Really wish Don Jr hadnt framed it that way but they must have a reason. All SCOTUS did was remove a temporary stay placed by the 5th Circuit when they agreed to hear the arguments en banc. (Edit: I havent read the assent or dissent yet. Feel free to call me a moron if by posting before I read them I got something, or even everything, wrong.)
I hate Politico but here you go:
A federal district judge had ordered the state in September to remove the controversial barrier, and a panel of the 5th Circuit Court upheld that in a 2-1 decision last month.
Days after the court ruled against Texas, the state asked for an en banc hearing, in which all the appellate court’s judges, not just the three-judge panel, reconsiders the case. En banc consideration is rare and less than 1 percent of the cases decided by the court are reheard.
The 5th Circuit on Wednesday granted Texas’ request, and the case will be reheard by the entire court in May. The decision by the 5th Circuit, considered the most conservative appeals court in the country, also vacates the previous opinion, meaning the river border buoys will stay in place while the litigation continues.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott first deployed the 1,000-foot barrier in early July and later claimed that it had deterred thousands of people from crossing. The Department of Justice sued the state, arguing that it obstructed U.S. waterways in violation of federal environmental law.
I am not going to link to Politico, its bad enough I gave them a click, and this is the entire article minus one small paragraph that is just Dems whining and blaming Texas for a migrant death.
The underlying issue here is Article 4, Section 4 of the Constitution which outlines the relationship between the various states, as well as the relationship between each state and the United States federal government.
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
I believe at the end of the day we will have some answers to questions that have been argued since the beginning of our Republic, Federalism vs State Sovereignty. This will all eventually tie into the Insurrection Act, Posse Comitatus and the use of the National Guard and other military forces to quell unrest and arrest the death cult puppets by shining the light on a rogue federal authority, delinquent in their sworn duty and running roughshod over the People and the Sovereign States.
Really wish Don Jr hadnt framed it that way but they must have a reason. All SCOTUS did was remove a temporary stay placed by the 5th Circuit when they agreed to hear the arguments en banc.
I hate Politico but here you go:
A federal district judge had ordered the state in September to remove the controversial barrier, and a panel of the 5th Circuit Court upheld that in a 2-1 decision last month.
Days after the court ruled against Texas, the state asked for an en banc hearing, in which all the appellate court’s judges, not just the three-judge panel, reconsiders the case. En banc consideration is rare and less than 1 percent of the cases decided by the court are reheard.
The 5th Circuit on Wednesday granted Texas’ request, and the case will be reheard by the entire court in May. The decision by the 5th Circuit, considered the most conservative appeals court in the country, also vacates the previous opinion, meaning the river border buoys will stay in place while the litigation continues.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott first deployed the 1,000-foot barrier in early July and later claimed that it had deterred thousands of people from crossing. The Department of Justice sued the state, arguing that it obstructed U.S. waterways in violation of federal environmental law.
I am not going to link to Politico, its bad enough I gave them a click, and this is the entire article minus one small paragraph that is just Dems whining and blaming Texas for a migrant death.
The underlying issue here is Article 4, Section 4 of the Constitution which outlines the relationship between the various states, as well as the relationship between each state and the United States federal government.
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
I believe at the end of the day we will have some answers to questions that have been argued since the beginning of our Republic, Federalism vs State Sovereignty. This will all eventually tie into the Insurrection Act, Posse Comitatus and the use of the National Guard and other military forces to quell unrest and arrest the death cult puppets by shining the light on a rogue federal authority, delinquent in their sworn duty and running roughshod over the People and the Sovereign States.