Obviously contagious diseases exist. But if they were spread by particles, masks would work.

Your second sentence is true, which should make you re-evaluate your first sentence.

PCR cycles were cranked up above 40 instead of at 25, causing over 90% false positives- and that those tests themselves were never actually based on an isolated virus, but rather components of influenza and cold.

PCR actually CREATES a lot of DNA sequences. Creates things that were never in the original sample.

This is why cranking up the cycles is sure to eventually create enough small DNA fragments that a computer program will piece enough of them together to "match" something bad in the "Bad Stuff Database."

Fewer cycles means fewer fragments created, which means no "match" to the bad stuff.

This is how they manipulated "Covid cases."

Ramp up the PCR cycles and you will get more "matches" and therefore more "cases."

Roll out the vaxx, and then reduce the PCR cycles, and you will get fewer "matches" and therefore fewer "cases," thereby ... "proving" that the vaxx saved the world !!!

I am not a DeSantis fan, but he has done some good things. One thing he did in 2020 was require testing labs to disclose how many PCR cycles they used to arrive at their result.

And what do ya know? Immediately thereafter, "Covid cases" in Florida dropped a bunch. Wow. Shocking.

I don't know who gave him the idea to do that, but someone might have known something.

Isolated viruses themselves have never been proven to cause disease

Even worse, no virus has ever been isolated. The word "isolated" is misused by the fraudsters by re-defining the term.

"Gay" used to mean happy, now it means faggot.

"Vaccine" used to mean injecting a "live virus" (no such thing, it turns out) to protect against future infection. Now, it means injecting something into someone to reduce symptoms ... or "cases."

"Isolate" used to mean (and really still does) to separate from all other things. But to virologists, it means mixing it with other things, using a bogus process, and claiming that the end result proves the virus is real. If they take a sample from one person, they call that isolation because it was from one person. This is really dumb, but that's what they do.

Remdesivir plus ventilators were the primary culprit in putting people who checked into the hospital with moderate symptoms into an early grave in a matter of hours.

Probably true. And almost everyone who "died of Covid" did so in a hospital. Nobody just dropped dead in a classroom or on a football field -- until the vaxx rollout.

And people had to be tested to know whether they were sick.

Thus, helping to create more "cases."

Science must be infinitely repeatable with consistent results.

True. But what passes for science today rarely ever uses the Scientific Method. Instead, they use "expert consensus" and "peer review" and "trust the science" and other such propaganda.

The systematic application of reason and real-world testing has been roundly applied to the theory of diseases and vaccines, and they are both so full of holes, there is nothing of value contained therein.

BINGO.

Obviously contagious diseases exist. But if they were spread by particles, masks would work.

Your second sentence is true, which should make you re-evaluate your first sentence.

PCR cycles were cranked up above 40 instead of at 25, causing over 90% false positives- and that those tests themselves were never actually based on an isolated virus, but rather components of influenza and cold.

PCR actually CREATES a lot of DNA sequences. Creates things that were never in the original sample.

This is why cranking up the cycles is sure to eventually create enough small DNA fragments that a computer program will piece enough of them together to "match" something bad.

Fewer cycles means fewer fragments created, which means no "match" to the bad stuff.

This is how they manipulated "Covid cases."

Ramp up the PCR cycles and you will get more "matches" and therefore more "cases."

Roll out the vaxx, and then reduce the PCR cycles, and you will get fewer "matches" and therefore fewer "cases," thereby ... "proving" that the vaxx saved the world !!!

I am not a DeSantis fan, but he has done some good things. One thing he did in 2020 was require testing labs to disclose how many PCR cycles they used to arrive at their result.

And what do ya know? Immediately thereafter, "Covid cases" in Florida dropped a bunch. Wow. Shocking.

I don't know who gave him the idea to do that, but someone might have known something.

Isolated viruses themselves have never been proven to cause disease

Even worse, no virus has ever been isolated. The word "isolated" is misused by the fraudsters by re-defining the term.

"Gay" used to mean happy, now it means faggot.

"Vaccine" used to mean injecting a "live virus" (no such thing, it turns out) to protect against future infection. Now, it means injecting something into someone to reduce symptoms ... or "cases."

"Isolate" used to mean (and really still does) to separate from all other things. But to virologists, it means mixing it with other things, using a bogus process, and claiming that the end result proves the virus is real. If they take a sample from one person, they call that isolation because it was from one person. This is really dumb, but that's what they do.

Remdesivir plus ventilators were the primary culprit in putting people who checked into the hospital with moderate symptoms into an early grave in a matter of hours.

Probably true. And almost everyone who "died of Covid" did so in a hospital. Nobody just dropped dead in a classroom or on a football field -- until the vaxx rollout.

And people had to be tested to know whether they were sick.

Thus, helping to create more "cases."

Science must be infinitely repeatable with consistent results.

True. But what passes for science today rarely ever uses the Scientific Method. Instead, they use "expert consensus" and "peer review" and "trust the science" and other such propaganda.

The systematic application of reason and real-world testing has been roundly applied to the theory of diseases and vaccines, and they are both so full of holes, there is nothing of value contained therein.

BINGO.

Obviously contagious diseases exist. But if they were spread by particles, masks would work.

Your second sentence is true, which should make you re-evaluate your first sentence.

PCR cycles were cranked up above 40 instead of at 25, causing over 90% false positives- and that those tests themselves were never actually based on an isolated virus, but rather components of influenza and cold.

PCR actually CREATES a lot of DNA sequences. Creates things that were never in the original sample.

This is why cranking up the cycles is sure to eventually create enough small DNA fragments that a computer program will piece enough of them together to "match" something bad.

Fewer cycles means fewer fragments created, which means no "match" to the bad stuff.

This is how they manipulated "Covid cases."

Ramp up the PCR cycles and you will get more "matches" and therefore more "cases."

Roll out the vaxx, and then reduce the PCR cycles, and you will get fewer "matches" and therefore fewer "cases," thereby ... "proving" that the vaxx saved the world !!!

I am not a DeSantis fan, but he has done some good things. One thing he did in 2020 was require testing labs to state how many PCR cycles they used to arrive at their result.

And what do ya know? Immediately thereafter, "Covid cases" in Florida dropped a bunch. Wow. Shocking.

I don't know who gave him the idea to do that, but someone might have known something.

Isolated viruses themselves have never been proven to cause disease

Even worse, no virus has ever been isolated. The word "isolated" is misused by the fraudsters by re-defining the term.

"Gay" used to mean happy, now it means faggot.

"Vaccine" used to mean injecting a "live virus" (no such thing, it turns out) to protect against future infection. Now, it means injecting something into someone to reduce symptoms ... or "cases."

"Isolate" used to mean (and really still does) to separate from all other things. But to virologists, it means mixing it with other things, using a bogus process, and claiming that the end result proves the virus is real. If they take a sample from one person, they call that isolation because it was from one person. This is really dumb, but that's what they do.

Remdesivir plus ventilators were the primary culprit in putting people who checked into the hospital with moderate symptoms into an early grave in a matter of hours.

Probably true. And almost everyone who "died of Covid" did so in a hospital. Nobody just dropped dead in a classroom or on a football field -- until the vaxx rollout.

And people had to be tested to know whether they were sick.

Thus, helping to create more "cases."

Science must be infinitely repeatable with consistent results.

True. But what passes for science today rarely ever uses the Scientific Method. Instead, they use "expert consensus" and "peer review" and "trust the science" and other such propaganda.

The systematic application of reason and real-world testing has been roundly applied to the theory of diseases and vaccines, and they are both so full of holes, there is nothing of value contained therein.

BINGO.

Obviously contagious diseases exist. But if they were spread by particles, masks would work.

Your second sentence is true, which should make you re-evaluate your first sentence.

PCR cycles were cranked up above 40 instead of at 25, causing over 90% false positives- and that those tests themselves were never actually based on an isolated virus, but rather components of influenza and cold.

PCR actually CREATES a lot of DNA sequences. Creates things that were never in the original sample.

This is why cranking up the cycles is sure to eventually create enough small DNA fragments that a computer program will piece enough of them together to "match" something bad.

Fewer cycles means fewer fragments created, which means no "match" to the bad stuff.

This is how they manipulated "Covid cases."

Ramp up the PCR cycles and you will get more "matches" and therefore more "cases."

Roll out the vaxx, and then reduce the PCR cycles, and you will get fewer "matches" and therefore fewer "cases," thereby ... "proving" that the vaxx saved the world !!!

Isolated viruses themselves have never been proven to cause disease

Even worse, no virus has ever been isolated. The word "isolated" is misused by the fraudsters by re-defining the term.

"Gay" used to mean happy, now it means faggot.

"Vaccine" used to mean injecting a "live virus" (no such thing, it turns out) to protect against future infection. Now, it means injecting something into someone to reduce symptoms ... or "cases."

"Isolate" used to mean (and really still does) to separate from all other things. But to virologists, it means mixing it with other things, using a bogus process, and claiming that the end result proves the virus is real. If they take a sample from one person, they call that isolation because it was from one person. This is really dumb, but that's what they do.

Remdesivir plus ventilators were the primary culprit in putting people who checked into the hospital with moderate symptoms into an early grave in a matter of hours.

Probably true. And almost everyone who "died of Covid" did so in a hospital. Nobody just dropped dead in a classroom or on a football field -- until the vaxx rollout.

And people had to be tested to know whether they were sick.

Thus, helping to create more "cases."

Science must be infinitely repeatable with consistent results.

True. But what passes for science today rarely ever uses the Scientific Method. Instead, they use "expert consensus" and "peer review" and "trust the science" and other such propaganda.

The systematic application of reason and real-world testing has been roundly applied to the theory of diseases and vaccines, and they are both so full of holes, there is nothing of value contained therein.

BINGO.