Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

So... you like to make assumptions? Where was she born? The article summary doesn't mention it and instead focuses on HER FATHER, which we can safely take to mean she was born here. The Constitution doesn't define the term "natural born Citizen". A court already ruled on parental citizenship NOT being required in Lynch v. Clarke (though this case wasn't specifically about Presidential eligibility).

Which means all this is just stirring up shit that is going to make us look bad and let the media drag out the Obama birth certificate thing again to attack Trump. Trump is going to crush Never Nikki and because of that, there is no need to go down this path.

115 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Where was she born? The article summary doesn't mention it and instead focuses on HER FATHER, which we can safely take to mean she was born here. The Constitution doesn't define the term "natural born Citizen". A court already ruled on parental citizenship NOT being required in Lynch v. Clarke (though this case wasn't specifically about Presidential eligibility).

Which means all this is just stirring up shit that is going to make us look bad and let the media drag out the Obama birth certificate thing again to attack Trump. Trump is going to crush Never Nikki and because of that, there is no need to go down this path.

115 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Where was she born? The article summary doesn't mention it and instead focuses on HER FATHER, which we can safely take to mean she was born here. The Constitution doesn't define the term "natural born Citizen". A court already ruled on parental citizenship NOT being required in Lynch v. Clarke.

Which means all this is just stirring up shit that is going to make us look bad and let the media drag out the Obama birth certificate thing again to attack Trump. Trump is going to crush Never Nikki and because of that, there is no need to go down this path.

115 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Where was she born? The article summary doesn't mention it and instead focuses on HER FATHER, which we can safely take to mean she was born here. The Constitution doesn't define the term "natural born Citizen". The Supreme Court already ruled on this in Perkins v. Elg.

Which means all this is just stirring up shit that is going to make us look bad and let the media drag out the Obama birth certificate thing again to attack Trump. Trump is going to crush Never Nikki and because of that, there is no need to go down this path.

115 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Where was she born? The article summary doesn't mention it and instead focuses on HER FATHER, which we can safely take to mean she was born here. The Constitution doesn't define the term "natural born Citizen", but in Lynch v. Clarke a Court already ruled on the subject (not in relation to being President) that parental citizenship doesn't matter.

Which means all this is just stirring up shit that is going to make us look bad and let the media drag out the Obama birth certificate thing again to attack Trump. Trump is going to crush Never Nikki and because of that, there is no need to go down this path.

115 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Where was she born? The article summary doesn't mention it and instead focuses on HER FATHER, which we can safely take to mean she was born here. Since the Constitution doesn't define the term "natural born citizen" its likely a court will interpret that to mean somebody born in the United States.

Which means all this is just stirring up shit that is going to make us look bad and let the media drag out the Obama birth certificate thing again to attack Trump. Trump is going to crush Never Nikki and because of that, there is no need to go down this path.

115 days ago
1 score