In case you are still reading this thread ...

But we share energy, and that energy triggers an immune response- IF YOU NEED IT.

That is a plausible theory.

The main problem we have today is: So many people have been indoctrinated into the false Germ Theory, that nobody is really testing other ideas to find out the root cause of illness(es).

If we had as much resources into other ideas as "germs," we would find some answers.

TB is VERY CONTAGIOUS, but only in households where they cook or heat with fire indoors.

That indicates to me that it is the indoor fire that causes the problem, and not some communicable disease.

If I do indoor fires, and my whole family gets sick, and then my kids play outdoors with your kids or even in your house, but your kids don't get sick, then it probably means something is going on inside my house that causes the sickness.

TB has been eradicated from the First World without vaccines, but it is still deadly throughout the Third World.

Probably because we don't DO what they do.

You can get hepatitis from things like drug abuse, from drinking too much, from taking too much Tylenol.

... which is simply Hepa (liver) and -titis (swelling/inflammation)- which is your body sending extra resources to your liver in order to process toxins more rapidly ...

Again, seems like an external toxic/poison that is causing it, and not a "virus."

I have read that Hep C is ususually something that happens to people with a lot of tattoos. The ink going into your bloodstream (or maybe just certain inks) cannot be healthy.

When you get an AIDS test, you are asked lifestyle questions. Why?

AIDS is not an illness. There is nothing specific about it. It is just a defninition.

The CDC has a list of 30+ illnesses (maybe more now, since I have not checked in years) that, if (a) you have one of them AND (b) you test positive for HIV, then you are diagnosed with AIDS.

If you have the illness but are HIV- (such as TB, which is on the list), then you "just" have TB. But if you have the illness and are HIV+, then the diagnosis is AIDS.

HIV is a retrovirus, and like ALL viruses has NEVER been isolated and purified, and there is no REAL evidence that it exists at all.

The "10-Year Study" was a study over 10 years of married couples, where one was HIV+ and the other was HIV-. During those 10 years, they had thousands of sexual acts with HIV+/HIV- and in 10 years, ZERO people who were HIV- because HIV+.

The test for HIV was the PCR test, which is NOT a real diagnostic tool. Since then, they have used Western Blot and other tests, all of which are fradulent as diagnostic tools.

Both HIV and AIDS are a scam for money. Neither exists. If you get a sickness that is listed on the CDC AIDS list, then yes, you are sick with that illness. But not AIDS.

The early AIDS patients in the 1980's were given AZT, an extremely toxic cancer drug that WILL kill you if you take it forever -- which is exactly what they were told to do.

Faggots in the West got weird sickness because they used nitrate poppers for loosening the anal muscles. They mixed these very toxic drugs with cocaine and other drugs to party all night, and they got sick from the drugs (not AIDS).

Africans, both male and female, got sick due to diseases of poverty and poor sanitation/hygene, and they got sick with different illnesses, but it became a gravy train for African countries to claim AIDS cases.

$$$$$

The biggest indicator that disease is generated internally is that nearly every single blood test for illness is a population count, and not a test for the absolute presence of the contagion

Right. They ALWAYS use some sort of surrogate method rather than simply finding that actual culprit.

I think illness is created by toxins and poisons, primarily the food/drink we consume, but also these other external influences, some of which are likely EMF's, radiation, etc.

"PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody... There's very few molecules that you don't have at least one single one of in your body". -Kary Mullis

Even Mullis himself might not have fully realized -- but it has been shown since -- that PCR itself CREATES additional DNA fragments, which when aligned with primers and then compared with an ever-growing database of so-called harmful pathogens, can be found to be a "match" for something bad in that database.

This is why they want the MRNA method of creating "vaccines." It is so they can claim that anyone has anything, and it can be treated with a custom MRNA injection.

Big money and big control.

In case you are still reading this thread ...

But we share energy, and that energy triggers an immune response- IF YOU NEED IT.

That is a plausible theory.

The main problem we have today is: So many people have been indoctrinated into the false Germ Theory, that nobody is really testing other ideas to find out the root cause of illness(es).

If we had as much resources into other ideas as "germs," we would find some answers.

TB is VERY CONTAGIOUS, but only in households where they cook or heat with fire indoors.

That indicates to me that it is the indoor fire that causes the problem, and not some communicable disease.

If I do indoor fires, and my whole family gets sick, and then my kids play outdoors with your kids or even in your house, but your kids don't get sick, then it probably means something is going on inside my house that causes the sickness.

TB has been eradicated from the First World without vaccines, but it is still deadly throughout the Third World.

Probably because we don't DO what they do.

You can get hepatitis from things like drug abuse, from drinking too much, from taking too much Tylenol.

... which is simply Hepa (liver) and -titis (swelling/inflammation)- which is your body sending extra resources to your liver in order to process toxins more rapidly ...

Again, seems like an external toxic/poison that is causing it, and not a "virus."

I have read that Hep C is ususually something that happens to people with a lot of tattoos. The ink going into your bloodstream (or maybe just certain inks) cannot be healthy.

When you get an AIDS test, you are asked lifestyle questions. Why?

AIDS is not an illness. There is nothing specific about it. It is just a defninition.

The CDC has a list of 30+ illnesses (maybe more now, since I have not checked in years) that, if (a) you have one of them AND (b) you test positive for HIV, then you are diagnosed with AIDS.

If you have the illness but are HIV- (such as TB, which is on the list), then you "just" have TB. But if you have the illness and are HIV+, then the diagnosis is AIDS.

HIV is a retrovirus, and like ALL viruses has NEVER been isolated and purified, and there is no REAL evidence that it exists at all.

The "10-Year Study" was a study over 10 years of married couples, where one was HIV+ and the other was HIV-. During those 10 years, they had thousands of sexual acts with HIV+/HIV- and in 10 years, ZERO people who were HIV- because HIV+.

The test for HIV was the PCR test, which is NOT a real diagnostic tool. Since then, they have used Western Blot and other tests, all of which are fradulent as diagnostic tools.

Both HIV and AIDS are a scam for money. Neither exists. If you get a sickness that is listed on the CDC AIDS list, then yes, you are sick with that illness. But not AIDS.

The early AIDS patients in the 1980's were given AZT, an extremely toxic cancer drug that WILL kill you if you take it forever -- which is exactly what they were told to do.

Faggots in the West got weird sickness because they used nitrate poppers for loosening the anal muscles. They mixed these very toxic drugs with cocaine and other drugs to party all night, and they got sick from the drugs (not AIDS).

Africans, both male and female, got sick due to diseases of poverty and poor sanitation/hygene, and they got sick with different illnesses, but it because a gravy train for African countries to claim AIDS cases. $$$$$

The biggest indicator that disease is generated internally is that nearly every single blood test for illness is a population count, and not a test for the absolute presence of the contagion

Right. They ALWAYS use some sort of surrogate method rather than simply finding that actual culprit.

I think illness is created by toxins and poisons, primarily the food/drink we consume, but also these other external influences, some of which are likely EMF's, radiation, etc.

"PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody... There's very few molecules that you don't have at least one single one of in your body". -Kary Mullis

Even Mullis himself might not have fully realized -- but it has been shown since -- that PCR itself CREATES additional DNA fragments, which when aligned with primers and then compared with an ever-growing database of so-called harmful pathogens, can be found to be a "match" for something bad in that database.

This is why they want the MRNA method of creating "vaccines." It is so they can claim that anyone has anything, and it can be treated with a custom MRNA injection.

Big money and big control.