to get into cells can cause harm.

But those "spike proteins" never actually existed inside the person. How could they, if they are caused outside of the person when the process to study them is used? They are CREATED in the lab during the proess to "find a virus," and never existed inside the person.

The control -- that most virologists never use -- was doing the same process but NOT starting with any bodily fluids of a person or animal. Yet, they got the SAME spike proteins. Those are the ejection of dead cell material because the PROCESS is what killed the cells and caused the spike proteins to appear in the electron microscope photos.

They were never in the person -- or at least, nobody has ever provided any evidence they they do. Therefore, the entire thing is a fraud. The fraud was started by Enders, and no virologist until 2021 ever thought to reinvestigate the fundamental building blocks of virology by using a control for the process itself. But once Stefan Lanka did, he proved that the process itself (which is ONLY used for viruses) is what creates those spike proteins -- in the lab, but they were never inside a person.

At that point, either they have questions (but what about chicken pox or the flu? etc.), or they want to know where they can find more info to learn more (and verify or refute), or they have the thousand-yard stare and obviously have no clue WTF I just said.

It is a lot to take in -- asking someone to re-think something they believed their entire lives, and everyone around them and in the media and the doctors' offices also believes it. Change that mindset in 5 minutes? Hard to do, and yet ...

It's around 30%-50% who show some interest, which means at leaast some of those will eventually understand it themselves, and be able to explain it to others.

Once enough people understand the deception, the deception will necessarily end.

I also let them know that it is important for them to learn the truth about this because the virus hoax that has been pushed on us is the entire basis for government tyranny against us -- lock downs, isolation, vaccines, face masks, no grocery buying, no fly lists, etc. and all things they would want to do to control the People.

114 days ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

I have talked to quite a few people about this -- IRL.

I usually throw out "that Covid bullshit we had to deal with" when we are talking about whatever random topic.

Some people ignore. Others pick up on it, so the conversation can continue.

I ask, "What do you think that was all about?"

If I get anything other than "oh, muh science! and muh Fauci" kind of drivel, I will go down that path for a minute or so.

Then I will say, "It's even worse than that. What if I told you the virus didn't even exist?"

Most people will pick up on that, but I can tell that some are already tuned out (like here on GAW, as well).

But some will ask about that, either in a truely inquisitive way, or an ok, buddy, I gotta hear THIS (in a not-so-believing way).

I then say it's a bit of a complex topic, so I can't explain it in 2 minutes, but in less than 10, I can tell you how it has been proven in a lab that viruses do not exist, and how you can control your own heath without worrying about the boogeyman of the virus.

Only if they say sure, tell me, do I then proceed.

I start with the history going back to the 1800's when bacteria were discovered -- and bacteria are real, but not harmful. They are the clean up crew (janitors) of the biological world.

But back then, they thought that bacteria were harmful. They noticed bacteria in the blood samples of sick people, when viewed under a microscope.

They concluded that the bacteria must have caused the sickness.

Louis Pasteur was the one who came up with Germ Theory, but he was a liar. His own personal journals were found where he admitted he rigged his experiements to get the results he wanted.

They also found that some people were sick but they could not find any bacteria.

So, they concluded that something else, too small to see, must have caused the illness. This is because they had already bought into Germ Theory, which turns out was false all along.

To describe these things they thought existed but could not see, they used the latin word for poison -- virus.

For the next 70 years, they tried to prove that viruses existed, that they caused illness, and that they were transmissible and could make other people sick.

But for 70 years and hundreds of trials with thousands of people, they could never prove any of it.

I talk a little about the Spanish Flu of 1918, where they tried to prove virology but never could. BTW, Spanish Flu was not caused by a virus. It was a poison caused by the massive vaccine campaign, which harmed millions of people.

Then, I talk about the 1950's when virology was all but dead, and Enders came up with a PROCESS to supposedly find viruses.

I then talk about the process to find bacteria, which is valid, and is used all the time to study bacteria and other microorganisms.

BUT ... and here is the big deal ... that process to study microorganism is NOT the process used to study viruses.

The virus process is completely different -- first created by Enders.

And then I talk about the 2021 study by virologist Stefan Lanka, where he proved that what virologists THINK they are looking at is actually nothing more than the harmless artifacts (remnants) of the PROCESS used. Those "spike proteins" are just the dying fragments of dead cells that were killed using the process.

And if you do the EXACT SAME PROCESS ... but DO NOT START WITH ANY BODILY FLUIDS of a human or animal ... you will get THE SAME END RESULT.

This is why the president of Tanzaia was able to send in lab samples for Covid testing and all the samples came back postive for Covid. Only problem was, some of the samples were from a goat, some fruit, and motor oil, but they all came back positive for Covid. Why? Because the samples had human names on the label, and the people doing the testing used a false test that they did not realize was false.

This is because the PROCESS TO STUDY VIRUSES by itself CAUSES the positive result. (There's more to it than that, but close enough for an overview).

Those "spike proteins" are said to be the mechanism that allows the virus to get into cells can cause harm.

But those "spike proteins" never actually existed inside the person. How could they, if they are caused outside of the person when the process to study them is used? They are CREATED in the lab during the proess to "find a virus," and never existed inside the person.

The control -- that most virologists never use -- was doing the same process but NOT starting with any bodily fluids of a person or animal. Yet, they got the SAME spike proteins. Those are the ejection of dead cell material because the PROCESS is what killed the cells and caused the spike proteins to appear in the electron microscope photos.

They were never in the person -- or at least, nobody has ever provided any evidence they they do. Therefore, the entire thing is a fraud. The fraud was started by Enders, and no virologist until 2021 ever thought to reinvestigate the fundamental building blocks of virology by using a control for the process itself. But once Stefan Lanka did, he proved that the process itself (which is ONLY used for viruses) is what creates those spike proteins -- in the lab, but they were never inside a person.

At that point, either they have questions (but what about chicken pox or the flu? etc.), or they want to know where they can find more info to learn more (and verify or refute), or they have the thousand-yard stare and obviously have no clue WTF I just said.

It is a lot to take in -- asking someone to re-think something they believed their entire lives, and everyone around them and in the media and the doctors' offices also believes it. Change that mindset in 5 minutes? Hard to do, and yet ...

It's around 30%-50% who show some interest, which means at leaast some of those will eventually understand it themselves, and be able to explain it to others.

Once enough people understand the deception, the deception will necessarily end.

I also let them know that it is important for them to learn the truth about this because the fraud pushed on us is the entire basis for government tyranny against us -- lock downs, isolation, vaccines, face masks, no grocery buying, no fly lists, etc. and all things they would want to do to control the People.

114 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I have talked to quite a few people about this -- IRL.

I usually throw out "that Covid bullshit we had to deal with" when we are talking about whatever random topic.

Some people ignore. Others pick up on it, so the conversation can continue.

I ask, "What do you think that was all about?"

If I get anything other than "oh, muh science! and muh Fauci" kind of drivel, I will go down that path for a minute or so.

Then I will say, "It's even worse than that. What if I told you the virus didn't even exist?"

Most people will pick up on that, but I can tell that some are already tuned out (like here on GAW, as well).

But some will ask about that, either in a truely inquisitive way, or an ok, buddy, I gotta hear THIS (in a not-so-believing way).

I then say it's a bit of a complex topic, so I can't explain it in 2 minutes, but in less than 10, I can tell you how it has been proven in a lab that viruses do not exist, and how you can control your own heath without worrying about the boogeyman of the virus.

Only if they say sure, tell me, do I then proceed.

I start with the history going back to the 1800's when bacteria were discovered -- and bacteria are real, but not harmful. They are the clean up crew (janitors) of the biological world.

But back then, they thought that bacteria were harmful. They noticed bacteria in the blood samples of sick people, when viewed under a microscope.

They concluded that the bacteria must have caused the sickness.

Louis Pasteur was the one who came up with Germ Theory, but he was a liar. His own personal journals were found where he admitted he rigged his experiements to get the results he wanted.

They also found that some people were sick but they could not find any bacteria.

So, they concluded that something else, too small to see, must have caused the illness. This is because they had already bought into Germ Theory, which turns out was false all along.

To describe these things they thought existed but could not see, they used the latin word for poison -- virus.

For the next 70 years, they tried to prove that viruses existed, that they caused illness, and that they were transmissible and could make other people sick.

But for 70 years and hundreds of trials with thousands of people, they could never prove any of it.

I talk a little about the Spanish Flu of 1918, where they tried to prove virology but never could. BTW, Spanish Flu was not caused by a virus. It was a poison caused by the massive vaccine campaign, which harmed millions of people.

Then, I talk about the 1950's when virology was all but dead, and Enders came up with a PROCESS to supposedly find viruses.

I then talk about the process to find bacteria, which is valid, and is used all the time to study bacteria and other microorganisms.

BUT ... and here is the big deal ... that process to study microorganism is NOT the process used to study viruses.

The virus process is completely different -- first created by Enders.

And then I talk about the 2021 study by virologist Stefan Lanka, where he proved that what virologists THINK they are looking at is actually nothing more than the harmless artifacts (remnants) of the PROCESS used. Those "spike proteins" are just the dying fragments of dead cells that were killed using the process.

And if you do the EXACT SAME PROCESS ... but DO NOT START WITH ANY BODILY FLUIDS of a human or animal ... you will get THE SAME END RESULT.

This is why the president of Tanzaia was able to send in lab samples for Covid testing and all the samples came back postive for Covid. Only problem was, some of the samples were from a goat, some fruit, and motor oil, but they all came back positive for Covid. Why? Because the samples had human names on the label, and the people doing the testing used a false test that they did not realize was false.

This is because the PROCESS TO STUDY VIRUSES by itself CAUSES the positive result. (There's more to it than that, but close enough for an overview).

At that point, either they have questions (but what about chicken pox or the flu? etc.), or they want to know where they can find more info to learn more (and verify or refute), or they have the thousand-yard stare and obviously have no clue WTF I just said.

It's around 30%-50% who show some interest, which means at leaast some of those will eventually understand it themselves, and be able to explain it to others.

Once enough people understand the deception, the deception will necessarily end.

I also let them know that it is important for them to learn the truth about this because the fraud pushed on us is the entire basis for government tyranny against us -- lock downs, isolation, vaccines, face masks, no grocery buying, no fly lists, etc. and all things they would want to do to control the People.

114 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I have talked to quite a few people about this -- IRL.

I usually throw out "that Covid bullshit we had to deal with" when we are talking about whatever random topic.

Some people ignore. Others pick up on it, so the conversation can continue.

I ask, "What do you think that was all about?"

If I get anything other than "oh, muh science! and muh Fauci" kind of drivel, I will go down that path for a minute or so.

Then I will say, "It's even worse than that. What if I told you the virus didn't even exist?"

Most people will pick up on that, but I can tell that some are already tuned out (like here on GAW, as well).

But some will ask about that, either in a truely inquisitive way, or an ok, buddy, I gotta hear THIS (in a not-so-believing way).

I then say it's a bit of a complex topic, so I can't explain it in 2 minutes, but in less than 10, I can tell you how it has been proven in a lab that viruses do not exist, and how you can control your own heath without worrying about the boogeyman of the virus.

Only if they say sure, tell me, do I then proceed.

I start with the history going back to the 1800's when bacteria were discovered -- and bacteria are real, but not harmful. They are the clean up crew (janitors) of the biological world.

But back then, they thought that bacteria were harmful. They noticed bacteria in the blood samples of sick people, when viewed under a microscope.

They concluded that the bacteria must have caused the sickness.

Louis Pasteur was the one who came up with Germ Theory, but he was a liar. His own personal journals were found where he admitted he rigged his experiements to get the results he wanted.

They also found that some people were sick but they could not find any bacteria.

So, they concluded that something else, too small to see, must have caused the illness. This is because they had already bought into Germ Theory, which turns out was false all along.

To describe these things they thought existed but could not see, they used the latin word for poison -- virus.

For the next 70 years, they tried to prove that viruses existed, that they caused illness, and that they were transmissible and could make other people sick.

But for 70 years and hundreds of trials with thousands of people, they could never prove any of it.

I talk a little about the Spanish Flu of 1918, where they tried to prove virology but never could. BTW, Spanish Flu was not caused by a virus. It was a poison caused by the massive vaccine campaign, which harmed millions of people.

Then, I talk about the 1950's when virology was all but dead, and Enders came up with a PROCESS to supposedly find viruses.

I then talk about the process to find bacteria, which is valid, and is used all the time to study bacteria and other microorganisms.

BUT ... and here is the big deal ... that process to study microorganism is NOT the process used to study viruses.

The virus process is completely different -- first created by Enders.

And then I talk about the 2021 study by virologist Stefan Lanka, where he proved that what virologists THINK they are looking at is actually nothing more than the harmless artifacts (remnants) of the PROCESS used. Those "spike proteins" are just the dying fragments of dead cells that were killed using the process.

And if you do the EXACT SAME PROCESS ... but DO NOT START WITH ANY BODILY FLUIDS of a human or animal ... you will get THE SAME END RESULT.

This is why the president of Tanzaia was able to send in lab samples for Covid testing and all the samples came back postive for Covid. Only proble was, some o the samples were from a goat, some fruit, and motor oil, but they all came back positive for Covid. Why? Because the samples had human names on the label, and the people doing the testing used a false test that they did not realize was false.

This is because the PROCESS TO STUDY VIRUSES by itself CAUSES the positive result. (There's more to it than that, but close enough for an overview).

At that point, either they have questions (but what about chicken pox or the flu? etc.), or they want to know where they can find more info to learn more (and verify or refute), or they have the thousand-yard stare and obviously have no clue WTF I just said.

It's around 30%-50% who show some interest, which means at leaast some of those will eventually understand it themselves, and be able to explain it to others.

Once enough people understand the deception, the deception will necessarily end.

I also let them know that it is important for them to learn the truth about this because the fraud pushed on us is the entire basis for government tyranny against us -- lock downs, isolation, vaccines, face masks, no grocery buying, no fly lists, etc. and all things they would want to do to control the People.

114 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I have talked to quite a few people about this -- IRL.

I usually throw out "that Covid bullshit we had to deal with" when we are talking about whatever random topic.

Some people ignore. Others pick up on it, so the conversation can continue.

I ask, "What do you think that was all about?"

If I get anything other than "oh, muh science! and muh Fauci" kind of drivel, I will go down that path for a minute or so.

Then I will say, "It's even worse than that. What if I told you the virus didn't even exist?"

Most people will pick up on that, but I can tell that some are already tuned out (like here on GAW, as well).

But some will ask about that, either in a truely inquisitive way, or an ok, buddy, I gotta hear THIS (in a not-so-believing way).

I then say it's a bit of a complex topic, so I can't explain it in 2 minutes, but in less than 10, I can tell you how it has been proven in a lab that viruses do not exist, and how you can control your own heath without worrying about the boogeyman of the virus.

Only if they say sure, tell me, do I then proceed.

I start with the history going back to the 1800's when bacteria were discovered -- and bacteria are real, but not harmful. They are the clean up crew (janitors) of the biological world.

But back then, they thought that bacteria were harmful. They noticed bacteria in the blood samples of sick people, when viewed under a microscope.

The concluded that the bacteria must have caused the sickness.

Louis Pasteur was the one who came up with Germ Theory, but he was a liar. His own personal journals were found where he admitted he rigged his experiements to get the results he wanted.

They also found that some people were sick but they could not find any bacteria.

So, they concluded that something else, too small to see, must have caused the illness. This is because they had already bought into Germ Theory, which turns out was false all along.

To describe these things they thought existed but could not see, they used the latin word for poison -- virus.

For the next 70 years, they tried to prove that viruses existed, that they caused illness, and that they were transmissible and could make other people sick.

But for 70 years and hundreds of trials with thousands of people, they could never prove any of it.

I talk a little about the Spanish Flu of 1918, where they tried to prove virology but never could. BTW, Spanish Flu was not caused by a virus. It was a poison caused by the massive vaccine campaign, which harmed millions of people.

Then, I talk about the 1950's when virology was all but dead, and Enders came up with a PROCESS to supposedly find viruses.

I then talk about the process to find bacteria, which is valid, and is used all the time to study bacteria and other microorganisms.

BUT ... and here is the big deal ... that process to study microorganism is NOT the process used to study viruses.

The virus process is completely different -- first created by Enders.

And then I talk about the 2021 study by virologist Stefan Lanka, where he proved that what virologists THINK they are looking at is actually nothing more than the harmless artifacts (remnants) of the PROCESS used. Those "spike proteins" are just the dying fragments of dead cells that were killed using the process.

And if you do the EXACT SAME PROCESS ... but DO NOT START WITH ANY BODILY FLUIDS of a human or animal ... you will get THE SAME END RESULT.

This is why the president of Tanzaia was able to send in lab samples for Covid testing and all the samples came back postive for Covid. Only proble was, some o the samples were from a goat, some fruit, and motor oil, but they all came back positive for Covid. Why? Because the samples had human names on the label, and the people doing the testing used a false test that they did not realize was false.

This is because the PROCESS TO STUDY VIRUSES by itself CAUSES the positive result. (There's more to it than that, but close enough for an overview).

At that point, either they have questions (but what about chicken pox or the flu? etc.), or they want to know where they can find more info to learn more (and verify or refute), or they have the thousand-yard stare and obviously have no clue WTF I just said.

It's around 30%-50% who show some interest, which means at leaast some of those will eventually understand it themselves, and be able to explain it to others.

Once enough people understand the deception, the deception will necessarily end.

I also let them know that it is important for them to learn the truth about this because the fraud pushed on us is the entire basis for government tyranny against us -- lock downs, isolation, vaccines, face masks, no grocery buying, no fly lists, etc. and all things they would want to do to control the People.

114 days ago
1 score